What Freeride Charger to buy? (Woodsman vs Countach vs Sender Free)

D

Dingletron

New member
What’s up

looking for some advice on my next pair of skis. 5’9” 160 lbs, pretty strong skier skiing primarily in the Front Range and San Juan’s. I want skis that can ski steep variable shit fast with confidence, while still being able to spin, potentially take into the park for a lap, and use in tight trees. (East Wall / Steep Gullies at A bay, Palymra peak at Telluride).

i currently ski ON3P Jeffrey 108s in 181 and love the dampness, stability, and burly feeling of ON3Ps and like how easy they are to spin and butter, but have found on super steep, big, crunchy lines they get pretty chattery and don’t let you drive the shovels very hard. Also terrible on ice.

ive been eyeing the Woodsman’s, seem like they should have been the ski I bought originally.

also been seeing a bunch of the Moment team using the Countachs for similar skiing, so very intrigued.

had the deathwish 112s, far far too soft for my style of skiing

others I’m considering:

Rossi Sender Free 110

Dynastar M Free

Moment Wildcat 116

ON3P Wrenegade 108

Woodsman 108

Faction Dancer

Black Crow Anima

im looking at widths between 100-108, but also have a pow ski shaped hole in my quiver , so willing to snag the Wildcats or Animas if it makes sense.

can any of you beasts chime in if you’ve used any of these skis or have suggestions on others? Thanks!

**This thread was edited on Feb 20th 2024 at 11:26:25pm
 
topic:Dingletron said:
What’s up

looking for some advice on my next pair of skis. 5’9” 160 lbs, pretty strong skier skiing primarily in the Front Range and San Juan’s. I want skis that can ski steep variable shit fast with confidence, while still being able to spin, potentially take into the park for a lap, and use in tight trees. (East Wall / Steep Gullies at A bay, Palymra peak at Telluride).

i currently ski ON3P Jeffrey 108s in 181 and love the dampness, stability, and burly feeling of ON3Ps and like how easy they are to spin and butter, but have found on super steep, big, crunchy lines they get pretty chattery and don’t let you drive the shovels very hard. Also terrible on ice.

ive been eyeing the Woodsman’s, seem like they should have been the ski I bought originally.

also been seeing a bunch of the Moment team using the Countachs for similar skiing, so very intrigued.

had the deathwish 112s, far far too soft for my style of skiing

others I’m considering:

Rossi Sender Free 110

Dynastar M Free

Moment Wildcat 116

ON3P Wrenegade 108

Woodsman 108

Faction Dancer

Black Crow Anima

im looking at widths between 100-108, but also have a pow ski shaped hole in my quiver , so willing to snag the Wildcats or Animas if it makes sense.

can any of you beasts chime in if you’ve used any of these skis or have suggestions on others? Thanks!

**This thread was edited on Feb 20th 2024 at 11:26:25pm
Click to expand...

Wildcat shares an ash/poplar core like the DW. Stiffness is going to be similar so if the dw was too soft you’ll likely find the wildcat too soft.

the Countach is beech/poplar. It’s a decent amount stiffer. I’d point you towards the countach between those three staying in that general width.
 
Of the skis ive skied:

1. Rossi Sender Free 110

2. Faction Dancer

3. Dynastar M Free

"drive the shovels" and jeffreys do not mix. Of the above, sender free will feel more playful than the dancer but less capable of fully opening up. M free will feel like the lighter and looser vs of sender free.

And you can hit park on any ski, but like I'd just get a park ski too, no point in putting edge cracks in your metal charger ski that you didn't want to detune.
 
14592351:mikem said:
Of the skis ive skied:

1. Rossi Sender Free 110

2. Faction Dancer

3. Dynastar M Free

"drive the shovels" and jeffreys do not mix. Of the above, sender free will feel more playful than the dancer but less capable of fully opening up. M free will feel like the lighter and looser vs of sender free.

And you can hit park on any ski, but like I'd just get a park ski too, no point in putting edge cracks in your metal charger ski that you didn't want to detune.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the input. Agreed, I’ve been forcing the Jeff’s into a ski style they’re not meant for. The Rossis look really fun, worried about durability compared to ON3Ps
 
14592367:Dingletron said:
Thanks for the input. Agreed, I’ve been forcing the Jeff’s into a ski style they’re not meant for. The Rossis look really fun, worried about durability compared to ON3Ps
Click to expand...

its a new ski this year so cant speak to durability, seems pretty solid. but durability on a ski, we on ns have accepted its stupid.

All park skis require a side purchase of west systems gflex 650 epoxy. And freeride skis require just like 10 mins of research, and then landing not on rocks too hard and too dumb.

based on feel/ski, i actually think the rossi will hold up. top sheet chipping seems to be a thing but who cares. I've seen questionable QC on dancers/dictators but overall they will hold an edge better and bust crud/moguls meaner. but at a price of freestyle.
 
Head kore 105, 115 if you want damper/stiffer. Light and nimble through dense trees but really come alive once you hit 40mph and can take even the burliest of freeride lines. Compared to my wrenegades they’re much less floppy and noodly in bad conditions. My favorite thing to do on em is point the shovels downhill on a steep face and see how fast I can get going over the moguls, haven’t found a speed limit yet. I’ve mounted mine -2 behind rec and they’re great ridden forwards but bite a bit switch until you’re used to em
 
Seems like you are asking a lot of one ski. Going more chargy freeride ski you will end up with something that isn't going to spin as well, a bit more work in the park, and a bit more cumbersome in tight trees.

