to america
- Thread starter rockymountainmilitia
- Start date
The point is, I wasn't arguing. I only replied to SUPilot's posts to point out the logical flaw in his method of argument. Like I originally said, he made a few good points, but made a bunch of stupid statements. Of course, he's way to arrogant to understand that. If he's actually as smart as he seems to think, maybe he should be president... but realistically, you need to listen to hucksterjibber, you look dumber every time you say anything; most recently you've shown yourself to b a racist idiot with a discriminatory perspective on half the people on this site.
I'll say it again. You can't argue. Your arguments look like this: after repeating what the previous poster said, you say 'Open your eyes. look at the facts. Fucking assmonkey stereotype of anti-war people'. Explain to me how that can possibly be regarded as a political argument?!? Stop being a retard.
I wasn't going to bother arguing with you, because you seem to think the president's God, and I already said what I was going to say about Bush in another thread. Plus I'm not sure I like the democratic cantidates any better. But since you people seem to want one, I'll repost my statements here. You want to talk about facts, apparently; you keep posting 'Look at the facts, look at the facts!' (conveniently neglecting to post any).
Sorry to anyone who already read this a month and a half ago.
''I'm pretty sure noone died as a result of Clinton's sex life. However, the fact that the republican party diverted over 200 FBI agents assigned to some portion of the witch hunt to find evidence against Clinton may have-those agents could have been better used to talk to texan flight instructors who complained of foreigners in their schools who didn't want to learn how to take off or land, or how about investigating URGENT reports of planned Al Qaeda attacks? Clinton lied to a court and no one got hurt. Bush lied to a nation and over 9,000 people died. How did he lie?
1. 'Iraq has nuclear weapons.'
Remember that yellow cake uranium from Nigeria Saddam was supposed to have? The head of a a CIA directed mission to investigate concluded the following 'I have little choice but to conclude that some of the intelligence related to Iraq's nuclear weapons program was twisted to exaggerate the threat'. He submitted this to the CIA and it was ignored. The whole hoax wasn't even well executed: the nigerian foreign minister who signed documents involved in the case not only was no longer in power, but hadn't been for over 10 years.And the aluminum tubes that were supposed to be used in making centrifuges nukes? It was concluded by agents of the UN security council that the tubes, 'unless modified, would not be suitable for manufacturing centrifuges.' But Bush didn't let the facts stand in his way, he told his story despite having had his own people report that it was entirely inaccurate un a State of the Union address before 62 million Americans.
2 'Iraq has ties to Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda'
This was said so much that everyone just believes it. In fact, the two of them tried to get to form an alliance in the past, but, as it turned out, they HATED each other; bin Laden completely disagreed with Hussein's religious and political views. That Al Qaeda poison and explosives factory in northern iraq that Bush officials said Saddam had been harbouring? it belonged to a fundamentalist group who had officially declared Hussein their 'enemy'. The truth is there was no connection; there was not even one Iraqi among the 9/11 hijackers. In fact, 15 of them were Saudis, but you didn't hear anything about 'Saudi Arabia attacking the US'. Why not? Hell, Osama himself is a Saudi! Who does have a connection with Osama? How about George W. Himself! Osama's family has been investing in bush family texas oil ventures since 1977. Little known fact, the Bin Ladens are one of the richest families on earth, and worked closely with the bushes. When George Sr. became a consultant for the carlyle group, they immediately donated 2$million. In fact, another of Osama's brothers was at a carlyle group conference in washington DC the morning of, you guessed it, 9/11. but here's another reason you wont hear it implied that the Saudis were the attackers: Bush has a very close relationship witht eh Saudi royal family. For god's sake, George Sr. calls the prince of Saudi Arabia by a nickname: Bandar Bush! Now, you'd think THIS regime would be good enough to take out; according to Amnesty International, In SArabia, 'Gross human rights violations continued...hundreds of suspected religious activists and critics of the state were arrested...Torture and ill treatment remained Rife'. In 2000, 125 people were beheaded in Riyadh, the capital city. Sounds likea nasty place. Guess we need their oil.
