So long, suckers, Millionaire hedge fund boss thanks idiots and retires

KRASHED

Active member
This guy is badass, here's his farewell letter.

Today I write not to gloat. Given the pain that nearly everyone is experiencing, that would be entirely inappropriate. Nor am I writing to make further predictions, as most of my forecasts in previous letters have unfolded or are in the process of unfolding. Instead, I am writing to say goodbye.

Recently, on the front page of Section C of the Wall Street Journal, a hedge fund manager who was also closing up shop (a $300 million fund), was quoted as saying, "What I have learned about the hedge fund business is that I hate it." I could not agree more with that statement. I was in this game for the money. The low hanging fruit, i.e. idiots whose parents paid for prep school, Yale, and then the Harvard MBA, was there for the taking. These people who were (often) truly not worthy of the education they received (or supposedly received) rose to the top of companies such as AIG, Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers and all levels of our government. All of this behavior supporting the Aristocracy, only ended up making it easier for me to find people stupid enough to take the other side of my trades. God bless America.

There are far too many people for me to sincerely thank for my success. However, I do not want to sound like a Hollywood actor accepting an award. The money was reward enough. Furthermore, the endless list those deserving thanks know who they are.

I will no longer manage money for other people or institutions. I have enough of my own wealth to manage. Some people, who think they have arrived at a reasonable estimate of my net worth, might be surprised that I would call it quits with such a small war chest. That is fine; I am content with my rewards. Moreover, I will let others try to amass nine, ten or eleven figure net worths. Meanwhile, their lives suck. Appointments back to back, booked solid for the next three months, they look forward to their two week vacation in January during which they will likely be glued to their Blackberries or other such devices. What is the point? They will all be forgotten in fifty years anyway. Steve Balmer, Steven Cohen, and Larry Ellison will all be forgotten. I do not understand the legacy thing. Nearly everyone will be forgotten. Give up on leaving your mark. Throw the Blackberry away and enjoy life.

So this is it. With all due respect, I am dropping out. Please do not expect any type of reply to emails or voicemails within normal time frames or at all. Andy Springer and his company will be handling the dissolution of the fund. And don't worry about my employees, they were always employed by Mr. Springer's company and only one (who has been well-rewarded) will lose his job.

I have no interest in any deals in which anyone would like me to participate. I truly do not have a strong opinion about any market right now, other than to say that things will continue to get worse for some time, probably years. I am content sitting on the sidelines and waiting. After all, sitting and waiting is how we made money from the subprime debacle. I now have time to repair my health, which was destroyed by the stress I layered onto myself over the past two years, as well as my entire life -- where I had to compete for spaces in universities and graduate schools, jobs and assets under management -- with those who had all the advantages (rich parents) that I did not. May meritocracy be part of a new form of government, which needs to be established.

On the issue of the U.S. Government, I would like to make a modest proposal. First, I point out the obvious flaws, whereby legislation was repeatedly brought forth to Congress over the past eight years, which would have reigned in the predatory lending practices of now mostly defunct institutions. These institutions regularly filled the coffers of both parties in return for voting down all of this legislation designed to protect the common citizen. This is an outrage, yet no one seems to know or care about it. Since Thomas Jefferson and Adam Smith passed, I would argue that there has been a dearth of worthy philosophers in this country, at least ones focused on improving government.

Capitalism worked for two hundred years, but times change, and systems become corrupt. George Soros, a man of staggering wealth, has stated that he would like to be remembered as a philosopher. My suggestion is that this great man start and sponsor a forum for great minds to come together to create a new system of government that truly represents the common man's interest, while at the same time creating rewards great enough to attract the best and brightest minds to serve in government roles without having to rely on corruption to further their interests or lifestyles. This forum could be similar to the one used to create the operating system, Linux, which competes with Microsoft's near monopoly. I believe there is an answer, but for now the system is clearly broken.

Lastly, while I still have an audience, I would like to bring attention to an alternative food and energy source. You won't see it included in BP's, "Feel good. We are working on sustainable solutions," television commercials, nor is it mentioned in ADM's similar commercials. But hemp has been used for at least 5,000 years for cloth and food, as well as just about everything that is produced from petroleum products. Hemp is not marijuana and vice versa. Hemp is the male plant and it grows like a weed, hence the slang term. The original American flag was made of hemp fiber and our Constitution was printed on paper made of hemp. It was used as recently as World War II by the U.S. Government, and then promptly made illegal after the war was won. At a time when rhetoric is flying about becoming more self-sufficient in terms of energy, why is it illegal to grow this plant in this country?

