THERMITE WTC 9/11

srwinnsuco

Active member
Thermite



By John S. Hatch



April 14, 2009 "Information Clearing House" -- -A

recent article published in the respected peer-reviewed Open Chemical

Physics Journal by nine noted scientists offers incontrovertible proof

that the dust from the Twin Towers and Building Seven of the World

Trade Center contains small intact samples of Thermite.



Thermite is a highly explosive agent consisting mostly of aluminum and

iron oxide, and is used to cut steel in building controlled

demolitions, and is also used in welding and in military applications.



Using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, X-ray energy

dispersive spectroscopy, and differential scanning calorimetry, the

scientists were able to determine that the Thermite present is of a

specialized type called Nano-thermite or Superthermite. It burns hotter

and has a lower ignition temperature than normal Thermite, and is

produced at laboratories such as Lawrence Livermore, incidentally

thought to be the same lab that produced the anthrax sent out shortly

after 9/11.



Nano-thermite could not be accidentally present in dust samples

collected at four different sites, nor could it be the result of

clean-up operations at ground zero, as one of the samples was retrieved

a mere ten minutes or so after the collapse of the second tower. All

samples show the same consistency.



This would explain the streams of molten steel (not aluminum) falling

from one of the towers, and the fact that steel remained molten in the

rubble for more than a month after the event. There is no scientific

explanation for this other than the use of Thermite, which can achieve

temperatures of 3500 C, while under ideal conditions jet fuel can

achieve just approximately 285 C. It would also explain the otherwise

physically impossible near freefall speed of the three buildings, and

how they were able to fall so homogeneously.



So what does it mean? It means that there is proof (which so far no one

has attempted to refute) that the WTC buildings (and more than three

thousand lives, counting the ongoing deaths of first responders and

ordinary NYC citizens caused by the dust) were brought down by

controlled demolition in a planned and purposeful manner by elements of

the Bush Administration, most likely as a ‘catalyzing event’ , the new

Pearl Harbor’ fondly mentioned by neo-con PNAC (Plan for the New

American Century) and designed to galvanize American citizens in

support of attacking other nations and restricting human rights at

home. ‘Full Specter Domination’.



This was the excuse or invading Afghanistan and Iraq (there were plans

for Syria and Iran as well, and perhaps others), for justifying

domestic spying, disappearances, torture, and murder. Murder based on

lies and deception, and the killing of American citizens.



Knowing, as he must by now, that 9/11 was conceived and executed not

from some dark cave in Afghanistan, but much more likely from some deep

bunker in dank Cheneystan, will President Obama still insist on

‘looking ahead’? Just how deep is America’s reserve of dismissal and

denial?



I feel for all the victims of 9/11, past, present and future, but was

especially haunted by those poor souls who chose to jump to their

deaths, or who fell. Surely the people who did this need to be brought

to justice. Otherwise America is not ‘looking ahead’. She has her eyes

shut tight while she babbles inanities.

if anyone wants to check out the full report
http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM

 
anybody who still thinks 9/11 was not a conspiracy, you should be running away with your tails between your legs.
 
"So what does it mean? It means that there is proof... were brought down by

controlled demolition in a planned and purposeful manner by elements of

the Bush Administration"

what?

 
There's convincing evidence for both sides. I haven't done much research about it, and the conspiracy theory cult is long dead. I just find it hard to believe the government would plan to kill a few thousand american citizens so we could go to war.
 
Seriously.

I tend to block out these conspiracy theories. For every good argument, there is an even better one to disprove it. Pearl Harbor, JFK, etc...
 
for all the faults, the Bush administration wouldnt do something like this and to think that JFK, Pearl Harbor, or 9/11 is incredibly ignorant and disrespectful for those that lost their lives in those incidents.
 
