Stock market

14234951:SuspiciousFish said:
Especially considering she was literally the high priestess of the Economy at the Federal Reserve.
Click to expand...

Yeah but she's the first woman treasury secretary so it all cancels out. If you say otherwise or question any of this, you're probably a white supremacist, nazi, russian trumper plotting a global insurrection against jewish hedge fund managers or something.
 
14234965:T.L. said:
Yeah but she's the first woman treasury secretary so it all cancels out. If you say otherwise or question any of this, you're probably a white supremacist, nazi, russian trumper plotting a global insurrection against jewish hedge fund managers or something.
Click to expand...

Im sorry I cant hear you over the

HOLY SHIT 320 and CLIMBING!!!!

I wonder what is going to happen when the Vampires actually have to show their fangs?
 
14234965:T.L. said:
Yeah but she's the first woman treasury secretary so it all cancels out. If you say otherwise or question any of this, you're probably a white supremacist, nazi, russian trumper plotting a global insurrection against jewish hedge fund managers or something.
Click to expand...

curious, i searched for that first one, the cnn business one, and could not find anything. i think that's fake and you got duped. i didn't check the others but yeah
 
14234969:SofaKingSick said:
curious, i searched for that first one, the cnn business one, and could not find anything. i think that's fake and you got duped. i didn't check the others but yeah
Click to expand...

that's the meme dude... of course its fake.

The narrative that they're seeding is that this whole situation is being caused by white supremacist nazi trump supporters from reddit. The rest are real. I've been archiving all this shit as its happening.
 
14234971:T.L. said:
that's the meme dude... of course its fake.

The narrative that they're seeding is that this whole situation is being caused by white supremacist nazi trump supporters from reddit. The rest are real. I've been archiving all this shit as its happening.
Click to expand...

but the only one from an actual news source making a claim is the fake one, which you didn't distinguish from the others

and the others aren't what you present them to be. the last one appears to be about how one of the same reasons trump got support was the "common man vs the elites" struggle, and how that same struggle is playing out here

the ali breland one i found, and you omitted the follow-up tweet: "please do not interpret this as me saying that the gme, and r/wallstreetbet pumps are nazi endeavors, in the same way that nazis gloming onto vaporware does not make all vaporwave racist"

the bloomberg one uses the word insurrection, yes, but the definition of an insurrection is an uprising against authorities

so that plus your fake one/meme, and the fact that i've not seen one legit news source try to portray the gamestop WSB folks as being white supremacists/nazis... i think it's you who is trying to tell a story that isn't really there. i'm sure there are some wackos out there claiming similar but that's not your claim, your claim is that the Big Guys are doing that and i've not seen any evidence of that
 
u New money kids r jokes. I’m laughing doing a little happy dance that u kids think ur ballers. Broke ass new money

**This post was edited on Jan 29th 2021 at 4:06:59pm
 
14234979:SofaKingSick said:
but the only one from an actual news source making a claim is the fake one, which you didn't distinguish from the others

and the others aren't what you present them to be. the last one appears to be about how one of the same reasons trump got support was the "common man vs the elites" struggle, and how that same struggle is playing out here

the ali breland one i found, and you omitted the follow-up tweet: "please do not interpret this as me saying that the gme, and r/wallstreetbet pumps are nazi endeavors, in the same way that nazis gloming onto vaporware does not make all vaporwave racist"

the bloomberg one uses the word insurrection, yes, but the definition of an insurrection is an uprising against authorities

so that plus your fake one/meme, and the fact that i've not seen one legit news source try to portray the gamestop WSB folks as being white supremacists/nazis... i think it's you who is trying to tell a story that isn't really there. i'm sure there are some wackos out there claiming similar but that's not your claim, your claim is that the Big Guys are doing that and i've not seen any evidence of that
Click to expand...

The problem is the language designed to polarize news consumers. The establishment media's tactical use of language to gaslight people into having a certain reaction is totally out of control. One side gets angry because the journalists and publications are insinuating that they're the scum of the earth and the other side laps it up because they've been conditioned to think they're warriors in a battle to save the world from an imaginary global threat of racists and evil extremists hiding around every corner.

It doesn't matter what the topic is anymore, if you're counter to the orthodoxy, you're a racist or a white supremacist. They're free to say and call people what they want but I'm pointing out that it's disingenuous and their motives for doing so are suspicious.

All I'm saying is that people have taken notice that the seeds are being sewn right now to plant a narrative that has been successfully used in the past to shut down information that's deemed undesirable by the people who wield the power.

