^you couldnt be more wrong. first, you only get 2 claymores, so killing 6 is hard with only 2. second, barely anyone uses claymores. its only people sniping and have them behind them so no one sneaks up. you can deff kill 6 people 6v1 on halo. they give out awards for it and its really not hard. call of duty 6v1 i think is harder. if cod is boring to you, then you need to learn how to play. theres much more action in most cod levels then in halo. and teamwork? please.
they're 2 totally different games, with different engines, gameplay, and just the way the controller acts to certain movements. to argue that either is better is kinda dumb because of those factors. that and one is aimed at being realistic, the other clearly nothing like realistic. more people do play cod than halo tho.
personally i like cod because i like realistic games. and i was never really good at halo. it wasnt that im not tactical, or i cant shoot, or anything like that, i just like realistic games and the way they are setup. imo
and to end the post, you all are retarted by saying that cod5 is gonna suck because its made by a shit company. cod3 was better than 2, 4 better than 3, and now 5 will most likely improve too. and the game is using the same exact game engine because treyarch and infinity merged, therefore the company making 5 is the same as 4, as will be the same as 6. they just started making 5 before the merge, and converted the graphics engine to the one in 4.
actually to end it, cod5, flamethrowers. that is all.