Ah, the female. The evil female plant -- marijuana. It gets you high, it makes you laugh, it does not produce a hangover. Unlike alcohol, it does not result in bar fights or wife beating. So, why is this innocuous plant illegal? Is it a gateway drug? No, that would be alcohol, which is so heavily advertised in this country. My only conclusion as to why it is illegal, is that Corporate America, which owns Congress, would rather sell you Paxil, Zoloft, Xanax and other additive drugs, than allow you to grow a plant in your home without some of the profits going into their coffers. This policy is ludicrous. It has surely contributed to our dependency on foreign energy sources. Our policies have other countries literally laughing at our stupidity, most notably Canada, as well as several European nations (both Eastern and Western). You would not know this by paying attention to U.S. media sources though, as they tend not to elaborate on who is laughing at the United States this week. Please people, let's stop the rhetoric and start thinking about how we can truly become self-sufficient.

With that I say good-bye and good luck.

All the best,

Andrew Lahde

related article: http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2...king-useconomy
 
guy is a fucking genius. the world would still be on axis if there were more people like him around.
 
*speachless*

Fucking props to the guy. People need to wake the fuck up and realize what is going on here...we're killing ourselves...
 
not taking credit for this but someone pointed this out in my econ class today.
why have we not modeled our entire healthcare system after the one in Europe? free healthcare, free hospital visits, free doctor checkups, etc. Drs get payed slightly less, but the entire system works so much better than the system that we have. Why does the US cease to notice the efficiency of this system and switch? It's simple. The US cannot admit to mistakes made over the last two decades and it would go against what our government does, make big businesses bigger.
In order to solve the present day economic crisis, the three remaining banks plan to buy out as much of the remaining banks as possible because or government and the banks policy has been that they are simply 'too big to fail'. but when they do, thats when we are fucked.
how do we get our money back? start WWIII and then stay aloof of the war and fund other countries in need until we are out of debt. but any WW that comes will decimate the earth.
its nice that as i begin to learn about economics im beginning to learn why the system in US has failed and sucked so much
 
learn a little more and then you can realize that the de-privatization of the American health care system will halt almost 100% of progress in medicine, especially when it comes to treating terminal illness. You socialize the American medical system and you say good bye to ever finding a treatment for AIDS. Pharmaceutical development is just too expensive to be based off of a socialist system like the one in Canada, The government can not afford to fund it on the same level that the private sector can. Over the last 200 years along with the rise of capitalism we have seen a great increase in the value placed on human life. In todays world, even with the struggaling economy people are willing to spend millions of dollars to save or improve their life or the life of a loved one. Not only is the government not intrested in spending 10's of millions of dollars to save a citizens life, they can't afford to. Under a 100% government funded program, you would no longer be able to get expensive treatments for illnesses such as cancer. This is especially true for treatments that may only add a few years to your life. Quite simply it is not within societies intrest to keep you alive for another 4 years at the cost of $10 million. So too bad, mommy is going to die and leave 3 young kids with out a mother because the government could not afford to find a cure for breast cancer, or the current treatments avalible.

Furthermore, famlies themselves would not be able to do so, as the market for private insurance and private doctors is not substantial.

Under a a socialized health care system, only the most common drugs and treatments would be avalible The method/drug that worked 80% - 90% would be used, the other 10% - 20% would be sol. That leaves 30 to 60 million americans, not unable to get health care, just unable to get health care that works. It is not cost effective to treat them. So if the drug that is avalible does not work for you, too bad.

If you think a socialized health care system is the way to go, ask your self why so many Canadians and Europiens come to the US every year for health care? Its better, its more personalized, and there are more options out there in terms of treatments.
 
This guy is pretty smart especially in his analysis of the hierarchical aristocracy that our nations obsession with higher education has created. His economics on the other hand are not as sound and it seems like he lacks an understanding of how the government influences the economy. We don't need a new system, this market collapse is not the end of capitalism, capitalism has not failed. What has failed is neoliberalism the idea of government controlled privatization (I made a thread about this earlier and no one responded). And of course Hemp and Bud should be legal, its cool to hear someone of his stature understands that.

Cool guy, pretty smart.
 
Put his money where is mouth is.

