War on Terrorism Death Toll

666

666

Active member
so in the semptember 11th thread the casualtys number was brought up so i decided to do some research and tally the whole war on terrorism casultys, i didnt look for civillians like journalists that got killed in iraq or afganistan cuz they put themsleves there. and these arent exact but close to what the sources say and the sources could always be wrong.

WAR ON TERROISM DEATH TOLL

us civillian deaths: 3,000

us military deaths: 1,000

other coalition deaths: 100-150

total afgan/iraq civillain deaths: 9,100-11,000

total afgan/iraq military killed: almost no information but atleast 10,000 (just thinking logicly) upwards of 150,000

SOURCES

3044 mostly us civillian killed on sept 11

source:
http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11,_2001_Terrorist_Attack/Casualties

867 us soldiers and 972 total coalition forces killed in the afgan campain

source:
http://www.cursor.org/stories/civilian_deaths.htm

andhttp://www.jihadunspun.net/articles/08212002-Casualty.Report/casualty03.html

3000-3400 afgan civillian killed in the afgan campain

source:
http://www.cursor.org/stories/civilian_deaths.htm

unknow amount of afgan millitary killed, no information

337 coalition forces killed in iraq as of sept 8th 03

source:
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2003/iraq/forces/casualties/

6118-7836 iraqi civillians killed in iraq

source:http://www.iraqbodycount.net/bodycount.htm

2,320 iraq military killed in fighting around or in bagdad hopefully total would be higher then the civillian death toll, some conservitive commented 110,000 on real time with bill maher.

source:
http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/L14676551.htm

 
don't remind me.

its terrible.

Me: Yeah, all the hicks and stuff in are school make in the hallway its gross.

Sisters bf: Well, they don't care. Their not leaving town, their just like 'Fuck it.'

Sister: Yeah, thats how i feel about law school right now, 'Fuck it, make out in the hallway.'

 
Props to you my friend for going out and showing us. Is it really worth that many deaths the fight this war on terrorism, do you think that killing saddam hussein is going to help you other than oil prices? i doubt it, hes not behind the mayhem. When last has he played a real threat on us? and killing people only makes it worse, if my brother dies, i want vengance not peace. Is it worth killing this many people? for fucks sake, we can still be scared to shit for the media's pumpin useless crap into your head, that big black mans gonna comeinto your house at night and kill you (burglaries are not committed by race, or by saddam hussein, bombings are done by white people in the usa look at history folks big ass problems who do you have to hold responsible, white men. multi national corporations putting children in unclean un safe working environments are run by white men, why is it that we dont want to stop the homeless man from diing in the cold streets of washington, dont want kids half way aroudn the world to be able to live a pleasent life because companies in our own countries are making it shit, but we feel quite comfortable putting out lives at risk, pissing off terrorists, to attack a country with no valid reasons, proof, or motive, OH WAIT, motive, oil. there you have it. someone give me one good reason to take down saddam, letting people in your own country die, when you have bigger battles to be fighting, poverty, crime rate, gun murders.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Proud Member Of Canada's Drinking Team

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Work Pays off later, Laziness pays off now :D

If you cant say Fu** at least 10 times in one sentence, you must not really be upset.

'blindblinds that was beutiful bro, i love it,' Snonasty
 
quoting the daily show

'...stand by bushs policy. To make something better, you have to kill a part of it'

US is the real terror of the world. I heard a good point by an iraqi citizen. If they came and took over our country, and we rebelled them, would WE be terrorists?

2 Inchers Club

www.kg-archives.com
 
exactly, defense is by no means terrorism.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Proud Member Of Canada's Drinking Team

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Work Pays off later, Laziness pays off now :D

If you cant say Fu** at least 10 times in one sentence, you must not really be upset.

'blindblinds that was beutiful bro, i love it,' Snonasty
 
It doesn't say 110,000 anywhere on that site...

thisis what it says

COMBAT/ATTACKS

United States 195 (64)

Britain 15 (7)

Multinational 0 (1)

NON-COMBAT

United States 94 (72)

Britain 30 (5)

Multinational

IRAQIS KILLED:

MILITARY 2,320#

CIVILIANS Between 6,113 and 7,830*

I might remind you that even 8,000 is not equal to the number 110,000.

- Patrick·patproductions.com

Looks like rain to me.
 
Here you're bitching out on the deaths of 9/11 as a ' result ' of the war on terrorism....Thats not possible...the war on terrorism didn't start until after the war.

By the way I'm glad to know that you sympathize with our troops. Its good to support them.

