Transphobia; Reflection of Society (Woman in Trans draws angry, violent mob)

13415817:californiagrown said:
Why don't you think it is a mental disease? Simple question.

I've told you. Because there's no hard scientific evidence saying otherwise. I've told you that. Fuck you love being a patronizing ass hole. The whole discussion was a hypothetical point of view that if being or trans was a mental disease why it doesn't matter. Seriously read over your posts and look how incoherent your responses were.
 
13415998:Uglyboy said:
I've told you. Because there's no hard scientific evidence saying otherwise. I've told you that. Fuck you love being a patronizing ass hole. The whole discussion was a hypothetical point of view that if being or trans was a mental disease why it doesn't matter. Seriously read over your posts and look how incoherent your responses were.

So what causes people to be transgender? You still keep dancing around the question. I honestly can't tell if you're trolling or not.
 
13416005:californiagrown said:
So what causes people to be transgender? You still keep dancing around the question. I honestly can't tell if you're trolling or not.

I've told you I don't know what causes a person to be trans or gay. Fucking read the thread. I'm not dodging the question. First you wanted me to explain how being trans or gay is formed. Then you wanted me to answer why I don't think being gay or trans is a mental disease. And you just love to get on your condescending attitude "Well you're dodging the question". No I'm fucking not. When you asked whether or not I think it's a disease I answered your question. Then you asked how they came to be, again I answered your fucking question.

Read the thread, you're making yourself look like the biggest dumb cunt.
 
13416009:Uglyboy said:
I've told you I don't know what causes a person to be trans or gay. Fucking read the thread. I'm not dodging the question. First you wanted me to explain how being trans or gay is formed. Then you wanted me to answer why I don't think being gay or trans is a mental disease. And you just love to get on your condescending attitude "Well you're dodging the question". No I'm fucking not. When you asked whether or not I think it's a disease I answered your question. Then you asked how they came to be, again I answered your fucking question.

Read the thread, you're making yourself look like the biggest dumb cunt.

It must suck not being able to think for yourself. If it hasnt been proved you have no thoughts or theories of your own. good luck in the real world, chump.
 
13416009:Uglyboy said:
I've told you I don't know what causes a person to be trans or gay. Fucking read the thread. I'm not dodging the question. First you wanted me to explain how being trans or gay is formed. Then you wanted me to answer why I don't think being gay or trans is a mental disease. And you just love to get on your condescending attitude "Well you're dodging the question". No I'm fucking not. When you asked whether or not I think it's a disease I answered your question. Then you asked how they came to be, again I answered your fucking question.

Read the thread, you're making yourself look like the biggest dumb cunt.

It is unnatural for someone to be trans or even gay. Nature did not intend for that to ever be the case. Even if it's genetic, it's would be a genetic error. Every gay or trans person is unnatural.

Which is dope, being average is overrated.

But unnatural is still unnatural.
 
13416046:californiagrown said:
It must suck not being able to think for yourself. If it hasnt been proved you have no thoughts or theories of your own. good luck in the real world, chump.

Well I'm not going to act like I know how the brain works. Because I don't. I'm not going to make a hypothesis based on shit I don't know. I know however that being gay or trans isn't a mental disorder. You've changed the topic of this discussion so many times. You may be older than me but fuck you're an idiot. You can't have a basic discussion. It's like talking to an idiot with short memory loss. And fuck off with your condescending attitude mate. Real world? I've finished school, I pay rent, I buy my own shit and I just moved to a new country.
 
13416053:Lord_Byron said:
It is unnatural for someone to be trans or even gay. Nature did not intend for that to ever be the case. Even if it's genetic, it's would be a genetic error. Every gay or trans person is unnatural.

Which is dope, being average is overrated.

But unnatural is still unnatural.

Over 1000 species perform same sex mating and pair bonding.
 
13416058:Lord_Byron said:
and those are errors, either genetically, neurologically or environmentally.

What if being gay is evolutions way of dealing with over population. And do I have an error in my brain since I don't want kids?
 
13416054:Uglyboy said:
Well I'm not going to act like I know how the brain works. Because I don't. I'm not going to make a hypothesis based on shit I don't know. I know however that being gay or trans isn't a mental disorder. You've changed the topic of this discussion so many times. You may be older than me but fuck you're an idiot. You can't have a basic discussion. It's like talking to an idiot with short memory loss. And fuck off with your condescending attitude mate. Real world? I've finished school, I pay rent, I buy my own shit and I just moved to a new country.