- Discord banned the WSB group for "hate speech" and then brought them back because it was all bullshit.

- The OG owner of WSB decided to larp as a janitor when the sub grew beyond his control and now he's telling the WSJ that it has a vast history of problematic behavior.

"Then there was the hate speech. Last year, Mr. Rogozinski decided to do some housekeeping and scrub some of the more distasteful content being shared in the community. In an off-Reddit chat room associated with WallStreetBets, he found language rife with obscenity, racism and antigay views that moderators let stand.

“There were a handful of mods who were straight up white supremacists,” he said. As a Jewish man married to a Mexican woman, he found it impossible to stomach.

“I have really thick skin and people can say whatever they want to me, but at some point there’s a moral standpoint—like with my kids, I don’t want them to think, ‘Well, they can say whatever they want about you,’” he said."
https://www.wsj.com/articles/wallst...emes-loss-porn-and-online-threats-11611829800

- Newsweek is suggesting that this is radicalizing people.
https://www.newsweek.com/far-right-extremists-use-gamestop-chaos-radicalize-recruit-telegram-1565355

- Teen vogue tries their hardest to insinuate that WSB people are guilty by association.

https://www.teenvogue.com/story/reddit-gamestop-stock-frenzy-challenge-wall-street-capitalism

"Reddit is used by tends of millions of people, and it would be irresponsible to assert that they are all edgelords or organized white supremacists." .. but we're going to say it anyway.

-https://www.inputmag.com/culture/your-rwallstreetbets-heroes-are-racist-so-discord-banned-the-server
 
14235001:T.L. said:
The problem is the language designed to polarize news consumers. The establishment media's tactical use of language to gaslight people into having a certain reaction is totally out of control. One side gets angry because the journalists and publications are insinuating that they're the scum of the earth and the other side laps it up because they've been conditioned to think they're warriors in a battle to save the world from an imaginary global threat of racists and evil extremists hiding around every corner.

It doesn't matter what the topic is anymore, if you're counter to the orthodoxy, you're a racist or a white supremacist. They're free to say and call people what they want but I'm pointing out that it's disingenuous and their motives for doing so are suspicious.

All I'm saying is that people have taken notice that the seeds are being sewn right now to plant a narrative that has been successfully used in the past to shut down information that's deemed undesirable by the people who wield the power.

- Discord banned the WSB group for "hate speech" and then brought them back because it was all bullshit.

- The OG owner of WSB decided to larp as a janitor when the sub grew beyond his control and now he's telling the WSJ that it has a vast history of problematic behavior.

"Then there was the hate speech. Last year, Mr. Rogozinski decided to do some housekeeping and scrub some of the more distasteful content being shared in the community. In an off-Reddit chat room associated with WallStreetBets, he found language rife with obscenity, racism and antigay views that moderators let stand.

“There were a handful of mods who were straight up white supremacists,” he said. As a Jewish man married to a Mexican woman, he found it impossible to stomach.

“I have really thick skin and people can say whatever they want to me, but at some point there’s a moral standpoint—like with my kids, I don’t want them to think, ‘Well, they can say whatever they want about you,’” he said."
https://www.wsj.com/articles/wallst...emes-loss-porn-and-online-threats-11611829800

- Newsweek is suggesting that this is radicalizing people.
https://www.newsweek.com/far-right-extremists-use-gamestop-chaos-radicalize-recruit-telegram-1565355

- Teen vogue tries their hardest to insinuate that WSB people are guilty by association.

https://www.teenvogue.com/story/reddit-gamestop-stock-frenzy-challenge-wall-street-capitalism

"Reddit is used by tends of millions of people, and it would be irresponsible to assert that they are all edgelords or organized white supremacists." .. but we're going to say it anyway.

-https://www.inputmag.com/culture/your-rwallstreetbets-heroes-are-racist-so-discord-banned-the-server
Click to expand...

The funny thing is nomatter how hard they try to spin this, America hates Wall Street. We never forgot how we were swindled and jerked us around in 2008 and how the big investment houses sold us out and got bailed out for it. Now, they got too greedy and we called their bluff and fucked em. That and it draws a line in the sand for Biden and the Democrats. Do they support their wealthy donors or cater to the progressives who think this is the amazing fruition of the dream of Occupy Wall Street?

