Too fat for park ?

[TZP]

I'm 5'6 - 5'7 and 135 lbs, do you think I'd be inconfortable riding : Tip/Waist/Tail(mm)125-90-113 for mainly park or would I get used to it ?

 

[InfernoHits]

I like skiing widish skis in park

 

[thefilmerguy]

that ski isn't specifically designed for park i dont think, so im sure you;d get used to it but it wouldnt be as good as a park specific ski

 

[tattooed-n-evil]

i't be fine. I used to have a air of motherships, 182 cm. with a 97 waist. They were fine for the park.

 

[GotamaBCshredder]

I think wider in the park can be better, I think it just adjusts your style and skiing a bit, go for it

 

[CEDARIMAGE]

manim kinda worryed i have 130-98-118 seth vicious and idk how they will be

 

[720laxskier]

you'll be fine

 

[LetItGrow]

i read this title, and thought you were wondering if you weighed to much to ski park. yes.

 

[chapz]

yeah get them

 

[zerospinskier]

well what are the skis? those seem to have quite a bit of difference between tip and tail width, which usually means they arent really the best park skis. but i donno. so what skis are they? that maatters a little more than the actual dimensions

 

[Shopey1080]

my mom is too fat to ride park

 

[stevel]

i thought u were going to say ure too fat to ride park

 

[psychkub]

looks like the chronic blend dimensions... and he was asking what would be better for park, chronics and chronic blends in another thread

 

[uni-corn]

Uh, i dont know. It is a mystery........

 

[Hazard]

the ninthward LT's dimensions are really close to those 125-90-115

 

[boochronic13]

9thwards i rode last year were sick for park.

 

[TheStamos]

Ft skis are dope in the park, i had more fun on jps than Tanners last year.

 

[TWoods]

Do it. you will like them. I don't ski anything below a 90 waist on any day.

 

[billy092]

yeah, what skis are you talking about because a lot of it depends on how the skis handle , soft stiff, etc. but sounds like the chron blends to me

 

[kenevil]

hahaha i thought this thread was about some fat kid who was worried he'd be to fat to ski park

 

[*DrewT*]

what skis are they? I skiied fatter skis than that in the park most of last season it was fine

 

[poofartpee]

no it would not be incomfterbul my friend is 5'5 and rode seth vicious for his park ski and loved it

 

[prosnurfer]

ya last yr i rocked 159 seth pistols wich r some fat fucking skis for how small they are. they were fine for park, they r perfict for landing huge jums and shit. the only down side ur gonna havw is how heavy the skis r. cuz i was mad small and my skis were prety heavy for me. but u should be fine

 

[TWoods]

I thought it was when I first saw it too... ahha

 

[shrEddie]

lolzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

 

[tjski]

ya so were my fujatives. what kind of ninthwards did you have?

 

[cofreeskier]

ya those will be fine-one of my friends rode motherships and hes mainly a park skier and he thought they were great

 

[cork13]

Just go and ski.

If its soft, go all mountain to pow pow.

If its icy, pull out a pair of GS skis.

If its bottomless, something around 130.

If its rocky, something 10 years old.

 

[SteezePatrol]

EVERYONE STOP CALLING HEATH FAT!

 

[Schoening]

heath ate all the food in jdubs RV!

 

[danedegruyter]

Heath can kill it but he usually flattens the jumps and makes the rails ding into the snow a couple feet

 

[tha_CF]

hahahaha same here

 

[steezy-joe]

i think thems r karma dimentions

 

[KeegLove]

definately not to fat, skis are never too fat, or long for that matter.

 

[scratchskier170]

im like the same size and i rode 87mm underfoot all last year and i loved it. gives you more of a surface to land on. i really liked wider skis

 

[BkCountrySkrMO2]

sprayer bc's for park, or whats that sprayer bc that meant for backcountry, i forget the name

 

[Fashion_Geek]

Just make sure you don't go to long....

 

[srwinnsuco]

never such a thing as too fat.

 

[i+am+ghetto]

m2^^^