Less than a week after the september 11 attacks, Bush went out on his balcony at the White House to relax and smoke a cigar. He had afriend join him out there, and told him 'If we can't get them (The Al Qaeda operatives suspected of being involved in the attack) to cooperate, we'll hand them over to you.' The man joining him was his good friend, the Prince of Saudi Arabia. Bandar Bush.
2. It's not JUST the U.S. Going to war, it's a coalitiioin of the 'willing'
Some of the participants in this 'coalition' are a joke. listed among them is Palau, and Island with 20,000 people. They sent no troops. Albania, a rural backwater farm country. They sent no troops. Afghanistan. You gotta be kidding me! Thanks to bush, their whole country is on average about 2 feet lower! They sent no troops. Poland did offer to send 200 men! I'm sure that helped. Oh, and morroco offered 2000 monkeys to help detonate landmines (an offer which was refused).
Larger countries who volunteered weren't really worth calling 'willing'. 70% of Australian citizens opposed the war, but for a little incentive, or threatening, the US shut New Zealand (who refused to join the coalition) out of trade talks. Aussies, you better join up, or else! How about Italy? 69% opposed. Japan? 70% opposed. Spain! only 13% of spaniards were in favour of war, and that was only if it had UN support! Turkey, 95% opposed. How about the U.K.? The steadfast ally of the US? Polls showed that only 9% of UK citizens were in favour of war if it meant the US and UK going it alone. Well put whoever you want on a list, you WERE in it alone.
3. 'We are doing everything in our power to minimize civilian casualties.'
How's this for an idea. If you want people around the world to stop hating the US, stop killing their civilians and calling it 'collateral damage'! Gee, sorry we blew up your home, but hey, shit happens, ok? Is that what they told the child they caught on film who lost his parents and both of his arms when a US missile struck his home, as he begged reporters to help him find his arms? Oh sorry, I guess they don't show that kind of footage on Fox. You probably didn't see Razek al-Kazem al-Khafaji, either, who, as he stood in the rubble of his home amidst the scattered body parts of his wife, six children, father, mother and two brothers (all killed by one U.S. attack), asked God to 'Take our revenge on America'.
Gee, I wonder why they're so hateful! Ingrates.
4. The war is getting fair and accurate coverage.
While we're on the subject of what you may have seen on TV, how's this: the White house field office, AKA Fox news, wasn't exactly impartial. In fact, FAIR, an independant media research group, reported the following statistics after seeing over 1600 sources appearing in on camera stories about Iraq.
-You were 25 times more likely to see a pro-war US source than an anti-war one.
-Military sources were featured twice as frequently as civilians
-Only 4% of sources were affiliated with Universities or other non-governmental organizations.
-of 840 US sources who were current or former government or military officials, 4 were identified as opposing the war. Yeah, 4.
-Anti-war statements were consistently limited to 1 second sound bites.
-None of the six major telecasts conducted a sit-down interview with anyone who opposed the war.
You want to argue that Bush has been a model President? then argue against the facts. And those are facts, backed up by documented sources. And did he lie to America? Well, the Bush administration doesn't think so. Condoleeza rice said that 'The president's state of the union said something inaccurate...if you notice, the president's statement says 'sought'. (sought that yellow cake uranium, she means)-it didn't say he received or acquired.' Hey, that's true. So Bush TRICKED his country into thinking Saddam had nuclear weapons? The blame-passing for the innacuracies in that speech went on until Bush finally said that he was responsible for any words that came out of his mouth. Sad that he actually had to say that, it seems pretty obvious.
So the next time the Bush administration gives you something like what Powell gave us when he said 'every statement I make today is backed up by sources, solid sources. These are not assertions. What we are giving you are facts and conclusions based on solid Intelligence', you should take it with a grain of salt. Especially since two days earlier, while reviewing that 'solid intelligence' concerning Saddam with CIA officials, Powell threw the papers in the air and announced, 'I'm not reading this. This is bullshit!'
So spew all you want about Bush doing a 'good job', being a moral guy, and an upstanding President. The facts are in opposition, and US allies are dwindling right along with support for its beloved leader, King George. God bless America, because America needs all the help it can get.''
