Bo-
Member
That's because no woman has ever been recognized. Seriously, the art history has been EXTREMELY preferable to men.
Women can be just as good artists as men, it's impossible to lower this question to a gender matter in the first place. I mean, in the days when michelangelo was popular there was NO FUCKING WAY that a woman attempting sculturing would be recognized.
Why? because women were degraded, looked upon as only worthy house work.
Let's change that. I for one thinks that art without autographs is the solution. Erases all the fucked up "concept art" and all that other bullshit that some wacked up elite with conjac glasses recognizes as art.
				
			Women can be just as good artists as men, it's impossible to lower this question to a gender matter in the first place. I mean, in the days when michelangelo was popular there was NO FUCKING WAY that a woman attempting sculturing would be recognized.
Why? because women were degraded, looked upon as only worthy house work.
Let's change that. I for one thinks that art without autographs is the solution. Erases all the fucked up "concept art" and all that other bullshit that some wacked up elite with conjac glasses recognizes as art.