CollinWright Active member Aug 3, 2004 #2 not that heavy it all depends on the bindings, but there sick.. Mt. Hood
powfoka Active member Aug 3, 2004 #3 for what they are they r pretty light live to ride , ride to live
*rkp* Active member Aug 3, 2004 #4 yeah they're suprisingly light for a fatter ski. it really depends on the binding cuz i was riding them with the 4frnt binding and they were super heavy but then i mounted my salomon s912 ti's on them and they're super light.
yeah they're suprisingly light for a fatter ski. it really depends on the binding cuz i was riding them with the 4frnt binding and they were super heavy but then i mounted my salomon s912 ti's on them and they're super light.
S shawnm1260 Active member Aug 3, 2004 #5 msp's are one of the lightest fat skis out there...stls just may be the lightest park ski
jksl Active member Aug 3, 2004 #6 yea, they're suprisingly light, the stl's are like fucking feathers, it's crazy! Jeff Poniverus
west Active member Aug 3, 2004 #7 Its a shame...I heard the STLs are pretty sluggish outside the park. better to burn out... ...then fade away
Its a shame...I heard the STLs are pretty sluggish outside the park. better to burn out... ...then fade away
alpentalik Active member Aug 3, 2004 #8 my msps are lighter than trouble makers 4*****~~~~~~~~~~ F*****~~~~~~~~~~ R*****~~~~~~~~~~ N~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ T~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
my msps are lighter than trouble makers 4*****~~~~~~~~~~ F*****~~~~~~~~~~ R*****~~~~~~~~~~ N~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ T~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
west Active member Aug 3, 2004 #10 ^Your right. Do you have a review of the skis? I'd really like to hear some detailed info on them. I'm not being sarcastic....I'm being serious... better to burn out... ...then fade away
^Your right. Do you have a review of the skis? I'd really like to hear some detailed info on them. I'm not being sarcastic....I'm being serious... better to burn out... ...then fade away