Freezeskier Member Feb 20, 2008 #1 compare to burton, analog pants?? beside being baggy..are the longer in length??
mccsteezy Active member Feb 20, 2008 #2 yeah i dont know, sac said they were preaty standerd but my 2l jacket is a small but fits like a large. so yeah idk??
yeah i dont know, sac said they were preaty standerd but my 2l jacket is a small but fits like a large. so yeah idk??
St.Steezy Active member Feb 20, 2008 #3 just get xl. Doesn't really matter how big you are. But yes they do run bigger all around, including length.
just get xl. Doesn't really matter how big you are. But yes they do run bigger all around, including length.
funk. Active member Feb 20, 2008 #5 i'm 6'1" and larges fit fine until i put the suspenders on. they sups. don't get very long at all.
funk. Active member Feb 20, 2008 #7 when i don't wear the supsenders they are. but then when i put them on they are too short and not very baggy.
when i don't wear the supsenders they are. but then when i put them on they are too short and not very baggy.
Freezeskier Member Feb 20, 2008 #8 word thanks...just bought them...yes... fresh gear and no more holes in pants
F freshlyDIPPED Active member Feb 20, 2008 #10 i heard that site is bullshit and people never get there stuff
Silence Active member Staff member Feb 26, 2008 #12 Such a textbook newschoolers comment right there.