Trouble Makers

A

all_about_style

New member
I'm going to be buying new skis next season, and I want some oppinions on the trouble makers. I spend most of my time on rails, so I need to know if they hold up

 
Mine haven't help up well at all on rails, I'm losing edges all over the place, so if your looking to do a lot of rails, not tm.

-JMAN-

High North Session 2
 
WOW........ i love my TM's, but if you are a railing fool, as i am, don't get em. my edges fell out soo fast, and i am not sliding on my core. my skis are sooo haggard lookin.

-------------------

'I wanna monster truck, Fuck the bus' - Matt Sterbenz after checkin out the Freezing Point bus.
 
I have never ridden TM's but I have heard nothing but bad about them on rails. They are a light ski with good pop and good for pipe and park but don't go too well with rails.

 
dynastars are butter on rails the base and edge will either pull out or slowly conform to the shape of the rail in the ptex! I recommend new Seth Pistols with double-wide edge or scratch's (as close to dynastar as you could get)

'3030'
 
Yeah, if you're going to be sliding rails, don't get the TM's. I personally don't do rails, but Everyone I talk to says they don't hold up well. For everything else, the TM's are FANTASTIC!! The harder you push them, the better they respond!

I disagree with the post a couple above me saying they are a light ski. They are definately heavier than some of the twins I've been on this season.

---------------

'It's the homeboy shopping network. We got car stereos, we got car alarms, and if you act now...we could probably get the car!'
 
I wanna buy TM. I don´t slide rails so � won´t have too much problems with the edges (only the frecuent stones in my resort) Is TM stiff enough to go well on piste? Which is softer, PE or TM?

 
They are soft as hell but suprising good.

the one down side is you can't go fast in crud cause of how soft they are

your it

you were born free and free you shall remain

 
^I've got a pair of 182 cm with p14 bindings. buy them :)

'can you read what that says?'

'donna simma?'

'yes, that's right. now how would that appear in a phone book?'

'simma, donna?'

'that's right now Simma down na!
 
I´ve ridden Scratch FS and they were soft us gum. I wonder if TMs are as soft as Scratch or stiffer to be better in all mountain terrain

 
The TM's are BY FAR stiffer than the scratches.

Are you guys saying the TM's are soft??

---------------

'It's the homeboy shopping network. We got car stereos, we got car alarms, and if you act now...we could probably get the car!'
 
They ride okay on groomers. But a couple times I went too fast then just yardsaled because they lost control. Or I lost control. Whatever.

 
In my opinion....Absolutly!! I don't understand how people can consider the TM's soft, espcially compaired to the scratches. My brother has this season's FS and they are WAY softer than my TM's.

I had about 25-30 days on them this season in CO, and in my experience the harder and faster I pushed them...the better they held and responded. When I didn't feel like hitting up the park, I loved to find a good cordory groomer and lay down some fast super G turns. They responded great! Incredibly stable and incredibly solid. (I tried this on my brothers Scratches and they wouldn't hold as well....just seemed to 'noodle out' under my feet.)

A friend of mine skis on a pair of Armada's (same size as my Makers) and he commented on how stiff mine were compaired to his AR5's.

So yeah, the TM's are a stiffer ski. Of the people who have skied on them and consider them soft....what are you compairing them too, steel?

---------------

'It's the homeboy shopping network. We got car stereos, we got car alarms, and if you act now...we could probably get the car!'
 
absolutely the harder you ski the trouble maker the more amazing it gets. i got a chance to take mine out west where the trails are longer wider and steeper and it was amazing just to lay em over and make huge fast turns on them.

there's a reason its called snowboarding......it's snowing!!!

-dumbass xgames anouncer
 
Ok, that was my doubt because I had ridden Scrath FS and I didn´t like them because of the softness so I wanted to compare them with TMs. I have ridden 1080 too so if TMs have about the same stiffness I think I´m going on them It´s the cheapest among the three I had selected: TMs 470 $, V-Pro 580 $ and PEs (2005) 630 $ all with Salomon S912 binddings.

 
take a tm pro model... the top sheet is gonna be softer which could help with the edges staying in... i bought tm's last year and my edges fell out but it might be better next year

'party people gather round countdown to the apocolypse, im the kid with the golden arm and the motherfuckin hot nikks'
 
OK, so I ride 8/9 of the time park and pipe 1/9 on normal. And I ski about one week straight in a season pow. So how would they be on that kinda use?

--------------------------

'i think you put the B in buttfuck and i put it in you'

-lateralis

'Screw porn, get a girlfriend'

-PhattTim

 
if you really wanted the best of both worlds you could et the tm's and get the edges under the boot angled so they never really touch the rail

--------

fighting the power since 1995 ...

oh so thats what you call a getaway well tell me what you got away with cuz i'v seen more spine in a gelly fish i'v seen more guts in an 11 year old kid. have another drink and drive your self home .so you can think of me when you forget your seatbelt . and again whn you'r head smashes thro the winsheald .
 
^ edges angled under the boot what are u talkin about??? haha im so confused.

___________________

Keep, Keep on truckin' Yeah....Good Stuff

NO BRIAN, its I before E except after C, an when sounding like a in a neighbor in weigh and on weekends and holidays and all through out may and you'll always be wrong no MATTER WHAT YOU SAY!

You all take luck now! You take luck and care!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top