TBH, I always want to blame Crystal, so sure, bias acknowledged, but hear me out:
Crystal made some moves this year that churned a lot of skiers from being Crystal Skiers into Ikon Skiers. The resort made decisions to invest in attracting a destination-minded consumer rather than improving existing value for their core consumer.
this has shifted the ikon reciprocity arrangement at summit from being a value-add to the core pillar of the value proposition for Washington area skiers. The brunt of absorbing this falls to Snoqualmie. Sure, Snoq limits their pass sales, but the ikon redemption goes from unexpected problem to guaranteed situation.
And in order to address, Summit has to be the one that fixes these things. Seems kinda BS. I do wish they would turn off the reciprocity arrangement, or have a much harder cap on ikon reservation day tickets. But the situation we're facing, in my opinion, is based entirely off of Crystal's decision making.
It's kind of like someone rear-ending you on the highway and saying, "nah it's chill my cousin will take care of this." But that cousin lives 3 hours away, has a lot on his plate already, and doesn't have the bandwidth to deal with the repercussions. He's a good guy, will try hard, but how much can you really expect?
But i hear it's been pretty country clubby up at Crystal so far with skate-on lifts and untouched pow. So I'm happy for ya.