Substantial Triple Strum Sale, Cheap prices. Pants, Jackets, Seths, Jesters, urbans

Triple_Strum

Triple_Strum

Active member
I'm back with more stuff. Help me get rid of it. prices are cheap and ready to move this stuff! Trades not accepted unless it is highly beneficial for me. Looking for Line Prophet 90/100 or Bridges. Anyway, Money Orders preferred on the higher price items, or asking for a little help with PayPal fees if you pay via PayPal. I am pretty reasonable to work with though, ask anyone on here. So, here we go.

1. Giro G10 - pearl white, medium. Used 4 days, no bails, immaculate condition. One sticker on the back that says 242 Cantrell, but of course that is removable. Asking $50 plus about $8 shipped in the U.S. or $11 to Canada.

1206207319IMG_0976.jpg


2. Oakley In-Focus. XL, ozone. Used half a day, still has tags. Bought these from Cbrady as an impulse buy, selling as break even price. $100 plus $10 shipped in the U.S. or $14 to Canada.

1206207239IMG_0974.jpg


1206207270IMG_0975.jpg


3. Oakley Inclination Jacket. Large, black, brand new with tags. Selling cheaper than it was on steep and cheap! $79 plus $12 for shipping in the U.S., $15 to Canada

1206207361IMG_0979.JPG


4. Fate Jacket. XL, but fits like a baggy large. Limeish, super sick. Got it here from a great seller, worn it a few times, but it is getting warmer out and want the money for other things. $65 plus $10 shipping in the U.S. and $14 to Canada

1206207481Fate_Jacket.jpg


5. Urban T-Halls. 176. One ski with a smal edge crack, the other with a 2-3 section missing as seen in the picture. plenty of topsheet chipping from a couple years of use. $55 now plus $15 shipped in the U.S. $22 to Canada.

1202503274IMG_0553.jpg


1202503343IMG_0559.jpg


6. 174 Scratch FS. Some topsheet chipping and deep scratches in the base, but edges in good shape. You could use these as a primary ski with some p-tex work and a solid tune. $65 plus same shipping as stated for Thalls.

1205708858IMG_0805.jpg


7. Orage Ion Pants. Womens XXL, but fit like a mens medium/large (see picture on me, 5'10" 195 lbs). Brand new, insulated, 20K waterproofing, $260 retail. Just want to get rid of them. $45 plus $10 shipping in the U.S. and $14 to Canada

1203636419IMG_0743.jpg


1203636445IMG_0748.jpg


8. Lastly, some '08 Seth Vicious in 179 with Marker Jesters. This ski has only been used 3 days and is in nearly perfectly condition, with only a couple of tiny chips on the tips, as shown. These are on their second mount, as they were mounted on the traditional powder mount, then moved to a more all-mountain mount (see pics for current mounting position). So, the skis are $629 new and the bindings $300 and hard to find, I am looking to get $540 for skis and bindings, or I would like $350 for the skis and $220 for the bindings.

1206208274IMG_0980.jpg


1206208318IMG_0981.jpg


1206208368IMG_0982.JPG


1206208463IMG_0983.jpg


1206208491IMG_0984.jpg


1206208520IMG_0985.jpg
 
it says hes 5'10" and 195 but im 140 and the jester are sick binding ive never pre released from them and only released when they ahoud have you shuld buy them
 
The jesters are so light yet so consistent. I think there is a reason you cannot find them on sale anywhere, they are just plain sick.
 
jester are lighter cause not all metal, but they are sick biinders tehy have a wide footprint made for freeride skis
 
Yep, I've ridden p12s, axial 140s, z12, s914, s912, FKS 120 and 155. These are the best. They are a great combination of a z12 lightweight set up with axial 140 toughness it seems.
 
legit price on jesters, the place i had lined up to buy from sold out but i am unalbe to use paypal/money order, so bump for dope binders
 
I've heard they are only good for lightweight to medium-weight people. Bigger guys tend to break Marker bindings because of the plastic.
 
That could be true, but I still have only met or talked to one person who has broken them. So far they have a pretty good track record. I don't think Marker would make a bindings with a Din to 16 if people who needed that Din couldn't use them.
 
I'm 190 and 6' 3" and I've got the same seth/ jester setup. they've held up fine, and only popped

off when they were supposed to. the jesters work great for big dudes.
 
well i bought them off sac and i think i still have the tags but i wore them a half day... they wont still take them wil they?
 
^ sorry about that. I just went through the PM log and there it was. I must have clicked on it accidentally. Anyway, I responded.
 
uhhhh, just to add about the jesters..... i'm 6ft 220lbs........... they still look new except for the paint slightly chipping off the heel end of the binding which is from my opposite ski hitting it. Seriously...... don't think these things are gonna break, and a 16 din is not for the light hearted mine are set at 8.5. Never pre release and only ejected out of these things twice. Absolutely insane binding will probably only ride this binding for the rest of my life
 
If any one is dumb enough to think this guy is not legit they should be taken out and shot. made two transactions with him in the past, he was great to work with both times.
 
my skis for the black oakley jacket and baby blue oakley pants... i got fischer addicts 172 with rossi pivots... check out my threads
 
^ someone offered me money on the skis the bindings together, but if that falls through we'll talk, and I am not that interested in a trade for skis. Thanks anyway though.
 
jacket has 100 g insulation. Not a down jacket, but I wore a nearly identical jacket with a t-shirt at -5 this winter. Both would fit perfectly, but price is definitely not negotiable. I mean bro, the jacket and pants retails at $275 and $220 ($495) and are selling for under $200, that is ridiculous. I sort of can't believe you asked.
 
^ I do still have the pants. They are regular or mountain fit, so not super baggy compared to other XLs. I would say they fit like a bigger large or smaller XL compared to some other brands. I am 5'10" and 190 lbs and they fit me great, not too baggy, but not gaper or old man style either. (obviously since oakley wouldn't make them like that :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top