I mean, for a short moment Ted Cruz and AOC were on the same frequency. Elizabeth Warren basically committed suicide going against them and reaffirmed she was a shit candidate against Bernie. This is going to get ugly fast and whatever side anyone in the government picks will dictate how their career ends up. If Trump was still on office it would be easy to pin him as a Wall Street stooge but Bidens in the big seat now and its going to be on him and his administration. Including Janet Yellen who got $800,000 from Citadel.

The brass balled bros out on WSB held the line today and they are running out of options to cover up the Short Squeeze catastrophe coming down the line. I have my popcorn ready because its going to be a hell of a ride and normal Americans on both sides of the aisle want blood from 2008.
 
14235001:T.L. said:
The problem is the language designed to polarize news consumers. The establishment media's tactical use of language to gaslight people into having a certain reaction is totally out of control. One side gets angry because the journalists and publications are insinuating that they're the scum of the earth and the other side laps it up because they've been conditioned to think they're warriors in a battle to save the world from an imaginary global threat of racists and evil extremists hiding around every corner.

It doesn't matter what the topic is anymore, if you're counter to the orthodoxy, you're a racist or a white supremacist. They're free to say and call people what they want but I'm pointing out that it's disingenuous and their motives for doing so are suspicious.

All I'm saying is that people have taken notice that the seeds are being sewn right now to plant a narrative that has been successfully used in the past to shut down information that's deemed undesirable by the people who wield the power.

- Discord banned the WSB group for "hate speech" and then brought them back because it was all bullshit.

- The OG owner of WSB decided to larp as a janitor when the sub grew beyond his control and now he's telling the WSJ that it has a vast history of problematic behavior.

"Then there was the hate speech. Last year, Mr. Rogozinski decided to do some housekeeping and scrub some of the more distasteful content being shared in the community. In an off-Reddit chat room associated with WallStreetBets, he found language rife with obscenity, racism and antigay views that moderators let stand.

“There were a handful of mods who were straight up white supremacists,” he said. As a Jewish man married to a Mexican woman, he found it impossible to stomach.

“I have really thick skin and people can say whatever they want to me, but at some point there’s a moral standpoint—like with my kids, I don’t want them to think, ‘Well, they can say whatever they want about you,’” he said."
https://www.wsj.com/articles/wallst...emes-loss-porn-and-online-threats-11611829800

- Newsweek is suggesting that this is radicalizing people.
https://www.newsweek.com/far-right-extremists-use-gamestop-chaos-radicalize-recruit-telegram-1565355

- Teen vogue tries their hardest to insinuate that WSB people are guilty by association.

https://www.teenvogue.com/story/reddit-gamestop-stock-frenzy-challenge-wall-street-capitalism

"Reddit is used by tends of millions of people, and it would be irresponsible to assert that they are all edgelords or organized white supremacists." .. but we're going to say it anyway.

-https://www.inputmag.com/culture/your-rwallstreetbets-heroes-are-racist-so-discord-banned-the-server
Click to expand...

You're trying to paint a certain picture but your sources are really weak. The fake post you led with, the weak real ones that followed and I picked apart, now Newsweek (trash), wsj (100% not on the little guys' side lmao), teen vogue (really?)... you're trying to mix the (definitely real) surge in white supremacy etc lately with anyone who opposes you on another subject and it's just not an accurate representation hence the weak examples

while we're on the subject, I'm not telling you the WSB folks are Nazis but they aren't your friends either. They aren't on WSB to improve the world, they're there to meme and try to be Jordan Belfort. They have a very legitimate grievance here and have people from all over the spectrum on their side on this but you'd be a fool to take their output at face value. (And internetty groups like them DO often get co-opted by nefarious groups because they're such a magnet for impressionable people.)

You're drawing battle lines here that don't need to be there... hell this episode put ted Cruz and AOC on the same page for a tenth of a second.

So it seems really disingenuous and actually a little curious that you'd paint the lines there yourself, "on this side are me, WSB, and folks getting shouted down for racist ideologies, and on the other side are my opponents"
 
14235051:SofaKingSick said:
You're trying to paint a certain picture but your sources are really weak. The fake post you led with, the weak real ones that followed and I picked apart, now Newsweek (trash), wsj (100% not on the little guys' side lmao), teen vogue (really?)... you're trying to mix the (definitely real) surge in white supremacy etc lately with anyone who opposes you on another subject and it's just not an accurate representation hence the weak examples

while we're on the subject, I'm not telling you the WSB folks are Nazis but they aren't your friends either. They aren't on WSB to improve the world, they're there to meme and try to be Jordan Belfort. They have a very legitimate grievance here and have people from all over the spectrum on their side on this but you'd be a fool to take their output at face value. (And internetty groups like them DO often get co-opted by nefarious groups because they're such a magnet for impressionable people.)

