Who fell harder?

tanners jump was a switch nine on chads how evere simion went big if were talkin about respectability i like tanners cause it was something no one sides jon was doin but crashes equal = hardness but tanner got a worse injury hi hell may never hell fully
 
For the last time, a person's injury does NOT signify the severity of the crash. You can slip down stairs and crack your head open and on the flip side roll a car into a tree but walk away. Anyone would agree the car would be the worse accident because of what happened, not of the injuries sustained.
 
simon definatley had the bigger crash, he's lucky he's still alive, he fell from some crazy altitude, although i wouldn't want to be in tanners shoes either, both crashes would hurt like hell !
 
u cant say dumont could of just got lucky withno injurys and tanner got unlucky with a bad one.....so its hard to say dumont fell 100 feet to hard ice and tanner cased a big gap....but people have cased chads just as bad or even worsethen tanner who have u seen over shoot a HUGE TABLE and go like 100FEET TO HARD ICE?
 
I wouldnt go ahead and say Tanner sustained worse injuries. I would say that the kind just takes longer to recover from. Cause Dumont's pelvis was crushed and his spleen ruptured. THat to me seems more serious than an ankle. But IDK im not a doctor...

Dumont's was worse
 
exactly, this is not even an argument dumonts crash is ten times worse if snowmobile was going 2 or 3 mph faster this would be an r i p dumont thread, you cant tell how sick the shit is on tape
 
that was at like 7 - 8 in the morning and simon got knocked out also, i guess he made a dent in the ice from his head
 
simon, if you look at the full images/vids, simon's body rag-dolls across the flat where he landed, tanner just kinda cartwheeled in pow, which i do think has to suck when you have two broken ankles, but simon was like rolling on cement, aka park groom.
 
I'm going to say Dumont, he went bigger, and he fell the equivalent of like a 40 foot building to flat ice basically.
 
Both brutal. But no one takes sking more serious than tanner. Hes working his ass off to get better. But he had brutal injuries and still wont be competing this year. Being out due to injuries is the hardest thing to deal with.
 
I think Dumont's definitely had more energy transferred to his body when he hit. With Tanner's he still had the energy to cartwheel like crazy.

Anyone who regularly sees automobile racing knows that a crash when the car tumbles is better than going straight into the wall and not doing anything after that.
 
dumont_big.jpg
 
Definatly the Dumonts. He fell from a good 100 feet. Plus anytime you get internal injuries i.e. ruptured spleen or whatever happend to him its so much more bad ass than a broken bone, which he got also.
 
simon was bein towed in at the right speed but he didnt think so, so he pulled the rope in right before he let go to get more speed, it might not seem like it would make a difference but as we can see, it did
 
^^ if t-hall and dumont went base jumpin and tanner had a parachute and dumont didn't, you'd say t-hall landed harder. sry man but when it comes to t-hall your biased, u might aswell get it over with and suck his dik
 
tanners,

he came to a complete stop from 53mph whereas dumont hit and slid.

look at it this way, would you rather jump out of a car at 50mph or hit a brick wall at 50mph?
 
shit man i have a feeling that im screwed over-shooting a 30 foot tablew. i can imagive having 4 seconds to think (and he could have) that im gonna die

dumonts all the way
 
well, using simple physics, i've determined that mr dumont would have had to fall around 95 feet (or there abouts) to hit the ground at the same speed mr hall did (53mph). so basically, if the height of that fall was more than 100ft, he definately hit the ground at a higher speed

and ,

what makes his crash so much worse was the force at which he hit the ground. in mr halls case, he was travelling forward and had his feet knocked out from under him, so only his feet took the full impact of the blow, whereas mr dumont's entire body smashed into the ground at whatever speed.
 
OH, and i only worked the y axis there, not the diagonal, so i mean, that totally adds to the impact right thurrrr.
 
what are you saying up retard...brick wall?...maybe if you made it say you jump out of a car at 50mph and clip you feet and ragdolled...he didnt come to a complete stop at all....jeez
 
Simon for sure... tanner's was bad but not that bad looking on film you see wrecks close to that all the time in movies... (the outcome isn't usually this bad.) but simon's was fucking scary i still don;t think that I have watched it all I look away everytime..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top