Watch out now, Nordica Zero's taking over....

J

(Jonesy)

Active member
Sickest ski this year, by far. no ski has more pop, a quicker or better turn shape, or a lighter feel as this one. anyone else second this motion?
 
From what I've heard they sound like sick skis, a symmetrical pow ski. But they won't sell well, you can say that you don't care about the graphics, but the average skier will not buy them because they're so god damn ugly.
 
oh, and they are like 130-104-130 with zero chamber. the really interest me, i love symmertrical sidecut and flex, so that in a bc jib ski? more people should be talking about these skis, i feel like
 
It says they are 122-84-112?

Anyone got the actual dimensions?

And I don't think they are ugly at all, they're a little plain compared to the rest of the lineup, and compared to a lot of skis we're seeing these days, but not ugly by any means.
 
I thought they were 84 under foot and compared to some of Nordicas other poop graphics they're not half bad
 
IMG_0453.jpg

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top