You're drawing battle lines here that don't need to be there... hell this episode put ted Cruz and AOC on the same page for a tenth of a second.

So it seems really disingenuous and actually a little curious that you'd paint the lines there yourself, "on this side are me, WSB, and folks getting shouted down for racist ideologies, and on the other side are my opponents"
Click to expand...

The only picture I'm painting is that a narrative is being constructed by various elements of press. Some mainstream, some not so mainstream, and within certain circles online. That's about it. It's been gaining a fair amount of traction on twitter and some boards I glance at a few times per day. I made an objectively funny joke, posted a meme related to said joke, and a handful of real people saying real, ridiculous things. I posted some articles that have been published talking about the narrative that's being constructed because you said you couldn't find anything and here we are. Anything other than what I just said and you're filling in blanks.
 
14235054:T.L. said:
The only picture I'm painting is that a narrative is being constructed by various elements of press. Some mainstream, some not so mainstream, and within certain circles online. That's about it. It's been gaining a fair amount of traction on twitter and some boards I glance at a few times per day. I made an objectively funny joke, posted a meme related to said joke, and a handful of real people saying real, ridiculous things. I posted some articles that have been published talking about the narrative that's being constructed because you said you couldn't find anything and here we are. Anything other than what I just said and you're filling in blanks.
Click to expand...

Yeah yeah, you're joking but you're also not joking, I know. google that picture (the first one that I called out as fake, and you said is a joke), and see how often you're seeing it posted in seriousness vs as an "objectively funny joke." Hmm
 
14235010:SuspiciousFish said:
The funny thing is nomatter how hard they try to spin this, America hates Wall Street. We never forgot how we were swindled and jerked us around in 2008 and how the big investment houses sold us out and got bailed out for it. Now, they got too greedy and we called their bluff and fucked em. That and it draws a line in the sand for Biden and the Democrats. Do they support their wealthy donors or cater to the progressives who think this is the amazing fruition of the dream of Occupy Wall Street?

I mean, for a short moment Ted Cruz and AOC were on the same frequency. Elizabeth Warren basically committed suicide going against them and reaffirmed she was a shit candidate against Bernie. This is going to get ugly fast and whatever side anyone in the government picks will dictate how their career ends up. If Trump was still on office it would be easy to pin him as a Wall Street stooge but Bidens in the big seat now and its going to be on him and his administration. Including Janet Yellen who got $800,000 from Citadel.

The brass balled bros out on WSB held the line today and they are running out of options to cover up the Short Squeeze catastrophe coming down the line. I have my popcorn ready because its going to be a hell of a ride and normal Americans on both sides of the aisle want blood from 2008.
Click to expand...

The 2008 crash was hella fucked up in the crib and that's the main reason I'm behind what's happening now.
 
14235066:spruitm said:
Geez, this thread blew up. Still holding ????
Click to expand...

14235085:SuspiciousFish said:
Its crazy how much politics get injected into these kind of things.

Whats wrong with just liking the stock?
Click to expand...

Yeah I didn’t come here for political commentary. I’m just trying to hold the line.
 
The only thing I'm going to say politically in here is that Elizabeth Warren on CNBC on Thursday had a lot of words come out of her mouth, and yet she didn't say anything.

Then her dumb inquiry to the SEC seems to want to crack down on hedge funds AND retail investors.

Just let me trade.

WE LIKE THE STOCK?
 
14235202:JAHpow said:
The only thing I'm going to say politically in here is that Elizabeth Warren on CNBC on Thursday had a lot of words come out of her mouth, and yet she didn't say anything.

Then her dumb inquiry to the SEC seems to want to crack down on hedge funds AND retail investors.

Just let me trade.

WE LIKE THE STOCK?
Click to expand...

She also likes to fly on private jets to events where she talks about climate change.

WE LIKE THE STOCK
 
Oh my god what in the fuck happened I just got back from a week long no cell phone excursion and come back to this!!??

Who took home some coin from the nuclear meltdown I am legit tripping I missed this.
 
14235267:soup said:
Oh my god what in the fuck happened I just got back from a week long no cell phone excursion and come back to this!!??

