What's wrong with American democracy and how can it be fixed?

straightlining

straightlining

Member
I'm writing a university essay on this topic and It'd be nice to hear your opinions of the topic. Additionally, seeing as you're all actually American, you're going to have more insight on this topic than I do.

So go ahead, vent, rage, bitch whatever, it's all good and it helps.

 
Not abiding rules, stomping on the constitution and basically doing whatever they want. Downvote/ Upvote, Still doesn't change the fact that the NSA is spying on U.S citizens, as well as this post. I love America, but DESPISE what the government has turned into. For this to change, there will be bloodshed. Anonymous is a good start.

 
The way its set up makes it so if you aren't voting for the two major parties people consider it a wasted vote. It's impossible for another party to gain traction.

And fuck you NSA agent reading this

Really recently some program was uncovered that's been going on for the past 7 years ... I'll look it up I guess
 
Yeah some program named "PRISM" look it up.

If someone said they were doing this years ago they would be scrutinized and someone would throw up a tin foil hat meme, well wake up and smell the flowers.
 
People who think the constitution is the end all be all of everything and a faultless, flawless document that people should get on their knees daily to worship and sacrifice 100 virgins to.

Or, in other words, a lack of common sense from citizens. Also politicians who are more concerned about keeping their jobs than doing them correctly.
 
Politics has become a rich mans reality show. Its no longer about voting for who or what will help our country, its about who belongs to what party, who did a favor to who (congress.)Fun Fact: A group of monkeys can be referred to as a congress.

642384.jpeg

642383.jpeg

 
well it's not a pure democracy. it's a representative democracy and our representatives are more concerned with money from lobbyists and keeping their jobs that they rarely do them in the interest of the people. they're also out of touch with the general public.
 
Lobbyists and election donors. The amount of money in politics is disgusting, and even worse when its coming from super pac's and other absurd organizations that allow massive anonymous corporate donations.

 
democracy being the best form of government is like a foot tumor being the best kind of tumor: they're all terrible
 
My opinion: 99% of the information you put on the internet is public anyway. And of course the government tracks and records calls, but unless you're plotting some crazy crime, they wont give 2 shits what you're saying. Probably wont even look or listen, considering they have 300 million other people to watch. Even small crimes like talking about doing drugs, nobody's going to show up at your door. If you really want to hide something from the government for whatever reason, it's easy enough to.

Shit on me.
 
One possible way to improve democracy in the US would be to get rid of the electoral college system and have direct elections for president. Akhil Amar (might be a good person to google lectures of to get some ideas) talks about three requirement for amendments to the constitution that generally lead to that amendment's success:

1. That states are already doing it (states have direct elections for governors).

2. That both parties would be willing to agree to it (maybe if the amendment was set to be go in effect 50 or 100 years in the future, both parties might be fine with it).

3. It continues the trend of democracy in the US (the expansion of suffrage to all non-felon adults, the election of the Senate by the people, etcetera).

The direct election of the president would further the ideal of "one person one vote" (As not all votes count equally under the electoral college). Some variation of runoff elections would also probably be necessary under this system.
 
The tree of liberty was not pruned regularly.

In fact it has not been pruned once.

Its looking all overgrown and bushy.
 
The gov't was set up as an aristocracy from the start. It's been fucked from the start. Ever since '76 we've been romping around the glove shoving something down other countries' throats that we ourselves don't advocate.
 
A bi-lateral party system is, imo, largely unhealthy for a democracy, especially in America where domestic politics is only divided on a handful of issues such as the welfare state, abortion and immigration. There is no real plurality in American politics, both main parties are right of centre, pro-capitalist, Christian and federalists just to differing degrees. A broad political spectrum represented through elected representatives is good, it breathes fresh air into old issues by tackling problems from multiple positions.

The separation of powers in America is astonishingly counter-productive too. Whilst a system of checks and balances is a sign of a healthy democracy, the case in America has allowed for essentially a veto from one branch of government to another. It makes the legislative process unbearably slow thus legislation is not moving step by step with American society.

Also, the ability of the President to make executive orders amazes me, it's unbelievably undemocratic.