J.D.'s Hall of Fame for Stupid Posts:
''mad trix is a gay name. go with the k2's.'' -Linepunk
''Dude, Americans or Canadians didn't invent english, the British dudes did.'' -Chauncy
On San Francisco: ''that was like the starting place of gayness and aids in the eighties.'' -Tandan83
I'll say it again. You can't argue. Your arguments look like this: after repeating what the previous poster said, you say 'Open your eyes. look at the facts. Fucking assmonkey stereotype of anti-war people'. Explain to me how that can possibly be regarded as a political argument?!? Stop being a retard.
I wasn't going to bother arguing with you, because you seem to think the president's God, and I already said what I was going to say about Bush in another thread. Plus I'm not sure I like the democratic cantidates any better. But since you people seem to want one, I'll repost my statements here. You want to talk about facts, apparently; you keep posting 'Look at the facts, look at the facts!' (conveniently neglecting to post any).
Sorry to anyone who already read this a month and a half ago.
''I'm pretty sure noone died as a result of Clinton's sex life. However, the fact that the republican party diverted over 200 FBI agents assigned to some portion of the witch hunt to find evidence against Clinton may have-those agents could have been better used to talk to texan flight instructors who complained of foreigners in their schools who didn't want to learn how to take off or land, or how about investigating URGENT reports of planned Al Qaeda attacks? Clinton lied to a court and no one got hurt. Bush lied to a nation and over 9,000 people died. How did he lie?
1. 'Iraq has nuclear weapons.'
Remember that yellow cake uranium from Nigeria Saddam was supposed to have? The head of a a CIA directed mission to investigate concluded the following 'I have little choice but to conclude that some of the intelligence related to Iraq's nuclear weapons program was twisted to exaggerate the threat'. He submitted this to the CIA and it was ignored. The whole hoax wasn't even well executed: the nigerian foreign minister who signed documents involved in the case not only was no longer in power, but hadn't been for over 10 years.And the aluminum tubes that were supposed to be used in making centrifuges nukes? It was concluded by agents of the UN security council that the tubes, 'unless modified, would not be suitable for manufacturing centrifuges.' But Bush didn't let the facts stand in his way, he told his story despite having had his own people report that it was entirely inaccurate un a State of the Union address before 62 million Americans.
2 'Iraq has ties to Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda'
This was said so much that everyone just believes it. In fact, the two of them tried to get to form an alliance in the past, but, as it turned out, they HATED each other; bin Laden completely disagreed with Hussein's religious and political views. That Al Qaeda poison and explosives factory in northern iraq that Bush officials said Saddam had been harbouring? it belonged to a fundamentalist group who had officially declared Hussein their 'enemy'. The truth is there was no connection; there was not even one Iraqi among the 9/11 hijackers. In fact, 15 of them were Saudis, but you didn't hear anything about 'Saudi Arabia attacking the US'. Why not? Hell, Osama himself is a Saudi! Who does have a connection with Osama? How about George W. Himself! Osama's family has been investing in bush family texas oil ventures since 1977. Little known fact, the Bin Ladens are one of the richest families on earth, and worked closely with the bushes. When George Sr. became a consultant for the carlyle group, they immediately donated 2$million. In fact, another of Osama's brothers was at a carlyle group conference in washington DC the morning of, you guessed it, 9/11. but here's another reason you wont hear it implied that the Saudis were the attackers: Bush has a very close relationship witht eh Saudi royal family. For god's sake, George Sr. calls the prince of Saudi Arabia by a nickname: Bandar Bush! Now, you'd think THIS regime would be good enough to take out; according to Amnesty International, In SArabia, 'Gross human rights violations continued...hundreds of suspected religious activists and critics of the state were arrested...Torture and ill treatment remained Rife'. In 2000, 125 people were beheaded in Riyadh, the capital city. Sounds likea nasty place. Guess we need their oil.
Less than a week after the september 11 attacks, Bush went out on his balcony at the White House to relax and smoke a cigar. He had afriend join him out there, and told him 'If we can't get them (The Al Qaeda operatives suspected of being involved in the attack) to cooperate, we'll hand them over to you.' The man joining him was his good friend, the Prince of Saudi Arabia. Bandar Bush.
