UN to Vote "No-Confidence" in Annan

Graves

Member
All I have to say is that it is about damn time!



Saturday November 20, 2:16 AM

UN staff to vote on no-confidence motion against Annan

UN staff are expected to make an unprecedented vote of no confidence in Secretary-General Kofi Annan, union sources say, after a series of scandals tainted his term in charge of the world body.

The UN staff union, in what officials said was the first vote of its kind in the almost 60-year history of the United Nations, was set to approve a resolution withdrawing support for Annan and senior UN management.

Annan has been in the line of fire over a series of scandals including controversy about a UN aid program that investigators say allowed deposed Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein to embezzle billions of dollars.

Staffers said the trigger for the no-confidence measure was an announcement this week that Annan had pardoned the UN's top oversight official, who was facing allegations of favouritism and sexual harassment.

The union had requested a formal probe into the official, Dileep Nair, after employees accused him of harassing staff and violating UN rules on the hiring and promotion of workers.

Top UN spokesman Fred Eckhard announced on Tuesday that Nair had been exonerated by Annan 'after a thorough review' by the UN's senior official in charge of management, Catherine Bertini.

Annan underlined that he 'had every confidence' in Nair, Eckhard said, but UN employees ridiculed the decision and claimed that investigators had not questioned the staff union, which first raised the complaints in April.

'This was a whitewash, pure and simple,' Guy Candusso, a senior member of the staff union, told AFP.

Candusso noted that Eckhard's declaration to the press had said that 'no further action was necessary in the matter.'

But in a letter sent to the union, a copy of which was obtained by AFP, Annan's chief of staff Iqbal Riza said Nair had been 'advised that he should exercise caution' in future to 'minimize the risk of negative perception.'

In a resolution set to be adopted on Friday, the union said Riza's statement 'substantiates the contention of the staff that there was impropriety' and that there exists 'a lack of integrity, particularly at the higher levels of the organisation.'

The draft resolution, also obtained by AFP, calls on the union president to 'convey this vote of no confidence to the secretary general.'

Staffers who asked not to be named, afraid that speaking out could damage their future in the United Nations, said the Nair decision was an example of corruption by Annan and his senior staff.

They noted that Riza, UN undersecretary general for information Shashi Tharoor and other top officials had served directly under Annan at least since 1994, when he was head of UN peacekeeping operations.

At the time, the United Nations was widely criticized for failing to stop the Rwanda genocide that left 800,000 people dead, even though UN peacekeepers were on the ground -- a catastrophe for which Annan has publicly apologized.

Annan could not be reached for immediate comment. He is currently in Africa on a mission aimed at ending the long-running civil war in Sudan.

But he faces unprecedented calls to resign over the burgeoning scandal about 'oil-for-food,' a UN aid scheme that US investigators say allowed Saddam to siphon off billions of dollars.

The program has tainted UN officials like Benon Sevan, who oversaw the operation and is now accused of pocketing Saddam's money in exchange for turning a blind eye to the Iraqi dictator's abuses.

Annan stands accused of obstructing US investigators, especially since his hand-picked official Paul Volcker this week rejected calls from the US Senate to turn over documents from the program and waive UN staff immunity.

Eckhard, his spokesman, on Thursday said that Annan is expected to serve out his term, which ends in 2006.

Veteran UN staff said this was the first time that employees had risen up to make a vote of no confidence in a sitting secretary general.

'Kofi Annan is surrounded by corruption, a gang of criminals responsible for some of the worst things that happened to mankind in the 20th century,' said one angry staffer, referring to the Rwanda massacres.

'It's possible that he doesn't know directly what has gone on,' said the employee, who has worked for the United Nations for two decades. 'But that's no excuse.'



Good. Kick him to the curb. It is time to restore dignity and pride to the UN.

________________________

Getting it Right In America

Right In America

'Except For Ending Slavery, Facism, Nazism, and Communism War Has Never Solved Anything'

Protest Warrior

Sick of Michael Moore's lies?