How do you know it isn't a mental disorder? It hasn't been proven, and I thought you didn't know how the brain works?

Which is it?
 
13415815:Troy. said:
As part of the content team and having the purple name, you become a representative of Newschoolers of sorts. You're currently a horrible representative of this amazing site. That (along with your entire post) is one of the most ignorant things I have read on this website in a really, really long time.

I genuinely hope that at some point in time you realize how fucked what you said is, and you feel terrible about it. But, more than that, I hope you learn how to accept people for who they are.

I love you troy, but I disagree with you. I thought his post was one of the better ones in this thread.

Is it just me or has NSG become too politically correct these days. Any time someone says something that might offend a minority it seems like orange names, purple names and green names come in and do the stern finger waggle synonymous with "I am a higher ranking member and disagree with your viewpoint/find it offensive so I am going to try to shame you". If you guys are really trying to clean up NS, fucking tell us what you will actually tolerate instead of trying to keep up the facade of "it's just skiing and we'll let you guys say what you want provided you don't treat other members like garbage and don't spam the forums"

Lately it seems like more of a "hey we're all a bunch of laid back skiers but don't you ever voice an opinion that contradicts a mod or content creator because shit doesn't fly"

Frankly i am fucking sick of it. Y'all need to get over yourselves.
 
13416063:californiagrown said:
How do you know it isn't a mental disorder? It hasn't been proven, and I thought you didn't know how the brain works?

Which is it?

I don't know how the brain works so I can't make my own hypothesis. Fuck, you just love skewing shit I say. And you just proved my point. I don't think it's a mental disorder because it hasn't been proven to be a mental disorder.

http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2013/06/biological_basis_for_homosexuality_the_fraternal_birth_order_explanation.html
 
13416068:Uglyboy said:
I don't know how the brain works so I can't make my own hypothesis. Fuck, you just love skewing shit I say. And you just proved my point. I don't think it's a mental disorder because it hasn't been proven to be a mental disorder.

http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2013/06/biological_basis_for_homosexuality_the_fraternal_birth_order_explanation.html

then how do you KNOW it is not? you said in no uncertain terms that you know for a fact transgender is not a mental disorder.

You are blind to your own stupidity.
 
13416100:californiagrown said:
then how do you KNOW it is not? you said in no uncertain terms that you know for a fact transgender is not a mental disorder.

You are blind to your own stupidity.

It's called the benefit of the doubt. After reading news and medical reports that there isn't enough scientific evidence to rule that it is a mental disorder so I give the benefit that it isn't.
 
13416059:Uglyboy said:
What if being gay is evolutions way of dealing with over population. And do I have an error in my brain since I don't want kids?

That's been examined and hasn't been shown to be true, disease and starvation seem to be nature's population controls. And yes, you do. Which is fine, errors are fine, but errors are errors.
 
13416114:Uglyboy said:
It's called the benefit of the doubt. After reading news and medical reports that there isn't enough scientific evidence to rule that it is a mental disorder so I give the benefit that it isn't.

so you adjust your rules to fit your pre-exisiting opinions. that is one way to go through life, i guess.
 
13416053:Lord_Byron said:
It is unnatural for someone to be trans or even gay. Nature did not intend for that to ever be the case. Even if it's genetic, it's would be a genetic error. Every gay or trans person is unnatural.

Which is dope, being average is overrated.

But unnatural is still unnatural.

If you knew anything about darwin's theory of evolution you would not be calling it a 'genetic error', genetic mutation occurs spontaneously and traits which are seemingly irrelevant are present in all species. The fact that same-sex attraction occurs in multiple species of today would suggest that it isn't hindering.
 
13416158:californiagrown said:
so you adjust your rules to fit your pre-exisiting opinions. that is one way to go through life, i guess.

dude, you're pulling shit out of your ass. I've explained my point to you yet you refuse to actually partake in a discussion. I thought we were going to discuss that why we shouldn't refer to the LGBT community as a mental disease. But you just wanted to condescend and ask questions which you never asked and basically just be a fuckwit.
 
13416210:90053 said:
If you knew anything about darwin's theory of evolution you would not be calling it a 'genetic error', genetic mutation occurs spontaneously and traits which are seemingly irrelevant are present in all species. The fact that same-sex attraction occurs in multiple species of today would suggest that it isn't hindering.

I happen to have studied the shit out of it!