2. It's not JUST the U.S. Going to war, it's a coalitiioin of the 'willing'
Some of the participants in this 'coalition' are a joke. listed among them is Palau, and Island with 20,000 people. They sent no troops. Albania, a rural backwater farm country. They sent no troops. Afghanistan. You gotta be kidding me! Thanks to bush, their whole country is on average about 2 feet lower! They sent no troops. Poland did offer to send 200 men! I'm sure that helped. Oh, and morroco offered 2000 monkeys to help detonate landmines (an offer which was refused).
Larger countries who volunteered weren't really worth calling 'willing'. 70% of Australian citizens opposed the war, but for a little incentive, or threatening, the US shut New Zealand (who refused to join the coalition) out of trade talks. Aussies, you better join up, or else! How about Italy? 69% opposed. Japan? 70% opposed. Spain! only 13% of spaniards were in favour of war, and that was only if it had UN support! Turkey, 95% opposed. How about the U.K.? The steadfast ally of the US? Polls showed that only 9% of UK citizens were in favour of war if it meant the US and UK going it alone. Well put whoever you want on a list, you WERE in it alone.
3. 'We are doing everything in our power to minimize civilian casualties.'
How's this for an idea. If you want people around the world to stop hating the US, stop killing their civilians and calling it 'collateral damage'! Gee, sorry we blew up your home, but hey, shit happens, ok? Is that what they told the child they caught on film who lost his parents and both of his arms when a US missile struck his home, as he begged reporters to help him find his arms? Oh sorry, I guess they don't show that kind of footage on Fox. You probably didn't see Razek al-Kazem al-Khafaji, either, who, as he stood in the rubble of his home amidst the scattered body parts of his wife, six children, father, mother and two brothers (all killed by one U.S. attack), asked God to 'Take our revenge on America'.
Gee, I wonder why they're so hateful! Ingrates.
4. The war is getting fair and accurate coverage.
While we're on the subject of what you may have seen on TV, how's this: the White house field office, AKA Fox news, wasn't exactly impartial. In fact, FAIR, an independant media research group, reported the following statistics after seeing over 1600 sources appearing in on camera stories about Iraq.
-You were 25 times more likely to see a pro-war US source than an anti-war one.
-Military sources were featured twice as frequently as civilians
-Only 4% of sources were affiliated with Universities or other non-governmental organizations.
-of 840 US sources who were current or former government or military officials, 4 were identified as opposing the war. Yeah, 4.
-Anti-war statements were consistently limited to 1 second sound bites.
-None of the six major telecasts conducted a sit-down interview with anyone who opposed the war.
You want to argue that Bush has been a model President? then argue against the facts. And those are facts, backed up by documented sources. And did he lie to America? Well, the Bush administration doesn't think so. Condoleeza rice said that 'The president's state of the union said something inaccurate...if you notice, the president's statement says 'sought'. (sought that yellow cake uranium, she means)-it didn't say he received or acquired.' Hey, that's true. So Bush TRICKED his country into thinking Saddam had nuclear weapons? The blame-passing for the innacuracies in that speech went on until Bush finally said that he was responsible for any words that came out of his mouth. Sad that he actually had to say that, it seems pretty obvious.
So the next time the Bush administration gives you something like what Powell gave us when he said 'every statement I make today is backed up by sources, solid sources. These are not assertions. What we are giving you are facts and conclusions based on solid Intelligence', you should take it with a grain of salt. Especially since two days earlier, while reviewing that 'solid intelligence' concerning Saddam with CIA officials, Powell threw the papers in the air and announced, 'I'm not reading this. This is bullshit!'
So spew all you want about Bush doing a 'good job', being a moral guy, and an upstanding President. The facts are in opposition, and US allies are dwindling right along with support for its beloved leader, King George. God bless America, because America needs all the help it can get.''
J.D.'s Hall of Fame for Stupid Posts:
''mad trix is a gay name. go with the k2's.'' -Linepunk
''Dude, Americans or Canadians didn't invent english, the British dudes did.'' -Chauncy
On San Francisco: ''that was like the starting place of gayness and aids in the eighties.'' -Tandan83
SUpilot
Active member
gotcha...JD May, do you think you could teach me to copy and paste too?