Who took home some coin from the nuclear meltdown I am legit tripping I missed this.
Click to expand...

do not worry my friend

the squeeze has not yet been squoze
 
Here is a beautiful video of pre 2008 Jim Cramer, when he thought he was a untouchable hedge fund bro. Really worth a watch. He talks about how hedge funds manipulate the market in their favor.


Funny how post 2008 when he went bust he whored himself out to CNBC money.
 
Question-

Right now my account with Robinhood requires that I follow the PDT rule. I'm closing my Robinhood account after all this craziness and am moving to my TD Ameritrade account, which also, as of right now, follows the PDT rule.

Can I make three trades on Robinhood AND three trades on TD within the span of a week and still avoid getting labeled as a PDT?
 
14235549:JAHpow said:
Question-

Right now my account with Robinhood requires that I follow the PDT rule. I'm closing my Robinhood account after all this craziness and am moving to my TD Ameritrade account, which also, as of right now, follows the PDT rule.

Can I make three trades on Robinhood AND three trades on TD within the span of a week and still avoid getting labeled as a PDT?
Click to expand...

Don’t quote me but I believe so. The rule applies to each broker so in theory you could max out one and move to the next and so on.
 
14235549:JAHpow said:
Question-

Right now my account with Robinhood requires that I follow the PDT rule. I'm closing my Robinhood account after all this craziness and am moving to my TD Ameritrade account, which also, as of right now, follows the PDT rule.

Can I make three trades on Robinhood AND three trades on TD within the span of a week and still avoid getting labeled as a PDT?
Click to expand...

The PDT restrictions do get removed when you have $25k+ in your account FYI.
 
14235594:Charlie_Kelly said:
Don’t quote me but I believe so. The rule applies to each broker so in theory you could max out one and move to the next and so on.
Click to expand...

Ok, that's what I was thinking.

14235708:1337 said:
The PDT restrictions do get removed when you have $25k+ in your account FYI.
Click to expand...

Yup, that's the next step.

Thanks dudes!
 
14235720:JAHpow said:
Ok, that's what I was thinking.

Yup, that's the next step.

Thanks dudes!
Click to expand...

If only RH removed the limits on $GME and $AMC, I could start PDT them.
 
14235873:Charlie_Kelly said:
Wrong side of history.

In other news, RH’s rating on the App Store has fallen from 4.8 to 4.1. Hoping to see it in the 3’s by EOW.
Click to expand...

It's 1.1 on Google play. I revised my current rating to 1 star. They already fucked me my having multiple outages this summer but this is the last straw. Transferring to TD when I get a chance. I like RH for ease of use but TD has so much more stuff and they don't take forever for tax documents.
 
14235873:Charlie_Kelly said:
Wrong side of history.

In other news, RH’s rating on the App Store has fallen from 4.8 to 4.1. Hoping to see it in the 3’s by EOW.
Click to expand...

These people have no idea how the internet or memes work. This is only going to throw gas on the fire and give more attention and comical sayings. As soon as the movement smells the desperation they are going to double down again and again.

CbXFxErUsAA23Zx.png
 
Here's kimmel saying that it's "russian disrupters" buying game stop. Kimmel didn't write that line and his writers didn't write that line.. Who did and why would someone inject this narrative? It's absolutely absurd.
https://twitter.com/shoe0nhead/status/1355977811081748480

inb4 muh 17 intelligence agencies say "its the russians definitely for sure please believe us this time."
 
So Robinhood says they're restricting buys to one share. But that's only if you DON'T ALREADY OWN A SHARE. wtaf
 
14236543:JAHpow said:
So Robinhood says they're restricting buys to one share. But that's only if you DON'T ALREADY OWN A SHARE. wtaf
Click to expand...

Oh I see this was already addressed earlier on this page haha
 
14236128:T.L. said:
Here's kimmel saying that it's "russian disrupters" buying game stop. Kimmel didn't write that line and his writers didn't write that line.. Who did and why would someone inject this narrative? It's absolutely absurd.
https://twitter.com/shoe0nhead/status/1355977811081748480

inb4 muh 17 intelligence agencies say "its the russians definitely for sure please believe us this time."
Click to expand...

Nah man, now they are legit concerned that you are going to cut yourself...


[URL]https://twitter.com/ndrew_lawrence/status/1356253787011371008[/url]

Holy fuck these people are desperate.
 
14236792:Charlie_Kelly said:
Price falls $100 in a day with 25% the average volume. Hmmmm ?
Click to expand...

Do you think the low volume is still because robinhood (and I think some other brokerages) are still suspending buying?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top