Sad... you hear Jon just after practice, describing what it takes at X? At NO point did he mention 'style'... the word didn't even come up. And for good reason; if they cared about style, he'd win every god damn time. But nobody watching the X-games has a fucking clue what to look for style wise, they just want to see the little guy go really high up in the air. I mean... shit, 20 feet out is great, but it doesn't automatically guarantee you a win, certainly not against the sheer flow of Jon or that stomped 1080 in Tanner's last run. I think they're just tired of giving the same guy the medals, I really do. And Jon... well, it wouldn't be the X-games if jon didn't get robbed. Dumont's first run was an 85, second was maybe an 89-90... Tanner's runs were 90 and 92, and Jon should've had an 87 first run, and I don't know... I'll have to watch the 2nd one again, but looked to me like the winner right there, or 2nd place to the stomped 10, at the very least.
Can I judge the X-games now? Please?
5*****~~~~~~~~~~
F*****~~~~~~~~~~
R*****~~~~~~~~~~
N~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
T~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Current Reigning NS Moron: 'how comes all female tennis players have last names that end in 'ova''
-Snapjibber2008, Member # 12044