no, camber is the contact point to contact point concave on the base. It provides pop and more responsive movement. Reverse camber is if the base was convex, thus making the base convex from contact point to contact point.
Those are definatly reverse camber, I have seen pics of Seth and Benchetler using them. Even if they are just being "held at an angle", the contact points would touch, wouldn't they? unless it was reverse camber.....
Those are definatly reverse camber, I have seen pics of Seth and Benchetler using them. Even if they are just being "held at an angle", the contact points would touch, wouldn't they? unless it was reverse camber.....