All this proves is that it was more planned than just planes running into the towers. The only thing that suggests a conspiracy is how the Bush administration didn't investigate it well, and it took 8 years to scientists to release this report. It's all speculation, no proof of a government conspiracy.
 
wow, would you just give up already? for everything that you crazy dumb asses have regurgitated, theres always a REASONABLE explanation for it. i mean come on already. you already controlled detonated the dead horse. give it a rest and accept that for once, the big bad government wasn't behind something.
 
thats what always gets me about these, there'd be a ton of people involved, and any one of those people would instantly become famous and probably wealthy by outing the whole project to the news
 
i think with the information we have now, it would be borderline ignorant to assume that the US government had nothing to do with 9/11... i think the more likely answer is the one presented by Michael Moore in Farenheit 911 where it states that the Bush administration knew about the attacks coming and did nothing to prevent them in order to profit from the ensuing fear etc.
 
I dont think I have even thought about 911 since the last time I was in the airport.

Conspiracy theories are possible but unlikely I think some "sleeper" Al Quida could have just left some brief cases of thermite in a few good spots.

Finaly I wouldnt put anything past our government at least people in N. Korea know their fucked we walk around thinking Mr President is kissing babies and solving problems.

I wasnt on the whole anti-bush banwagon just becuase he was as equally corrupt as Clinton and Obama isnt going to be any better.

btw- Obama isnt going to do this country any good. -not becuase I want a republican in there becuase the last honest president passed all of the anti-drug laws.
 
the last honest president i would say would probably be abraham lincoln.... over a century and a half ago...
 
Conspiracy Theorists make me laugh. It's taken you 8 years to come up with ANOTHER theory that once again, can probably be disproved in a matter of minutes.
 
why you facepalming me? I DEMAND AN EXPLANATION!!!!

but in reality i couldnt give a damn... im just bored as shit.
 
its interesting to read, and watch those videos, but i cant possibly believe our own government would do that

it'd be discusting
 
why would it be so hard to fathom. our govt for years has had no problem murdering millions in other countires, Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Central America, the list goes on and on, so what is different about the 3000 people who died on 9/11 besides they were american
 
first off:

thermite is aluminum (aircraft hulls) and iron oxide (rust, like rusty metal support beams). It is possible and probable that after crashing a plane into the building and due to the resulting intense heat from the burning of jet fuel, that thermite would be created.

As you heat steel or iron, the oxidation process is sped up a lot, creating iron oxide. This is why inert sheilding gasses are used in MIG and TIG welding to prevent oxygen from reaching the molten metal. As oxidized molten iron reaches aluminum, you get a thermite reaction which in turn increases heat; which causes more thermite to be produced.

next:

optical microscopy = microscope

scanning electron microscopy = another type of microscope

X-ray energy

dispersive spectroscopy = detects chemical composition of samples

differential scanning calorimetry = http://http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Differential_scanning_calorimetry

- NOTHING to do with finding thermite, finds the amount of calories in a sample. EG same thing fat chicks base their diets off

- they can be used to detect oxidation rates, but this data would be useless due fact that all the known components of thermite already existed within the crash site. thermite would have already been a byproduct of the crash.

Biochemical labs do not deal with compositions like thermite, and "nano thermite" is a joke. It is just a fancy way of saying that very fine particles were used. Anyone with highschool chem will know that increasing the surface area of reactants does increase reactivity, but in ths case, not greatly. Also the fact that burning jet fuel was involved would have increased the temperature and reation rate significantly enough to have made up for this difference.

I highly doubt thermite was purposefully used in this senario, and basic tests could prove this point. I can think of many more easily hidden and simpler ways of getting rid of a building.

Using big words does NOT make you right.

I'm not taking sides here and while it may have been a conspiracy, this article is complete bullshit written by someone without a clear grasp of basic chemistry. He should go back to highschool before he makes a fool of himself again.

sorry for the thesis paper.

/rant
 
hahhahaha i loled at that part too. while i do believe the government may have played SOME role, however minor, in the attacks, that conclusion makes ZERO sense
 
exactly, its not easy for people to just blow up a building full of innocent people. you can't be that cynical to think people are that heartless to let that happen.
 
hey buddy good job debunking but i doubt you actually downloaded the full pdf version of the study. Perhaps you should read that and post again. Nice job googling terms. you sure sound like you know what your talking about but in actuality you don't have a clue. Do some real reading next time and maybe you'll make sense.
 