Oh, please do lower your speech to my humble level, oh great and intellectual one, for I am unworthy to bear witness to the truths you speak! Since I am clearly your inferior, you must write in very lowbrow terms or I'll never understand. --JD May
Oh, please do lower your speech to my humble level, oh great and intellectual one, for I am unworthy to bear witness to the truths you speak! Since I am clearly your inferior, you must write in very lowbrow terms or I'll never understand. --JD May
It's actually really easy, provided you wrote something insightful earlier. Are you actually dumb enought o think I shouldn't get credit for my writing just because I didn't originally post it in this thread?
...wow.
J.D.'s Hall of Fame for Stupid Posts:
''mad trix is a gay name. go with the k2's.'' -Linepunk
''Dude, Americans or Canadians didn't invent english, the British dudes did.'' -Chauncy
On San Francisco: ''that was like the starting place of gayness and aids in the eighties.'' -Tandan83
...wow.
J.D.'s Hall of Fame for Stupid Posts:
''mad trix is a gay name. go with the k2's.'' -Linepunk
''Dude, Americans or Canadians didn't invent english, the British dudes did.'' -Chauncy
On San Francisco: ''that was like the starting place of gayness and aids in the eighties.'' -Tandan83
SteveXs2
Active member
Holy shit, I just wrote a huge thing on Softwood Lumber and Bulk Water and shit like that, and it said 'You must enter something to post' and I lost it all. I'll summarize the ending though:
J.D_may = hero
SUPilot = fucking asshole
US Gov = fucking assholes
GWBush = moron
--------------------
'Schmuck...Cruella has garbage can pussy.'
--> Alpentalik
gethyped.net
J.D_may = hero
SUPilot = fucking asshole
US Gov = fucking assholes
GWBush = moron
--------------------
'Schmuck...Cruella has garbage can pussy.'
--> Alpentalik
gethyped.net
The ''back'' button on your browser might help with that... at least, on my browser, the text is still there when I hit back.
J.D.'s Hall of Fame for Stupid Posts:
''mad trix is a gay name. go with the k2's.'' -Linepunk
''Dude, Americans or Canadians didn't invent english, the British dudes did.'' -Chauncy
On San Francisco: ''that was like the starting place of gayness and aids in the eighties.'' -Tandan83
J.D.'s Hall of Fame for Stupid Posts:
''mad trix is a gay name. go with the k2's.'' -Linepunk
''Dude, Americans or Canadians didn't invent english, the British dudes did.'' -Chauncy
On San Francisco: ''that was like the starting place of gayness and aids in the eighties.'' -Tandan83
SteveXs2
Active member
^ Tried when i told me to do it, didn't help, my many paragraphs of writing, all gone.
--------------------
'Schmuck...Cruella has garbage can pussy.'
--> Alpentalik
gethyped.net
--------------------
'Schmuck...Cruella has garbage can pussy.'
--> Alpentalik
gethyped.net
^I hate it when then happens... lost a term paper a few months ago. I hate rewriting.
J.D.'s Hall of Fame for Stupid Posts:
''mad trix is a gay name. go with the k2's.'' -Linepunk
''Dude, Americans or Canadians didn't invent english, the British dudes did.'' -Chauncy
On San Francisco: ''that was like the starting place of gayness and aids in the eighties.'' -Tandan83
''I've learned to give some canadians an intellectual buffer'' -SUpilot
''dude i am literat i just cant spell worth shit u got prob with it bitch'' -Bridgerbowlskier
J.D.'s Hall of Fame for Stupid Posts:
''mad trix is a gay name. go with the k2's.'' -Linepunk
''Dude, Americans or Canadians didn't invent english, the British dudes did.'' -Chauncy
On San Francisco: ''that was like the starting place of gayness and aids in the eighties.'' -Tandan83
''I've learned to give some canadians an intellectual buffer'' -SUpilot
''dude i am literat i just cant spell worth shit u got prob with it bitch'' -Bridgerbowlskier
rockymountainmilitia
Active member
Whoa guys, alot of shit gotten spewed, by no means do I hate the states, You guys got a great country, and nice country men. Well except for SUpilot, hes fucken retarded, but anyways no point on mentioning his name, paying attention to him just inflats his ego and makes him more of an arrognat asshole. I based my entire first statement off of veiws of people ive met from various countries. Really there is alot of antiamerican shit going on everywhere. And ya wonder why. THE WERE NO WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION IN IRAQ. You went in a fucked a country who had nothing to protect itself with. Thats like pushing the kid in a wheelchair down a big hill into a wall. Sure Saddam was a horrible dictator, but reall the whole reason america went into iraq was to get out weapons which there were non. The media covrage you recieve in the states is completely what your government wants you too see. Theres alot more shit that you'll learn if check out how things work and are done in other parts of the world. I cant be fucked writing this, im going surfing.
