i thought the guy had some good points, er, was good at pointing out the obvious. that michael moore quote doesnt need to be attached to any sort of qualifying statement to stand as completley rediculous. (the one about insurgents being freedom fighters), and ive heard multiple times that hezbollah has helped distribute his film in the middle east. if thats something that you think is a-ok, well, then, i guess you and i just have different standards of whats okay in this instance. being glad that moore is there is fine, i guess... i mean, he stirrs things up to be sure.
this article wasnt really about michael moore so much though. it was about the increasingly radical nature of many american liberals. al gore, howard dean, tom daschel, ted kennedy, and yes, even the venerable presidential canidate kerry. they love to hammer over and over again rhetoric of (said in a droning kerry voice) 'this....president... mis-led aaaamericaaa, ., , he went to waaar unjustly, and underr false pretenses... etc etc.
for crying out loud. how do people still buy this crap? how does al gore get a pass when he openly proclaims that our president has 'betrayed america' ? thats rediculous. i guess its fine for these guys to go and slander the right all they want, (and im not talking about the radio or tv guys here like franken or moore, im talking about legit political figures) but the second that there might have been a statement from anysort of republican of prominance that might bear a slight sembalance of 'questioning someones patriotism' these guys just go through the roof. its out of control.
i just dont see how horowitz is wrong in saying that the left is getting more and more fanatical. (this statement is in regards to actual leaders like the aforementioned senators, ex governers, and dnc reps like terry mcaullif.)
Mercy's eyes are blue
When she places them in front of you
Nothing holds a roman candle to
The solemn warmth you feel inside