MooreWatch

Bush/Cheney '04
 
Step in the right direction... Also, it's another way of going at the problem of adversarial tendencies between the UN and US. If you can't change the admin in the US, shake up the UN. Works for me... provided Bush actually has a bit more confidence in them from now on. Or will he stay 'firm in his principles', as he seems wont to do, and maintain his antagonistic stance? I'm interested to see how the Bush admin plays this hand.

------------

In a haze

A stormy haze

I’ll be around

I’ll be loving you

Always

Always

Here I am

And I’ll take my time

Here I am

And I’ll wait in line

Always

Always...
 
I actually think Bush should endorse Clinton, as Clinton has said he would be highly interested in becoming Secretary General. This would be extremely good for the US considering Clinton's strong international relations and his service to the United States. However, I would like to see Hillary back away from running for the White House in '08 if Bill were to fill the shoes of Annan.

I could not handle two Clintons at once. Besides, I like Bill faaaar better than Hillary.

________________________

Getting it Right In America

Right In America

'Except For Ending Slavery, Facism, Nazism, and Communism War Has Never Solved Anything'

Protest Warrior

Sick of Michael Moore's lies?

MooreWatch

Bush/Cheney '04
 
Heh, US domination of the globe! I agree that it would work, though. I'm not sure there isn't a better choice available. We'll see who's 'in the running' soon enough, I suppose.

------------

In a haze

A stormy haze

I’ll be around

I’ll be loving you

Always

Always

Here I am

And I’ll take my time

Here I am

And I’ll wait in line

Always

Always...
 
I think Bush would be more likely to endorse Clinton for UN Secretary General. Think about it...you're the President of the United States and you need a UN Secretary General you know you can trust. Certainly their policies won't be in alignment but they would be much more similar in proximity than those of Bush/Annan.

If Clinton were Secretary General when we went into Iraq I would be willing to bet that there would be a 99% probability that the UN would be there right now, especially regarding the fact that Clinton's stance on Iraq was actually quite similar to Bush during his Presidency, something people often forget. We would also have more help in Afghanistan. Bush and Clinton certainly do not agree anything, but at least Bush would know Clinton wouldn't turn the UN to the corruption it has encountered under Annan.

Not only would Clinton as Secretary General help straighten out the UN, I believe it would help bring more unity to our country, as the Liberals would feel like they now had a shoulder to lean on.

Again, I would love Clinton to be Secretary General as long as Hillary stays out of the campaign for the White House. If she were to win the White House (which would be next to impossible for her) one family would hold the two of the most powerful, if not the most powerful, positions in the world. Something, that I don't think anyone would agree with.

________________________

Getting it Right In America

Right In America

'Except For Ending Slavery, Facism, Nazism, and Communism War Has Never Solved Anything'

Protest Warrior

Sick of Michael Moore's lies?

MooreWatch

Bush/Cheney '04
 
Hell, if she wins two terms in the white house REGARDLESS of what Bill does, that would make for almost 30 years of the presidency being controlled by two families. Dynastic? Yeah, a bit. It's also kind of scary. It's as if modern politics are leaning further and further away from democracy and closer towards some sort of aristocratic oligarchy (especially given the political power invested in major corporations and lobby groups). Probably not a positive trend.

------------

In a haze

A stormy haze

I’ll be around

I’ll be loving you

Always

Always

Here I am

And I’ll take my time

Here I am

And I’ll wait in line

Always

Always...
 
Lets try again

kofi.gif'


________________________

Getting it Right In America

Right In America

'Except For Ending Slavery, Facism, Nazism, and Communism War Has Never Solved Anything'

Protest Warrior

Sick of Michael Moore's lies?

MooreWatch

Bush/Cheney '04
 
Pretty much.

------------

In a haze

A stormy haze

I’ll be around

I’ll be loving you

Always

Always

Here I am

And I’ll take my time

Here I am

And I’ll wait in line

Always

Always...
 
Here is the article about Clinton eyeing the seat of Secretary General.



