Steezy 1620 [ . ] [ . ] robot boobs

obviously as has been said already, a slow corked 5 or 7 with a really 'held' grab would have been steezier.. but that said, for a 1620 that was pretty damn smooth
 
That is so true!! Why don't we give credit to the acrobatic skiers who throw 3 to 4 backflip with a 720 or 1080...

Cause it's no way steezy.

For me, the style is a way more important than the number of spins or flips!
 
i think im the first one to say this and i dont care if i get flamed, but i enjoy seeing that just as much as a steezy sw cork 5.
 
ok lets think about this that was a 1620

1620/360= 4.5

so all you can talk about your crazy 3 grabs but the fact is that was 4 and a half times what a 360 is which is indeed fucking insane
 
that was sick, grabs are overrated anyway, wide and low stance, staggered skis, dope ass 1620 in my book. Obviously everyone has a different opinion on what styles look good. You might think twinkle toes on the baby park box is steezy, or the guy with his arms straight down like he's trying to reach his boots standing up looks good.
 
i actually liked this one better. you would think someone would huck one on the JOI jump....
 
sorry, thats a little too much for me.

IMO, a laid out cork 5, 7, or 9 would be much harder than a 1620 off of that jump.

it would look better too.
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6dOySGMGjAI&feature=related

No meng this is oozing steeze right here! ^ {/sarc}
 
i dont wanna say it was styly

but compare it to the silverstar 1800 or whatever, makes this one look steezy.
 
and this quickly turned into a style over technicality thread, yet again, haters on spin to win, its nuts k, lets see u land a 1620, thats a lot of fucking spinning
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top