No doubt that he will though. If he has that much money and he writes/thinks like that, he wont be able to sit back and do nothing...
 
just by reading that one article, you can see how much true knowledge this guy has about buisness, government and life in general. the US is on a one way trip down the toilet unless more people like this dude are willing to do something about it.

i especially liked the part where he said about the constant slaving away at a job you hate and you spend your "vacation" on your phone for buisness only to feel more accomplished and better about yourself. what happened to enjoying life and havin fun and doin a job that you love and not just to have all the overrated technology and crap that the media plays up to be so important.

earn just enough to support you, your family and a little more for saving/investing. i dont see the point of working so hard that you work yourself into a hole so-to-speak...

 
of course most bandwagon ns members will support this letter, which happens to be well written, but its just a phony anarchists view on a capitalistic system which actually is supposed to fluctuate in theory. there is another view to all that he is saying. just be a devils advocate here but. so cool he advocates legalization of weed, we may as well vote for him now cause hes like us, right?
 
ok, somebody who is american answer me this. why does socialism equal the devil? ive literally seen or heard attack ads on politicians saying that they lean towards socialism. so does much of the world. maybe not extreme socialism, but moderate. its not a terrible thing.
 
absolute power corrupts absolutely. good luck with communism/socialism. it will never work, its a great idea though. if it was possible i would totally support it.
 
moderate socialism doesn't, but complete socialism does...thats why it is looked at negatively,thats what im saying..
 
communism and socialism are not the same thing. and true communism has never really been done, since it pretty much makes a govt obslete
 
canada and britian, and pretty much the whole commonwealth, runs on moderate socialism. im pretty sure they arent run by crazy dictators. except maybe england. that queen is outta control, with all her antics in the palace
 
i dont consider obama a socialist and i think that people who say that are mostly ignorant. im saying that correlating the two things happens and that is why people fear socialism. why do you turn everything into a debate?

im sorry im probably making so sense at this point ive had a few flasks of crown royal. lets get back to this tomorrow.
 
dude...we are fucked....bottom line. democracy is great but our political system is almost useless at this point, something needs to happen. change. more change than obama can bring haha.
 
i've been emailing that guy he mentions (steven Cohen) back and fourth for some time now regarding a career.....CLAIM

 
Socialism is great...for those that want it. If the Sweeds are happy, then I'm happy for them. I just want a higher level of autonomy in even the most basic proceedings of my life.
America, stop lying to yourself. Stop pretending that you're iconographic source of free markets, when we simply aren't anymore. We've become so concerned with interests overseas, both political and resource based, that US trade law is riddled with tariffs and leans - we're not even playing by our own ideology anymore and it makes me sad.
As to the earlier question about why Americans are repulsed by socialism, let me drop a little history:
When the Constitution was written, it was the first document in the history of man that attributed human rights as natural constituents of the human condition, rather than rights bequeathed to the civilian by the state. This is the distinction between natural, and civil law, in terms of how individuals acquire rights. Though socialism may achieve some amiable ends, it does so largely through the willingness of people to submit to a higher degree of control from their governments, namely in the form of higher tax rates. In contraposition to socialism, we can see how a government rooted in natural law would inherently remain smaller and less involved in the lives in individuals, specifically because rights are not derived from governmental institutions but directly from the individual themselves.
This is why it is so frustrating to see both of the major parties languishing in the overgrown mess of the federal government. The Democrats seem to truly believe that if the government gets its hands on enough issues, it can turn the world into a utopia. The Republicans, in a superficial way, react against this reasoning but end up increasing the governments size and influence anyway. I've lived in Washington, worked in politics, and its ridiculous how large the government has become compared to how little it has accomplished. Quick example - 90% of the houses that have been rebuilt in New Orleans have been done through private charities with 100% private funding (Habitat for Humanity is a big one). The government has done almost nothing to fix the situation, not that the don't want to help, but that the red tape makes getting things done like walking through a mine field. But, at the end of the day the Federal Government is a great way to make money - heres a lesson kids, get a lobbyist, seriously - and thats probably why it stays so large.
I'm an originalist on most things - I think the Constitution eloquently describes not only the nature of man, but provides a powerful way to govern in a just fashion. Best of all, pretty much everyone can pick the thing up and immediately understand their rights. Juxtapose that against the tax law, which is something like 90,000 pages long. Just because the founding happened so long ago doesn't mean these guys weren't smart: they knew how to keep it simple. Consider this; the Constitution is short, under 10 pages and effectively governs 300 million people, the third largest country in the world. In comparison the Toyota policy handbook, is over 30 pages long, and holds sway over only 3 million people.
Socialism certainly is a way to go, and it works pretty well. But don't forget that there are other alternatives to a collectivist model of rights, some of which have been pretty effective in helping people gain better lives. America didn't get to the top of the world by accident, there was some good philosophy there. Bad ethos, and disillusionment have taken over, and the American ivory tower seems poised to topple. Wake up kids. Get educated, listen to stuff you might not have heard before and make a truly informed decision.
 