- Patrick·patproductions.com

Looks like rain to me.
 
mike... if u look i said us military killed in afganistan/iraq =1000 there are 337 coalition killed in iraq about 270 or so are american so i totaled that with round 860 us military casultys in afganistan which is alittle over 1000, like i said i wasent being exact.

capurnicus.... 'Here you're bitching out on the deaths of 9/11 as a ' result ' of the war on terrorism....Thats not possible...the war on terrorism didn't start until after the war'

ill assume that is directed to me and respond

'the war on terrorism didn't start until after the war' for 1 that doesnt make sense ill assume you mean after 911.

the begining of the war on terroism started when the trade towers fell, just like perl harbor was meet by us joining in on ww2, the trade towers was met by us bombing them back, so i consider 911 as the biggening of the war.

im not bitching about the people that died on 911 im not bitching at alll actually im just stating the facts. but if i was to bitch it would be that them killing 3000 of our civillians doesnt justify us killing 10000 of theres.

and ur right it doesnt say 110,000 on that site if you read what i said, 'a conservative on real time with bill maher said 110,000'

that like was the only internet source i could find putting out any number to iraqi or afgany military killed. and it put 2500 or something on estimates of iraqi military killed in and around bagdad

thinking logicly (and hoping for sake of honor) we killed more military then we did civillians in iraq and afganistan... seeing that civillians killed are around 10,000 hopefully that would be the base line for military killed.

and thinking we bombed with percision missiles mostly military targets. i would think there would be military casultys way beyond the civillian casultys.

 
ur right but we cant pull out now without being compleat assholes, we gotta set up a stable goverment for them. but was it worth it our 3000 of our lives worth 10,000 of theres.

 
too fucking high...all that can be said. i was reading time today. i recommend everyone pick up a copy...there's some interesting shit about the bushs' in there. like the fact they have some irab friends they allowed to slip out of the country right after september 11th even though they are associates of al queda. very interesting. they bush commitee also blacked out some info in the case reports for 9/11...info he didn't want others seeing.

SLTskier: there are so many girls in freeskiing now have you noticed that

stowek2: yep..theres a few skilled ones...a good number who love it and want to progress, then a bunch of morons that are trying to impress the boys by wearing as little clothing as possible and as much make-up as possible on the hill

SLTskier: yeah however im one that trys to progress and impress the boys :-)

^That Girl Is Awesome

SRMC
 
yeh i know what balls they had to release that document all blacked out, and they blacked out shit like identifying the terriorsts as suadis, cuz it might offend them, well i dont think the american people for what the report was for care if some motherfuckin suadis are offended.

 
we need to train and put iraqies in charge of gaurdy their water and stuff bacause most iraqies wont mind or do anything if a n american gets killed gaurding it but if the iraqies are attack they'll stand up and say knock the fuck off

'The whole fuckin' world's against us, I swear to God.'

'Sometimes I doubt your commitment to Sparkle Motion.'
 
Is this a debate over whether or not we should kill terrorists or whether or not we should have invaded iraq? And saying the war on terrorism took 3000 us civilians that doesnt really make sence. Its kind of like incinuating we provoked them and they attacked us back and lost 3000 civilans. The point of fucking the world up after we get attacked is to show the world what happens when u kill u.s civilans. Does anyone remember World War 2? The Japanese attacked pearl harbor killing ( i have no idea maybe 1000 troops and a few battleships military targets) And what did we do to retaliate? We dropped two Fission bombs with the intention of mass civilian casualties. I think the figure was nearly 125,000 civilans killed in both nagasaki and hiroshima. Not to mention the after effects of radiation poisoning and cancer. I believe this war was to send a message more or less that we care about our people 200x more than we care about one of yours. Yes the japanese attacked first but we struck back in a magnitude you can't even compare to anything but the holocaust.

The Olson twins are Michelle you sick little baby fuckers.

The Jews invented tornados.
 
ice, its a debate over how we value human life as americans, i think we need to stop looking at this world as nothing more then human, were all human and we all have the same right to live.

and ur mistakin about ww2, go back to your history books. when japan bombed perl harbor we declared war (which we havent done since) becase they were a country that just distroyed almost our entire pacific fleet, and had intentions on concuring us (i really dont know about that part)

but what i do know is why we used the atomic bomb. Japan was obviously going to lose, but the japanese mentality was to fight to the death, and that it wasent the weapons that matterd it was the soul of the warrior, they saw death in battle as honorable.

if we were to try to invade japan like we did with france, every last woman and child would fight us, resulting in HUGE Amounts of casultys, im talking hundreds of thousands. fdr wieghd it carefully and did not take the decision lightly, we had the 2 bombs built for some time already and had not used them. the reason they were used was to convince the japanese emporer that fighting us was usless and we could decimate ther contry from the air. we didnt bomb them for retalation but to end the war.

 
'if we were to try to invade japan like we did with france'

666 we never invaded France. We LIBERATED them. Big difference.

Ice is totally right. The loss of human life is never a good thing, but our government has a responsibility to protect their citizens. By launching this campaingn in the Middle East they're sending a clear message to our enemies that if you target Americans, we're going to come after you.

And Saddam is a threat to the US! Hamas and other terroist organizations are FUNDED by the Iraqi government!

666 since you claim to care so much about human life how can you ignore the fact that Saddam tourtured and killed almost a quarter million of his own citizens? Or is that alright with you?

You have turds for brains.