WHERE ARE YOU HOIET
WHERE ARE YOU HOIET
SofaKingdom
Member
Yes. There's a lot of shit going down most americans can't see or hear. But tell me, what the fuck is your reliable source of information that you know for a God damned fact that they do not have weapons? We're all blinded from the truth by our arrogant opinions on what we believe is right and lack of information.
'I bought an antfarm once. Them fellers didn't grow shit'.
'I bought an antfarm once. Them fellers didn't grow shit'.
SUpilot
Active member
thats the problem...
it will take another 9/11 for them to be content. you can never win with people like them and the confide after it is to late. woulda shoulda coulda my friend.
Oh, please do lower your speech to my humble level, oh great and intellectual one, for I am unworthy to bear witness to the truths you speak! Since I am clearly your inferior, you must write in very lowbrow terms or I'll never understand. --JD May
it will take another 9/11 for them to be content. you can never win with people like them and the confide after it is to late. woulda shoulda coulda my friend.
Oh, please do lower your speech to my humble level, oh great and intellectual one, for I am unworthy to bear witness to the truths you speak! Since I am clearly your inferior, you must write in very lowbrow terms or I'll never understand. --JD May
Lord_Piot
Active member
3) Inability to get the right person in office? The right people are in office and the majority of the country supports bush.
No they didnt...He lost the popular vote therefor the majority DOES not support him
Face it SUPilot those 'we stand united' T-shirts wont get you too far...soon enough the whole world will be your terrorist....
Or maybe look at it the other way...Who invaded 2 countries in the last few years? who actually has WMD(hate this fucking term), who gives WMD to israel? Who slaugtered 3000 of its own citizens?
The answer to all these questions is the US... The worlds only terrorist state.
____________________
I HATE NIGGERS.
No they didnt...He lost the popular vote therefor the majority DOES not support him
Face it SUPilot those 'we stand united' T-shirts wont get you too far...soon enough the whole world will be your terrorist....
Or maybe look at it the other way...Who invaded 2 countries in the last few years? who actually has WMD(hate this fucking term), who gives WMD to israel? Who slaugtered 3000 of its own citizens?
The answer to all these questions is the US... The worlds only terrorist state.
____________________
I HATE NIGGERS.
hucksterjibber15
Active member
ok sofa kingdom, you are in a world of our own. i said that most, not all, americans are easily swayed by the media, and tend to go along with whatever they say, and whatever most of the population beleives, so they dont feel like they are alone in the fight. look at iraq itself, its a not so good example, but still an example. all of the people were too scared to speak their mind about the government, but now, as it has been disabled, bullshit or not, they will talk how they feel. i know that thats an exaggerated example, but its the only one that comes to mind right now. j.d. is the only person supplying legit arguements here, and its the sad reallity that he is right, the us is a fucking terrorist loving country , who thinks that since it is the world superpower, that it can go in an do as it sees necessary, terrorizing the lives of american soldiers, and the people of iraq. its sad but its the reality. it really sucks not being able to have pride in your country, but its hard to when so many people are dying every day, for an unknown cause. fuck america, and its terrorist ways.
if people dont like what ive created, fuck em, because somebody else does-TANNER
can you see what's down there? me either.-seth peering down a cliff before he drops it
ns army, whatever is right below the general
I go either way-elasmoskichick
if people dont like what ive created, fuck em, because somebody else does-TANNER
can you see what's down there? me either.-seth peering down a cliff before he drops it
ns army, whatever is right below the general
I go either way-elasmoskichick
562056961108
New member
YEa here is something that we should be worried about... not just the US, but the world. WHat if North Korea begins to threaten America and it leads to war, would a war be justafiable then? I think that the Iraq war is stupid, But the North KOrea conflict might be the end of us. Would you support war then?