Proportional representation and a breaking down of the separation of powers.
 
i think being a politician used to be more of a civil duty, but is more profit oriented now. And by "used to", i mean wayyy back in the day. I try to stay out of politics though so i probably dont know what i am talking about.
 
The two party system, your minimal separation between church and state, lobbyists, outdated constitution, and lack of political transparency.

Add to that that you have politicians who don't care about the American people, they just want longer terms, and serve their own agendas.

Also rediculous economical theories introduced by the republicans under Ronald Reagan are making sure that you don't come out of a recession a world power.
 
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Nea09xO4Ndw?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
Something I've always thought is a problem, the two party system. We just have two parties who operate in absolutes and for the most part refuse to give in to the other. It can't just be black and white there has to be compromises and they usually refuse to let that happen. Even going far enough to completely prevent the other from doing anything.
 
What's wrong with America is our idea of being strictly consumerism. We are now not the ones who produce anything, really. We are the ones who only consume.

The flaw in this, is that in order to make money, you have to produce then sell. We do not do that. We use to, but now almost all of our things are produced in china and other places.

We have a TEMPORARY solution, by borrowing money, but once we can no longer borrow, what are we to do?

I think the only way to do it is to make the labor prices lower, so we can compete with China. Although this does not sound like a good idea, it is the only way to fix this problem. If being powerful is not a concern to the United States anymore, we can keep on doing what we are doing.
 
1. Party system

2. Citizens United

3. Education (or lack thereof)

4. Media manufacturing consent

5. Electoral college

Any questions?
 
Too many issues to address, but a particular conundrum is that large right wing companies that destroy small business (Wal-Mart, Koch Industries subsidiaries and so on) are the ones who back politicians who are supposedly fighting for small business. How effective can a politician be in helping small business if the only reason they hold office is because a corporation put them there?

seems odd to me.
 
Too many issues to address, but a particular conundrum is that large right wing companies that destroy small business (Wal-Mart, Koch Industries subsidiaries and so on) are the ones who back politicians who are supposedly fighting for small business. How effective can a politician be in helping small business if the only reason they hold office is because a corporation put them there?

seems odd to me.
 
Close, but incorrect.

Plato believed in 4 different political system of government. You have the aristocracy (which he believed was the best system because the foremost experts of each branch should be the most entitled to do the job and do it by passion), Olicracy (a breakdown of government and its constituents; according to Plato. It is when the parliament (or establishment) is only occupied by nominations and by the bourgeois and can not be attended by the citizen.), democracy (a good temporary government because electing peers to run government can function until the bourgeois take it to promote their business and wealth. This system however degrades to the olicracy, then to tyranny) and Tyranny ( where a small group of people control the majority, often with brutality to discourage opposition).

I can say, be are in the Olicracy era. Elite people that are not elected (they are promoted) high in the government agency are those running the system. Political leaders are all about taking the heat. Face it, most elected members are the most useless people on the planet; they cant even hammer a nail with a hammer. But, if you have tried to get into politics, you will be its a fierce competition. The guys in there, never want to leave; no matter how bad they are doing their job.

Business has infiltrated government. People who have a crapton of money will lobby and sway legislation for their company (or industry) or directly get involved in politics in order to get a return on investments. Government today is not just dictating market, people in the market are controlling government to control the market in their favor. How we have a shit show of politician lobbyists seeking control without accounting for the people they should represent.

The next step in tyranny, unless someone cleans out government. The people in power will centralise power for themselves and begin forcing the citizen to stand in line while the government are out breaking the same rules they apply to their people.
 
we have people making laws on stuff that they really dont know anything about and they are too concerned about keeping their jobs and making lobbyists happy. I am sure this has already been said.

Fuck superpacs.
 
Freedom!

Failure is civilizations destiny. The more we try to prevent it, the closer it comes.

If we look to nature for inspiration. There is balance. For something to eat, something must die. For a species to thrive, another must fail. It's nature, It's organic.

We need to create an organic society. One that has morals, and punishment, and an unlimited potential for growth.

For anyone every success, there is a failure. No freebies in the real world.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top