JuanBautista
New member
Hi guys, i wanna buy armada skis arv 96. for all mountain and park! Mi size is 161 cm, male, and 130 lbs. Which size you think i should buy? 163 or 170? i think 170 is going to be a little bit big but i dont know
13959192:Swiftyski572 said:I'd go for the 170, you'll grow into them and no shame getting better on a longer ski
13959196:JuanBautista said:I should clarify that I am 21 years old and I will not grow more haha. or you mean it in my ski skills??
13959200:SofaKingSick said:sorry, i clicked to reply but took a while to actually reply so i missed this
yeah if you're done growing def go 163. right around your height is perfect
9 cm over your head isn't necessary or beneficial for park skis unless you just love big ass skis. i only get skis way bigger than me if theyre for big mtn charging (and even then, only size up that much if you have extremely good control over your skis)
13959213:JuanBautista said:It really make sense what you said. I’ll go for 163 then, I have a really good control over my skis but I’ll be in east cost this.. not big mountains haha. Thanks for your time bro!
13959245:SofaKingSick said:yeah for east coast def not even a question, 163. youre welcome, have fun!
13959318:JuanBautista said:Thanks man! One more question. About bindings, I should mount them in the centre right??
13959320:SofaKingSick said:and armada's mount point is pretty "progressive" anyway, that is, they don't have a recommended mount point that is way back. it's probably a couple inches back from dead center
13959321:SofaKingSick said:it's probably a couple inches back from dead center MAX i should say. if i had to guess it's like an inch and a half back or something. not way back like some more "traditional" skis are
13959325:mystery3 said:The 16/17 has two lines: progressive at -2.5 and all-mountain at -4.5 fwiw
13959327:SofaKingSick said:okay yeah, so 2.5in is like an inch back, and 4.5in is like 1.7 inches back. i'd suggest ""progressive"" (said in slow mo douche voice)
thank you Mystery!