It's an interesting question, because almost any other genetic mutation is either helpful or hurtful in an organism, and the helpful traits are added over generations and hundreds of thousands of mutations. However, being gay can't be passed down (based on our studies) and that's why im hesitant to call it an outright genetic mutation, there's no evidence of a genetic trail. Being gay might have 0 to do with genetics, we don't really know well enough to draw any conclusions.

What we do know is that nature has developed a complex reproductive system in mammals, and specifically humans, that is designed to work a certain way. Gay people don't have the natural need to reproduce, their sex drive has been adjusted to have 0 interest in the reproductive element of sex. That's an error, and not necessarily a mutation. From a species standpoint, no, it probably doesn't hinder our chances for survival, but it also doesn't help. Straight sex does, at a fundamental level.

Nothing wrong with being gay from a moral standpoint, from a natural perspective, there's definitely something going wrong.
 
13416210:90053 said:
If you knew anything about darwin's theory of evolution you would not be calling it a 'genetic error', genetic mutation occurs spontaneously and traits which are seemingly irrelevant are present in all species. The fact that same-sex attraction occurs in multiple species of today would suggest that it isn't hindering.

Oh, and Darwin came up with the theory of natural selection to explain evolution. He did not come up with the theory of evolution.
 
13416264:Lord_Byron said:
Oh, and Darwin came up with the theory of natural selection to explain evolution. He did not come up with the theory of evolution.

the point still stands, it is a theory regarding evolution even if i got the name wrong
 
13416053:Lord_Byron said:
It is unnatural for someone to be trans or even gay. Nature did not intend for that to ever be the case. Even if it's genetic, it's would be a genetic error. Every gay or trans person is unnatural.

Which is dope, being average is overrated.

But unnatural is still unnatural.

'Natural' and 'unnatural' are entirely human created concepts.
 
13416338:RudyGarmisch said:
'Natural' and 'unnatural' are entirely human created concepts.

Yeah that can be an issue, "nature" is just a placeholder we use for "the universe and all of its mechanics that we can't control".

But, we can say objectively that reproduction and natural selection follow a pattern across all observed mammals, and gay people break that pattern. Maybe "nature" has a reason for breaking that pattern, but it violates our observations for how the world should work.

Honestly i'd love to see some legitimate, non-biased, positively or negatively on human homosexuality. It's a pretty curious element of sexuality that we have no real understanding of. Maybe in the future we'll discover we all have some set of gene's that can make us gay, or its an evolutionary positive to have a percentage of the population be gay, but as of right now, looking at what we know based on scientific observation, being gay does not fit with the rest of how nature "chooses" to work. It's an anomaly.

But don't think I'm saying that's a bad thing in any way, we need less human babies running around needing things like food.
 
13416342:90053 said:
in fact fuck you, i was not wrong in what i said at all

If you're going to try to call someone uneducated on a topic, you had better make sure you know what you're saying.
 
13416261:Lord_Byron said:
I happen to have studied the shit out of it!

13416345:Lord_Byron said:
If you're going to try to call someone uneducated on a topic, you had better make sure you know what you're saying.

for someone so knowledgable about it, it is interesting that you do not regard natural selection as a theory of evolution.
 
13416346:90053 said:
for someone so knowledgable about it, it is interesting that you do not regard natural selection as a theory of evolution.

what? lol.

I said Darwin came up with the theory of natural selection to support the previously constructed theory of evolution. It was technically called "The Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection." Evolution is a process, not even unique to life, we can even observe it in oil molecules in water. Natural selection is a unique mechanism that enables evolution. Some religious people believe in divine intervention, which would be a different mechanism that would still support evolution. They are also idiots.

But they really aren't the same thing.
 
13416351:Lord_Byron said:
what? lol.

I said Darwin came up with the theory of natural selection to support the previously constructed theory of evolution. It was technically called "The Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection." Evolution is a process, not even unique to life, we can even observe it in oil molecules in water. Natural selection is a unique mechanism that enables evolution. Some religious people believe in divine intervention, which would be a different mechanism that would still support evolution. They are also idiots.

But they really aren't the same thing.

You said earlier that darwin did not come up with the theory of evolution, and i agree i never claimed that. You were calling me out for saying 'darwin's theory of evolution' which if anything is just an abbreviation of the title you have just stated.
 
13416356:90053 said:
You said earlier that darwin did not come up with the theory of evolution, and i agree i never claimed that. You were calling me out for saying 'darwin's theory of evolution' which if anything is just an abbreviation of the title you have just stated.

No, you just said what every corn-holing nutlicker who doesn't understand evolution says. "Darwin invented evolution"
 
Back
Top