SPATULAS

^ whoaa. gross. and my post was directed towards CalSkierX. he just posts whack stuff... even in the Regional Boards.
 
there is some talk that Project Vulcan will be more geared towards a more versatile ski. So....not as good in powder. So, some people aren't sure how sick it will actually be. I don't know why they would try and make it more versatile. It is such a niche ski..why fuck with it. And if your looking for a ultra fat there are better options as far as versatility goes - tabla rosa, FFF, trasher, etc.
 
More like a 150-130-110 kind of a thing. Though that's by no means an accurate measure of dimensions, don't quote me on that.
 
i got my s916 race stock bindings for $225. i dunno why you pulled the number $466 outta your ass- totally off the mark. and, NO, i didn't get them on pro-form.
 
i hope your talking to the other guy, not me. I'm not stupid enough to come up with a random number like $466.......
 
First of all my penis is so big i need to hallow out a red nurfball to keep the neighbors from loosing their eyes. second.. Its the internet calm down .. third my interview is balla.. And fourth i was curious to what bindings cost over 400 and who the fuck actually spends over 400 on bindings. My girlfriend just yelled at my nipple,. thanks,, Nick.
 
I was NOT yelling at your nipple, but maybe you were too delirious with pleasure to nitice that, bitch.

Alisa (yes, i am a real person, 707 761 9464)
 
I was thinking about that today, it's truer to a waterski shape, which I think is the idea. Slalom skis get really narrow in the tail compared to the waist and nose. Though waterskis still have reverse sidecut, and i think that's what makes the spatula so manuverable. 150-130-110 doesn't seem like it would slide as well, i'd think the tail would be deeper down.
 
Oh, i've also though why not make a snowboard with reverse sidecut and decamber? All surfboards are. If someone makes that, I might start snowboarding.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top