ok fuck, searchbar harder. Even the kids on here can figure that shit out.
dumonts, sick ski... poppy, great profile for anywhere on the hill. (clearly not anything deeper than the knees. I assume since youve been park skiing hahaha for 12 years you remember when a fat ski was like 78 at the waist and can ski properly) theyre pretty bomber, they are great for jibbing because they are light, they have edge re-enforcement all around. Dull your edges before jibbing... or get cracked edges. Thats how it works. Clearly the ski works great in the pipe, and on jumps... its all you ever see Simon doing on this very ski. Even though he slays everywhere, neet kid. fast bases, neet graphics, and unless you are one of those people who do wierd things to skis, youre not going to pop out any of the cap. Oh and wood core... so there you go.
T-halls, sicker... (in my opinion.)
Theyre fine on jumps, stiff enough underfoot to be stable and fine. The carbon stringers tip to tail and neeto fiberglass keep the tip and tails torsionally rigid, but allow for sweet buttering... and still tons of pop. sidewalls, simple graphic, speedy tough base, its a ski designed by the best skier in the world, how could you go wrong right? its not just good for rails either champ. I have ridden the 81 and its 82 underfoot i believe and thats fine to ride anywhere on the hill yet again. NOw I know someone is just gonna say if it snows you cant ride them cause theyre too narrow... learn how to ski is my only reply to that. (haha or watch hot dog and see how they did it back when hop turns and ballet were the hotness)
I say t halls, for your "park skiing"
whos the asshole now?