Someone a little bitter they got proven wrong? hmm? you a tad angry you placed your faith in a retarded theory? You bitter someone made you look like a fool?

 


Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe

pp.7-31 (25) Authors: Niels

H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M.

Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, Bradley R.

Larsen

doi: 10.2174/1874412500902010007







Abstract

We

have discovered distinctive red/gray chips in all the samples we have

studied of the dust produced by the destruction of the World Trade

Center. Examination of four of these samples, collected from separate

sites, is reported in this paper. These red/gray chips show marked

similarities in all four samples. One sample was collected by a

Manhattan resident about ten minutes after the collapse of the second

WTC Tower, two the next day, and a fourth about a week later. The

properties of these chips were analyzed using optical microscopy,

scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray energy dispersive

spectroscopy (XEDS), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The

red material contains grains approximately 100 nm across which are

largely iron oxide, while aluminum is contained in tiny plate-like

structures. Separation of components using methyl ethyl ketone

demonstrated that elemental aluminum is present. The iron oxide and

aluminum are intimately mixed in the red material. When ignited in a

DSC device the chips exhibit large but narrow exotherms occurring at

approximately 430 °C, far below the normal ignition temperature for

conventional thermite. Numerous iron-rich spheres are clearly observed

in the residue following the ignition of these peculiar red/gray chips.

The red portion of these chips is found to be an unreacted thermitic

material and highly energetic.

Keywords:

JScanning electron microscopy, X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy,

Differential scanning calorimetry, DSC analysis, World Trade Center,

WTC dust, 9/11, Iron-rich microspheres, Thermite, Super-thermite,

Energetic nanocomposites, Nano-thermite

Affiliation:

Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DK-2100, Denmark.

 


flash_video_placeholder.png

 
Hey guys go to watch movie now site. Then go to end of America it will explain what are goverment is doing. And no it's not a conspiracy movie it's just facts.
 
sometimes i wonder if one day these people are gonna say JUST KIDDING, and explain they are just fucking with us.
 
so for all you people calling this a conspiracy theory here are the people who put on this study

Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Denmark

Department of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA

S&J Scientific Co., Provo, UT, 84606, USA

49/11 Working Group of Bloomington, Bloomington, IN 47401, USA

Logical Systems Consulting, Perth, Western Australia

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Berkeley, CA 94704, USA

International Center for 9/11 Studies, Dallas, TX 75231, USA

Sounds like a bunch of crazies huh?!
 
How do you explain how all 3 buildings fell straight down on themselves at maximum velocity, even building seven which no plane ever touched. Also the buildings had steel cores in the center to hold them up, melting steel doesnt fall down, it twists and bends which would cause a slow, twisting fall.
 
no, they are probably really smart. the idea that they are trying to support is fucking insane.... and im standing by this cause i have a friend in navy intelligence, and knew a couple of people that died in the 9/11.... so dont go starting to spout this garbage... its disrespectful to those who died in the attacks. my 8th grade class went to ground zero shortly after it happened to lay a wreth down for the friend of ours that died... the place is eerie, and its a very sad place to be. now you are just being an ignorant ass for not willing to try and look at both sides. ive read that little thermite article, and ive handled it... the stuff is strong and yes, can burn through metal... but in seriousness.... even if the government was going to do something, they would use explosive charges not some crazy backyard chemistry experiment material.
 
Benditto the problem people are having is not with the validity of the paper, it is with your logic. The fact that thermite was present at the WTC site is not a smoking gun of American involvement. It is just as (if not more) logical to say that the thermite was from demolition men cutting up scrap steel girders in the rubble. Benditto this is a serious question.

Do you believe that George Bush is the unprecedented and peerless operational and military genius needed to perpetrate the most elaborate hoax of all time?

 
By the way, papers on Bentham are usually reliable. They are subject to the same problems of any other open journal. You never know when the paper you just read, or the experiment you are trying to replicate was written by the next Pons and Fleischmann.
 
Back
Top