It used to be Moto X.  Now it has been toned down to death because it is 100% ex-racers doing it, and they have taken 99% of the freestyle influence out of it.
It's a completely different mindset from boardercross.  (The majority of boardercrossers are from freestyle backgrounds, used to compete in pipe etc., and hey want their courses to be nothing close to a race course.)
In skiercross, they've moved the gates down the berm until it's a point where nobody has to ride the berms anymore, they just do a gs turn on the fllats.  They knock the lips down so that they can be "pressed" over like when you come over a roller in a super-g.  Rarely, if ever, do you see a skiercross course anymore where you have to pop, or really work a transition.
Cypress was ok because Jeff Ihaxi built the course primarily for the snowboarders, and refused to tone it down too much for the skiers (although he was forced to make the start section easier, and table some of the triples).  Because of that, it became very evident how most of the athletes competing had little or no freestyle background, watching some of them struggle to pump the transitions in the start section was downright embarrassing.
I have nothing but respect for ski racing, and for the racers who decide to do skiercross, they are unbelievably talented athletes. However, it is a terrible shame that skiercross has altered itself to suit the racers, instead of making the racers learn more freestyle skills and deal with more of a "moto" style course, rather than the modified 4man super gs that they mainly use today.
Boardercross did it right, they kept their courses true to a freestyle skill set, and didn't cater to snowboard racers, that's why you barley see any hardbooters in a boardercross anymore.
In skiing, it's like they took a motocross course and modified it so that roadracers could get through it.