What skis do you want to see on Roofbox Reviews?
- Thread starter Twig
- Start date
WoFIowz
Active member
K2 reckoner?
Also check out the gear recommendations by people and do some on the skis most commonly mentioned but that are difficult to find for demoing. That's always a tough decision for folks buying a ski without skiing it. I know roof box reviews have helped me in the past
Also check out the gear recommendations by people and do some on the skis most commonly mentioned but that are difficult to find for demoing. That's always a tough decision for folks buying a ski without skiing it. I know roof box reviews have helped me in the past
Helltown_Sender
Member
Magnus 102’s vs magnus 90
LukeTheWaffle
Active member
New faction CT 1 and 2, faction LA MACHINE, armada white walker, revolt / bash 86, and maybe making some comparison series, like where 3 common skis are and see how they compare, eg CT 2.0, Poacher, Blend, or something like that
clindblomskier
Member
Pleeeaaseee review the reckoner 102
jibbernando
New member
Movement fly two 105
patagonialuke
Active member
I'd be curious to hear your take on the Bent Chetler 100
Spent my "park half" of the day on bent chetler 100, gotto say they are good in the air/landings, and even on boxes, still so new I cringe about the rails as they have edges still 
Fairly stiff for a so light ski so they dont noodle out on my variable landings. Skied with another guy on same skis, he was sending it pretty hard.
Fairly stiff for a so light ski so they dont noodle out on my variable landings. Skied with another guy on same skis, he was sending it pretty hard.
BackWoods420
Member
Wildcat 108 & Deathwish
saucy+steve
Member
14110808:TheClap. said:
Yes. Do one on the Give'r or the Royale
Obama_care
Member
14110720:s.buchs143 said:
Defenitly Franken ski. Can't find a single review on them.
Obama_care
Member
Ninthward skis would be so sick. wanna see what there skis are about.
saucy+steve
Member
14111502:TheClap. said:
I just got a pair so I might do a review of them after about a month of riding.
crustyboot.420
Member
Movement fly two 95 or 105 and Black Crows Captis or Camox
14110735:anders_a said:
Ok, so these are all in progress already. To keep you guys in the loop, our current in-progress/definitely coming list is:
Faction:
CT 1.0
CT 2.0
Prodigy 3.0
Prodigy 4.0
Armada:
ARV 106
Stranger
Whitewalker (TBD, shortage of samples but def on the radar).
K2:
Reckoner 102
Reckoner 112
Line:
Wallisch Pro
Blend
Vision 118
Liberty:
Helix 88
14110773:Viehweg said:
All three of these skis are ones I'd love to get on the Roofbox. I've been asking ON3P consistently for several seasons about getting someone on a Magnus 102 and not heard back. I would also love to get a review of Lucas' new ski if it's finally dropping. Watch this space. I asked Vishnu about both the Plus Skis at the beginning of this season and they said no. I hope both brands do decide to get involved again.
[tag=229241]@patagonialuke[/tag] I definitely want to try and get on a Bentchetler 100 for a longer term test, I'm waiting to hear back on those. I'd also definitely like to get the Surface Royale/Giv'r on the feet of one of our testers, hopefully I can arrange that having seen the interest here. Movement would also be an interesting option, I'll talk to them. Thanks guys, keep these coming!
Jaggy_Snake
Active member
More Fauna!
LukeTheWaffle
Active member
14110794:jibbernando said:
I AGREEEEE
BackEastStowe11
New member
Volkl Revolt 104!
tomPietrowski
Active member
Line blade!
NvR_Forgetti
Member
Crow's?
crustyboot.420
Member
Down skis would be nice too. They make
some cool skis.
some cool skis.
olic
Member
Not a specific ski but a really useful tool would be a ski comparison chart of some kind, no idea how you'd make it work but I think it could be super useful for making choices.
Like I'm currently torn between the K2 Poacher or the Line Chronic, love aspects of both but a side by side with your opinions having ridden both would be helpful I think...
Like I'm currently torn between the K2 Poacher or the Line Chronic, love aspects of both but a side by side with your opinions having ridden both would be helpful I think...
olic
Member
14113628:animator said:
I guess I mean more of a kind of comparable points or rating system for those more esoteric traits that are less measurable, kinda like on a video game e.g: Stiffness, Playfulness, Edge Hold, Top Speed, Durability, Overall Flex, Pop, Stability etc
I know the numbers would be pretty arbitrary as they're not really measurable characteristics but like how much playfulness and pop am I losing moving from a Chronic to trhe Poacher, or how much extra stability, that kinda thing...
Might help people compare different skis from a similar ballpark more easily? Just a thought
patagonialuke
Active member
14115031:severniy said:
I haven't flexed the CT 2.0, but the Prodigy 3.0 felt notably softer in the tips and tails than the previous version. The previous Prodigy 3.0 was a very stiff ski, while I'd call the 20/21 version a bit closer to "average" in terms of flex for an all-mountain freestyle ski. It's no noodle (still quite stiff around the bindings), but it doesn't stand out as much in terms of flex vs. the previous version.
SoggyOatmeal420
Member
Moment frankenski and meridian
**This post was edited on Mar 6th 2020 at 9:06:11pm
**This post was edited on Mar 6th 2020 at 9:06:11pm