fukeneh Active member Jan 29, 2006 #1 i loved how tanner r just didnt care at ALL, it was a burly cork 3
LOLO_FAVRE Member Jan 29, 2006 #2 if tanner did a 3 it's cose right after his first jump at the top of the big air he cough and his shoulder popped of so he wasn't that to jump
if tanner did a 3 it's cose right after his first jump at the top of the big air he cough and his shoulder popped of so he wasn't that to jump
LOLO_FAVRE Member Jan 29, 2006 #4 tanner popped of his shoulder before his 2nd run. that's may be why he did a cork 3
ry.will Active member Jan 29, 2006 #5 jacob westers switch 7 crazy grab was the best thing i saw, even though he fell.
M marik Member Jan 29, 2006 #6 wasnt it the healpeice that like snapped apart on the inpact? thats wat it looked like to me
sexy_skier_babii Active member Jan 29, 2006 #10 the only reason why he fell is because when he landed his binding fell off, but if he would have sticked that, man oh man!
the only reason why he fell is because when he landed his binding fell off, but if he would have sticked that, man oh man!
chowe6 Member Jan 29, 2006 #12 it was sick to see him try and if he suck it it would have been the trick of the x-games....snowboarding aint got shit on that
it was sick to see him try and if he suck it it would have been the trick of the x-games....snowboarding aint got shit on that
V vtrider Active member Jan 29, 2006 #13 bushy was running the fks bindings set at 16, the force of a double switch back just has the effect of popping shit out, dumbass.
bushy was running the fks bindings set at 16, the force of a double switch back just has the effect of popping shit out, dumbass.
millhouseskis Member Jan 29, 2006 #14 i was quite satisfied when he commented on how EVERYONE was doing 10's.
rocMALONEYphotos Active member Jan 29, 2006 #15 dude i agree, i thought it was dope how he jus did a 3, i give him props
Vicious Active member Jan 29, 2006 #16 Switch double back = waaaaaay cooler than all the other hucked switch 10s. That is all.
ajax Active member Jan 29, 2006 #17 definitely, it sucks that his bindings released though, major props to him for doing something different
definitely, it sucks that his bindings released though, major props to him for doing something different
Ski_Unit_19 Active member Staff member Jan 29, 2006 #20 yeah man thanks for making that comp worth watching
LDuggan420 Active member Jan 29, 2006 #21 what the hell i didnt see this was it in the middle of the Skier cross
M MALONE Active member Jan 29, 2006 #22 bushfeild trying switch double backs is over played, its all about rainilles cork 3's
G GotamaBCshredder Active member Jan 29, 2006 #23 yeah rainvilles was cool to, but the switch back and switch double back were both sick, the LCP boys are so bad ass
yeah rainvilles was cool to, but the switch back and switch double back were both sick, the LCP boys are so bad ass
A attitashfreestyle29 Active member Jan 29, 2006 #24 it was after skiercross and do you guys think rory would've won if he had landed it i bet the judges would be bitches and not let him win
it was after skiercross and do you guys think rory would've won if he had landed it i bet the judges would be bitches and not let him win
ThaLorax Active member Jan 29, 2006 #25 if rory landed that he deffinitely should've won but of other than that schiller deffinitely deserved that win. his was the least hucked looking of all.
if rory landed that he deffinitely should've won but of other than that schiller deffinitely deserved that win. his was the least hucked looking of all.
nothanks Active member Jan 29, 2006 #28 Good stunt to just do what you said, throw something else besides a damn cork 10....Laurent....nice 7....TJ's 10 was the only one I liked.... Sammy, I wanted the 12, It's okay, I still love you.
Good stunt to just do what you said, throw something else besides a damn cork 10....Laurent....nice 7....TJ's 10 was the only one I liked.... Sammy, I wanted the 12, It's okay, I still love you.
pommery Member Jan 29, 2006 #29 did anyone notice that the two people who popped out had rossi bindings? hmm.