Analysis: Clinton eyes U.N. post

By Roland Flamini

UPI Chief International Correspondent

Washington, DC, Oct. 20 (UPI) -- Former U.S. President Bill Clinton has set his sights on becoming U.N. secretary-general. A Clinton insider and a senior U.N. source have told United Press International the 56-year-old former president would like to be named leader of the world body when Kofi Annan's term ends early in 2006.

'He definitely wants to do it,' the Clinton insider said this week.

A Clinton candidacy is likely to receive overwhelming support from U.N. member states, particularly the Third World. Diplomats in Washington say Clinton would galvanize the United Nations and give an enormous boost to its prestige. But the former president's hopes hang on a crucial question that will not be addressed until after the presidential elections: can he get the support of the U.S. government -- a prerequisite for nomination?

The political wisdom is that a second George W. Bush presidency would cut him off at the pass. The notion of Clinton looming large in the international arena from 'the glass tower' in New York would be intolerable to the Bush White House. If Democratic candidate, Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., wins on Nov. 2 the prospect of Clinton as secretary-general won't exactly be welcome either, but Kerry would find it much harder -- if not impossible -- to go against it.

After a Middle East U.N. Secretary-General (Boutros Boutros Ghali) and an African (Kofi Annan) it is generally considered Asia's turn to fill the post, U.N. experts say. No announcement has been made, but behind the scenes China is already pushing the candidacy of Thai Foreign Minister Surakiart Sathirathai, who also seems to have U.S. support. If Clinton does emerge as a candidate, however, China would most likely shift its support, the experts say.

No American has ever been U.N. secretary-general, but the United States is both host country to the United Nations and the major contributor to its budget.

However, the U.S. history with the United Nations has been rocky for decades. President Reagan took the United States out of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization in protest against alleged corruption by former top agency officials in 1984.

A hostile U.S. Congress, which held up payment to the United Nations for years, prevented an attempt by the Clinton administration to re-enter UNESCO in 1995.

In September 2002, President Bush addressed the United Nations and announced the United States would rejoin UNESCO while urging the United Nations to back a resolution authorizing an attack on Iraq.

Clinton is currently recovering from the heart bypass surgery he had to undergo last month, and this has kept him away from the Kerry campaign after a few initial support appearances. The former president has told friends and Kerry staffers he plans to resume campaigning for Kerry, but on a limited scale because his recovery has been gradual. He has talked of his interest in taking over at the United Nations since the publication of his commercially successful autobiography, which he recently said had sold 1.9 million copies. Writing the book kept him busy after leaving office in 2000, but he is now ready to channel his considerable political skills and energy into another role in public life.

There had been rumors that he would run the Third Way organization, the world Social Democratic movement he had talked of launching together with British Prime Minister Tony Blair and German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder. But the political alliance had come unstuck and the idea ran out of steam partly because Blair and Schroeder found themselves on opposite sides in the Bush-led Iraq war.

Putting Clinton in charge of the United Nations would be a real test of international intentions, observers say.

'Critics of the U.N. complain that it's an organization without the muscle and will to put its decisions into effect,' the U.N. source observed. 'There's a good chance that Clinton could significantly change that situation, and then we'll see if the critics mean what they say.'



I disagree with the article though when it states that Bush would try and prevent Clinton from getting the seat. Again it there would be far more logic in endorsing Clinton than taking a chance on having another corrupt internation like Annan take over.

________________________

Getting it Right In America

Right In America

'Except For Ending Slavery, Facism, Nazism, and Communism War Has Never Solved Anything'

Protest Warrior

Sick of Michael Moore's lies?

MooreWatch

Bush/Cheney '04
 
Can you post some links? Where are you getting these articles? People in my poli sci discussion group are wondering.

------------

In a haze

A stormy haze

I’ll be around

I’ll be loving you

Always

Always

Here I am

And I’ll take my time

Here I am

And I’ll wait in line

Always

Always...
 
Back
Top