 
I think we can all agree that world peace can be achieved if these criteria could only be met:

1-Decriminalization of marijuana

2-Criminalization of fat-cat politicians who have the exclusive control of their own salary.

3-Criminalization of lawyers and people's right to sue each other.

4-The notion that white lives are more important than any other.

5-Realization that God is the same idea in every religion.

6-Ban TV.

 
damn arabs, not really that is an arrogant statement, damn terrorist arabs. there we go, thats better

--------------------

i hate posers. thanx to harvey and all who contribute to the site for makin it so kick ass.

if people dont like what ive created, fuck em, because somebody else does-TANNER

can you see what's down there? me either.-seth peering down a cliff before he drops it

 
jibba jabba, i totally agree with your whole post but the 'white lives, more important' comment shocked me..... please explain it

Bent Films

www.canonskiboards.com
 
i think its ridiculous how we assume American lives are more important. if we hadn't been so high and mighty about how good our country is and how bad theirs sucks, and tried maybe helping them this would've never happened.

 
who really started this war? huh, now truly? you think it was 911? hellll no. you guys gotta get your asses out of the fuckin propeganda that the US barinwashed u every day. look around. pick up a history book. the US has been terrorizing the middle east for decades for 'interests in the region' and when, for once, you guys get hit at home, you go ballistic, but forget about the 100 times you did it to the middle east. its fukin bullshit. the world is unfair, why crunch numbers, we all kno that the US has committed the biggest terrorist attacks known to man, why do people try to cover it up anymore?



Moe

-

Pimps Dont Pay Taxes

-

613
 
^moe, I think everyone here would agree with you, so I don't why you say get our heads out of asses.

and canonrider, what I meant by white people being more important was more to the effect of just the Americans being the most valuable lives in the world, even though there is still a lot of belief in this country still that white people hold more value than blacks, but that's a different topic. Sorry to mislead.

 
Please Moe, enlighten me. Break out those history books and give me some examples of how the US has 'terrorized' the Middle East. And don't even try and give me Iraq and Afganistan examples - liberating people from oppresive regimes is not terrorist activity.

I'm waiting Moe.

 
thanks jibba jabba, but did you mean white lives are 'NOT' more improtant then everyone elses? in your first comment you said that we must acheive the notion that white lives are more important then any other.... just wondering, thanks

b

Bent Films

www.canonskiboards.com
 
hey moe I think the holocaust was a little worse than anything we have done. Cultures throughout history you prolly can't find one that hasn't had a scapegoat to kill or treat like shit.

The Olson twins are Michelle you sick little baby fuckers.

The Jews invented tornados.
 
whine, whine, bitch, bitch. is that all you americans ever do? if you hate bush so much why'd you vote for him?

I was born, I know I will die. But, WHATEVER THE FUCK IS IN THE MIDDLE IS UP TO ME!!

This post brought to you by Rob Dunlop 'Keepin it rude and reckless since '83!
 
the whole liberating iraq is bullshit, yeh it may be that were doing that in the process but we didnt go into iraq to liberate them. we went into iraq for terrorists becuase we got attacked, and the oil prospect didnt seem so bad for bushy boy either. HOW MANY FUCKING COUNTRYS ARE WORSE ON HUMAN RIGHTS THAN IRAQ FUCKING EH 2 MILLION PEOPLE WERE MURDERD IN CAMBODIA (or whatever its fucking name was then) BEFORE WE DID SHIT, THERES MANY PLACES IN AFRICA WHERE WORSE HUMAN ATTORCITYS GO ON,

AMERICA IS THE MOST HIPPOCRITCAL NATION EVER

 
the last part went

we support terrorists 1 day then hate them the next, we liberate 1 country thats got a dictator that was a mild violator of human rights compared to others but ignore those in africa which MAME CHILDREN, USE SLAVE LABOR AND COMMITE GENOCIDE ON A DAILY BASES, omg if we actually liberated those countrys we might not be able to have as many dimond rings and our jews might be poor.

 
DAILY genocide people.... its happening right now, cambodia, somalia and nigeria have had wars raging internally that we never hear about. and why? because its no interest to the US.

'ahhh there not hurting us, lets let that problem work itself out. HOLY SHIT WE got bombed? lets 'liberate' the country that did that to us and uhh uhh uhh, saddams a little suspicious looking these days, and he has all that oil, so lets 'liberate' them to.... arent he and osama best freinds? uhh uhh uhh yea, lets use that, thats a good one.'

Its not profitable for the states to go into africa, so they dont do it. they dont care about liberating anyone, why cant people see this.

b

Bent Films

www.canonskiboards.com
 
people do and they dont care because its serving our interest and there is nothing wrong with that. why do we have to be the police for the world?? why can't we do what we want, like most other countries.

concept108 is a fag

 
we didnt start the war, nothing we have done to the middle east compares to what they did to 911, im just as tired as anyone else from hearing people bitching about 911 it happeend like 2 years ago, but comeon y shouldn't the u.s. went to fuck the people that fucked us?

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top