Please dont try to speak on our behalfs, its embarassing...I would NEVER trade our healthcare system for you poor excuse of 'healthcare'

The canadian people you are talking about who go to the US for healthcare are rich/dumb bastards who spend way too much on everything anyways. My grandparents wont even step foot in your country anymore (and they lived in florida for 20+ years) because they are terrified of the bills and shit that would arise should they end up in a hospital down there. Real sweet system you have down there...

Come live here and then tell me you'd rather spend six figures on a surgery in the states rather then deal with our "dreaded socialist" healthcare system.

My best friend was hit by a car on thursday and he has been in ICU with severe head trama since then. He's had numerous scan/surgeries and he always has a nurse on him (24/7). His family and friends are just gripped with this but there is no mention of a bill at the end and it makes everything so much easier on those dealing with these tragedies.

If this was the US, his family would have to sell their house to pay for the level kind of care he is recieving but instead, our taxes dollars cover it and everyone gets to keep their home.

 
It sounds like your committed to the idea that individual effort is futile; efficient cause is only attributable to the presuppositions of the society into which you are born. I'm sure you feel Horatio Alger is either a fool or a liar, but in either case you would argue the story he peddles is seriously misguided. And I might even be willing to agree with you; it is highly improbable that a Steinbeck character, swathed in destitution, could ever gain access to the world of the elite. Inequality of opportunity, which is what seems to be your focus in the quoted passage, is a real problem that seems to evade solution.

We can talk about schools, drugs, cops or jobs as barriers to opportunity and everything that can be done to to achieve success in flattening opportunity should be. It seems to me the best way to achieve this sort of flattening is by giving people more choice rather than less - school vouchers, decriminalization - but thats my politics.

Beyond opportunity is practice, and there I have little sympathy. Hard work and talent both should be rewarded. The ethos has certainly grown perverse, 200 million dollar severance packages and opulent company sponsored events are not in the realm of the reasonable, but that doesn't necessitate a response as stiff as "capitalism is dead", and requiring the highest producers in an economy to effectively spend 3/4 of their time on behalf of the federal government.

I know I'm not going to change your mind, so I'm not even going to try. I would say this though - my grandfather was one of those Stienbeck characters, straight out of Grapes of Wrath; a destitute bastard child in the mid thirties dust bowl of Oklahoma. through hard work and perseverance he made his own success. Fuck, maybe he's just damn lucky, but praising his context would be like praising a canvas for the work of a painter. I'll admit, I do enjoy some advantages from his success, but as a true believer in that lie you called the "American Dream" he is not leaving me some fat inheritance, he expects me to make it on my own. And frankly, I wouldn't want it any other way.

 
Although I strongly agree with the letter. I also agree that it is nothing more than a well written letter. The guy has pretty good ideas but has put none of them into action. Before this ive never even heard of the guy now im supposed to believe he is some sort of mesiah. Im all for some of his concepts but he doesnt impress me as a person anymore than anyone else. If i can say ive learned one thing it is that no one is right or wrong in almost every situation, there are always two sides to every story.
 
I believe that Jeffersonism is possibly the best solution for modern day America. Basically Jeffersonism is a weak central government but strong regional, where government taxes are next to nothing and small tariffs are placed on imports allowing American good to compete with for example Chinnese goods. If Chinnese good and American goods are the same price American goods will out sell them for there superior quilty. Also to support the industry building factories is a must where we need to abolish the unions and also giving big corperation who set up factories major taxes cuts alowing maufacturing costs to be some what compareable to the Aisan maunfactoring costs alowing big corporations to invest in the American market wail still being able to supply their workers with a "livable wage" To be turly self suffecent we need to invest in renewable resources.

In this goverment the millitary buget and govermental programs are slashed causing a need for jobs which the factories would supply.

This system would create a favorable trade and a rebounded in the stock market but would take years to impament

Also: Dear Mr. Obama

I request you end the war on durgs as you know you can't win and with the economy in a resesion i cant efford nugs

Dan
 
Back
Top