Weight of reactors

G

GUITARisLIFE3

New member
does anyone know how many pounds LINE reactors are? either that or the conversion from grams to pounds

lifes a bitch and so am I
 
who the fuck cares, their sick nasty. you cant tell since their under foot, unless your realy realy weak.

OHIO SUPERCOMMANDOS
 
like 8 pounds each or both together is 8 pounds cause if thats it, screw all u people saying its too heavy

lifes a bitch and so am I
 
they feel like nothing when you ski them. unless you have chicken legs you can handle them

--------------------------------

-Jon

go
to jibij
 
they weigh shit fuck a lot and the people who say it weighs nuffin cuz it's underfoot spit bullshit. i've skied 1260's with reactors and with salomon S810ti's. there is SO much difference. plus they explode into eleventy million pieces upon landing, which is no good.

my level of radness... it just can't... be quantified.
 
I reallly dont notice that much differnce from my 810s to reactors but thats me. There is a bit of plastic on the bindings and they have been known to explode but stick to it and within a few years the bindings will be bananas!!

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Skiing isn't a matter of life and death. It's much more important than that!'

I'm sick of following my dreams. I'm just gonna ask where they're going and hook up with 'em later"

 
if ur getting the reactors make sure to put them on lines bc i had to put a plate on my k2s to use reactors on them and it made then super heavy, like u cant carry them w/ one arm heavy

'SKIING IS FOR LITTLE FAT KIDS.'

--RIDE snowboards
 
The weight doesn't matter because it's underfoot so you don't notice it at all when you are spinning

-------------------

Jib and Huck...livin life to the best
 
skogenchick, are you fuckin serious?? the freedom plate doesnt weigh anything at all.

and yes i can feel a difference between my reactors and a pair of salomon s810 tis, but i HATE light bindings now. everytime i ride a light setup i feel too unstable. the reactors make jumping, popping, buttering, triple backflipping no more difficult than with any other binding. dont be such a cunt...to everyone who bitches about weight

--------------------------------

-Jon

go
to jibij
 
dont compare them to salomons...salomons are super light. theyre more comparible to look/rossi

Jeepers Creepers, where'd you get the neat sneakers?!?!

hehehe giggle giggle giggle

 
ok, seriously, if you care that much about the weight of a binding go to a shop, yea haveing light bindings to hike with is nice, but as far as you knee goes and performance goes itll make it worth it...who cares

I wish i was a gangster
 
im not a pussy about weight beleive me im just curious cause i wanted a medium weight ski after coming off of heavy atomic c:3's which arent even twin tips, so ill have a medium weight ski with light 1260s and somewhat heavy reactors

lifes a bitch and so am I
 
8 pounds for both bindings is more than my skis wiegh. One of my skis with a salomon s916 is only barely 7 pounds.

www.highsocietyfreeride.com
 
word to whoever said the weight makes riding seem more stable...thats how it is for me at least. i used to ride 1080's with the s912's..and they were way squirrely on groomers...i now have chronics +reactors and am pretty pleased with them..i weigh 140 pounds and dont have a problem at all skiing them...i like the weight of the bindings when it comes to spinning though..it helps too for stable landings

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top