Mike-O
Active member
But does it mean that these should not be discussed or evaluated in any way? Sure, a best Webisode in skiing can range from something having a good vibe to something having extraordinary skiing, all edited differently in parts and the main result is objective to all.
But what really should be subjective here, in my opinion even with a silly ol' Nippy boner that I've sported for years, is the production values, camera angles, stories, production, scenes, sights, tricks and everything that matters, equally shown.
TC has many a great trick and skier on their roster, but to me some of their last season episodes were a bit too long and thus devoid of great content. Nipwitz on the other hand was short and concise with every webisode, something that kept you craving for more until the next installment.
Both great, but like I said this season NW takes the cake in my books and as you see a few people do agree even in this thread.
				
			But what really should be subjective here, in my opinion even with a silly ol' Nippy boner that I've sported for years, is the production values, camera angles, stories, production, scenes, sights, tricks and everything that matters, equally shown.
TC has many a great trick and skier on their roster, but to me some of their last season episodes were a bit too long and thus devoid of great content. Nipwitz on the other hand was short and concise with every webisode, something that kept you craving for more until the next installment.
Both great, but like I said this season NW takes the cake in my books and as you see a few people do agree even in this thread.
 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
	 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		