CANDY BAR!
CANDY BAR!
Mykel
Active member
no way, we should stay away from north korea, they won't nuke us, there good people. Beside who are we to go out and start wars with people that will exterminate our entire country. I say let them nuke us and if there are any americans left, then we can go over and fight the koreans.
that may not have come across as sarcastic as I had hoped
Micheal Earl Willard
that may not have come across as sarcastic as I had hoped
Micheal Earl Willard
Jib_This
Active member
Maybe the US would be better off figuring out WHY it's a target, and then trying to change some of its behaviours in order to minimize risks.
If a few people at school don't like me, and I buy a gun, am I safer? No, all it leads to is having the people who don't like me buy guns, possibly ones that are bigger than mine. So I buy a bigger gun. And...congratulations, we have an arms race. Sound familiar anyone?
The US would be better off if it were willing to take the first few steps in making itself less of a target alone, rather than being hypocritical about the whole thing.
TMC WUUUUUUUUUUUUUT
WE KILL YOU
SKIER: How would you describe your style?
PJ Cliche: Total skate influence. Even doh dis is on concrete, an you are face sideways, an it has sweet fuck all to do with ski, skate 'as play a huge role wit my steeze.
If a few people at school don't like me, and I buy a gun, am I safer? No, all it leads to is having the people who don't like me buy guns, possibly ones that are bigger than mine. So I buy a bigger gun. And...congratulations, we have an arms race. Sound familiar anyone?
The US would be better off if it were willing to take the first few steps in making itself less of a target alone, rather than being hypocritical about the whole thing.
TMC WUUUUUUUUUUUUUT
WE KILL YOU
SKIER: How would you describe your style?
PJ Cliche: Total skate influence. Even doh dis is on concrete, an you are face sideways, an it has sweet fuck all to do with ski, skate 'as play a huge role wit my steeze.
Jib_This
Active member
Maybe the US would be better off figuring out WHY it's a target, and then trying to change some of its behaviours in order to minimize risks.
If a few people at school don't like me, and I buy a gun, am I safer? No, all it leads to is having the people who don't like me buy guns, possibly ones that are bigger than mine. So I buy a bigger gun. And...congratulations, we have an arms race. Sound familiar anyone?
The US would be better off if it were willing to take the first few steps in making itself less of a target alone, rather than being hypocritical about the whole thing.
TMC WUUUUUUUUUUUUUT
WE KILL YOU
SKIER: How would you describe your style?
PJ Cliche: Total skate influence. Even doh dis is on concrete, an you are face sideways, an it has sweet fuck all to do with ski, skate 'as play a huge role wit my steeze.
If a few people at school don't like me, and I buy a gun, am I safer? No, all it leads to is having the people who don't like me buy guns, possibly ones that are bigger than mine. So I buy a bigger gun. And...congratulations, we have an arms race. Sound familiar anyone?
The US would be better off if it were willing to take the first few steps in making itself less of a target alone, rather than being hypocritical about the whole thing.
TMC WUUUUUUUUUUUUUT
WE KILL YOU
SKIER: How would you describe your style?
PJ Cliche: Total skate influence. Even doh dis is on concrete, an you are face sideways, an it has sweet fuck all to do with ski, skate 'as play a huge role wit my steeze.
SUpilot
Active member
I.E. JD May's grudge against SUpilot?
Oh, please do lower your speech to my humble level, oh great and intellectual one, for I am unworthy to bear witness to the truths you speak! Since I am clearly your inferior, you must write in very lowbrow terms or I'll never understand. --JD May
Oh, please do lower your speech to my humble level, oh great and intellectual one, for I am unworthy to bear witness to the truths you speak! Since I am clearly your inferior, you must write in very lowbrow terms or I'll never understand. --JD May
