Tokina 11-16mm vs ______?!

mM*

Member
whatdddup NS. I'm looking into selling some of my lens and stepping up a nice piece of glass. I have a canon rebel t3i and I'm not going to be changing that for a while. The Tokina 11-16mm seems to be my answer because of the price and the great reviews. I mainly will be using it for filming skiing. So my question to you is should stay with the tokina or should I look to invest into a different piece of glass? Any knowledgeable advice ++kk
 
Well, do you need a wide lens? What other lenses do you have?

The 11-16 is a fantastic lens but is only really useful on a glide cam or hand held very close to a feature.
 
Thanks for replying Evan!

I currently own a fisheye, sigma 30mm, and canon 17-85. I'm purchasing a glidecam for next season. I've been doing follow shots with all of my

lens just trying to get a feel and some experience. Should I invest is the 17-40 canon L lens? I've watched your recent video with you filming with the Tonkina and it turned it very nice. But I'm done with my rambling.. Should I get an L lens or the Tonkina?
 
Those are totally different types of lenses. But what I'd personally do is sell the 17-85 and get a 17-50 2.8. 17-40 L is a waste of money, F4, no IS (for $800...) and only goes to 40mm, plus its almost 4x the price. ($200-300 vs $800). Which fisheye do you have
 
Rokinon 8mm, but the distortion is terrible. The Tokinia looks like it has a little bit, but when looking at the Wide Angle "L" series they don't have any.
 
Rokinon 8mm, but the distortion is terrible. The Tokinia looks like it has a little bit, but when looking at the Wide Angle "L" series they don't have any.
 
I have a similiar problem; my rokinnon 8mm is a great lens, i love it, just not for filming skiing. Skatboarding, and mabye some shots very close to a feature, great; on a glidecam, or a 5+ feet away, not so much. Is the tokina worth getting? I know a lot of skiing stuff on here i filmed with it... Thoughts?
 
Not true for a fucking second. You'd never use the rokinon for true landscape stuff, and you'd definitely not use it in low-light situations.

there are other options though, if you're looking to be price conscious, and don't care for the speed, or would like a little more range, look into either the Tokina 12-24 f4 or the Tamron 10-24 f3.5-f4.5.

Both will run around 350-400, and be very good for many of the same shots, with a little more zoom range than the 11-16mm tokina. You'd have a slower lens, but if you're using it for skiing, where you stop down to at least f8, or more if it's sunny, then it will work awesome.
 
Back
Top