Who doesn't own crowbars?

Agreed, everytime he replies in a thread, its something totally irrelevant that is starting to piss me off. He makes great edits and is a great skier, but please stop with the irrelevant shit.
 
dope, crowbars are obviously a very popular goggle not just because they look good, they are comfortable and never fog, i just don't understand why no-one uses SCOTT, the goggles henrik rides with are sick, seriously underrated, maybe 4 people in this thread said they use SCOTT
 
I rock these cause they are sick
oakley-crowbar.jpg

I don't care if everyone has them
 
i am in the process of getting rid of mine and getting von zipper feenoms and smith phenoms or some eg2's
 
i am only getting crowbars because they look sick and they have HDO. and if so many people have them, there must be something good about them.
 
I'm suprised theres not at many "fuck crowbars everyones got them" replies in here.

its sooooo cool to go against the trend, even if the trend is a good product. going against the trend IS a trend....
 
soldiers and c-bars. use is about 50/50 i think the cbars are better about not fogging and getting snow in them, but thats just me
 
electric eg1, eg1 sphericals, and smith phenoms

im actually debating to get crowbars though, I have nothing against them besides the fact that everyone has them
 
guys and girls, as i said before, i have nothing against them, im just saying so many people have them, i partially amazed, and at the same time, i feel people should be different too, for example, look how many pages of the crowbar trading thread there is, its amazing
 
sry, but i have crowbars, but do u guys think electric eg2's look good on skiers with the huge lenses
 
anons are comfy, plus they were $35

i don't believe in paying $100 for goggles... just seems like you can get a pretty good deal on almost equally good stuff...

oakley is just about brand recognition.

they do have good stuff, just not $100 good.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top