Which Company is better Line or Armada?

I haven't rode on armada's yet, so im gonna go with line. I love my lines, i have had them the longest and i still rather ski them than my scratchs'
 
^ thats what sucks for line, maybe 1 in 100 skis delam to half of what they say but the only people that bother poasting about line skis are the ones that are pissed they got a bad ski. most people only use a ski for one ski seasone any way
 
line seems to be going down the shit hole from this season but we will see what they have to offer i think im gonna stick with em
 
i have lines but they feel like more of a starter ski and im planning on "graduating" to some armadas for next seaseon.....soo ill say armada
 
^no

ARMADA they are the only skis i feel comfortable riding now and i beat the shit outta them every day and they have lasted so far

knock on woodyo
 
I really like the aarmada line this year, and they make really durable skis that are sick, but they are so goddamn expensive. from line you can get a good ski for $400-450 (cronic-cwide-mothership) the only ski you could get from armada with $400 is the ar3. And line also trys out new ideas, They each have their pros and cons but since I have alot of money I would be more likely to buy armadas.
 
that's because you're on mavericks, its not comparable to chronics, elizabeth etc.

and I have to say Line, I like the skis more, and I get really tired of how hyped and concious of their appearance Armada seems.
 
I like Line better. They're a lighter more fun ski. They're innvoations for the ski industry have also been pretty cool. Im from the east coast so also home field pride there.
 
both are sick and i would rifde both but i like line better, plus armanda has the worst sponsored skier in the world in boronowski so i would have to say line is better
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top