I had a similar experience with my Jeff 100 in 181 on steep chopped up terrain and on ice. Yet, the 100 width wasn't necessarily going to excel in those conditions. I grabbed a pair of the DW 104, which from what Moment and others have said are probably in between the Countach and Wildcat in terms of stiffness (Countach > WC (full) > DW 104 > WC 108 or something like that).

If you are fine with. the loss in versatility, I'd think the Countach would be an awesome choice. The Woodsman could be great as well, but I think the Countach is going to be stiffer and a bit more chargy. Another brand Made in America brand I'll throw out is Praxis. I have their Praxis MVP 108 in 184 (measures 181). It probably slots in between the Countach and the WC and Woodsman in terms of stiffness. I was just down in Kirkwood two weeks ago when they were getting freshies and was all smiles. Dropping off the ridgeline I felt I could really attack the steeps when the snow was fresh, but also when it was getting tracked out and more variable. Yet, I am also easily able to do spins, pop off stuff at slower speeds, ski switch, etc.

If you are worried about quality control and durability, then opt for a Made in America brand (and also just to support those companies). I literally landed on a boulder and felt it stab into my MVP 108. Looked down and all I had was a few scratches. Hear similar of ON3P and Moment.
 
14592406:colerichardmyers said:
Seems like you are asking a lot of one ski. Going more chargy freeride ski you will end up with something that isn't going to spin as well, a bit more work in the park, and a bit more cumbersome in tight trees.

I had a similar experience with my Jeff 100 in 181 on steep chopped up terrain and on ice. Yet, the 100 width wasn't necessarily going to excel in those conditions. I grabbed a pair of the DW 104, which from what Moment and others have said are probably in between the Countach and Wildcat in terms of stiffness (Countach > WC (full) > DW 104 > WC 108 or something like that).

If you are fine with. the loss in versatility, I'd think the Countach would be an awesome choice. The Woodsman could be great as well, but I think the Countach is going to be stiffer and a bit more chargy. Another brand Made in America brand I'll throw out is Praxis. I have their Praxis MVP 108 in 184 (measures 181). It probably slots in between the Countach and the WC and Woodsman in terms of stiffness. I was just down in Kirkwood two weeks ago when they were getting freshies and was all smiles. Dropping off the ridgeline I felt I could really attack the steeps when the snow was fresh, but also when it was getting tracked out and more variable. Yet, I am also easily able to do spins, pop off stuff at slower speeds, ski switch, etc.

If you are worried about quality control and durability, then opt for a Made in America brand (and also just to support those companies). I literally landed on a boulder and felt it stab into my MVP 108. Looked down and all I had was a few scratches. Hear similar of ON3P and Moment.
Click to expand...

Countach and deathwish 104 share the same stiffer core. They’re both going to be stiffer than all the WC and the DW 112.

poplar/beech in the Countach dw 104.

Ash/poplar in the wc line up and dw 112.

countach>dw 104>wc lineup and dw 112
 
Currently on the Woodsman 110 from last year. I love them. They can charge through everything big mountain, and I even rip them in the park sometimes. I've got a few vids on here and youtube with em. But in terms of chatter, I've never had an issue straight-lining and slicing through chunder. I'd highly reccommend

**This post was edited on Feb 21st 2024 at 11:07:58am
 
14592377:brownetown said:
Head kore 105, 115 if you want damper/stiffer. Light and nimble through dense trees but really come alive once you hit 40mph and can take even the burliest of freeride lines. Compared to my wrenegades they’re much less floppy and noodly in bad conditions. My favorite thing to do on em is point the shovels downhill on a steep face and see how fast I can get going over the moguls, haven’t found a speed limit yet. I’ve mounted mine -2 behind rec and they’re great ridden forwards but bite a bit switch until you’re used to em
Click to expand...

Head kore is a dogshit ski
 
Really appreciate all the input everyone. Gonna try and get on my friends Woodsman’s, and also try and demo some Countachs, MVPs and Sender Frees when I’m out in Squaw, those all seem pretty ideal, albeit pretty different shapes.
 
i been really liking my m frees recently and I don't understand the dampness from the jeffs. id think they'd have quite a bit of playfulness in them. will say the dynastars arent the poppiest ski, but in the air they feel nice although I might be looking at some more playful options in the future as I get older.
 
14592647:SmokedGouda said:
i been really liking my m frees recently and I don't understand the dampness from the jeffs. id think they'd have quite a bit of playfulness in them. will say the dynastars arent the poppiest ski, but in the air they feel nice although I might be looking at some more playful options in the future as I get older.
Click to expand...

Are you speaking from experience of having been on the jeffs? I have been riding my Jeff 100s for a week or so and, albeit they are the Jeff 100 in 181, feel they aren't really that damp. They are definitely a bit more stable and damp than other freestyle skis due to them being ON3P. Yet, they are still freestyle skis at the end of the day and just aren't going to be all that stable and damp.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top