Too many threads on this. Yeah, yeah. Harvey's a big traitor to his homeland. We know. The funny thing is that mags like freeskier have, I am told, the ability to discriminate between Canadian and US email addresses... so they didn't HAVE to annoy everyone up here with US-only renewals. Not that it's a big loss anyway. It's free because no one in their right mind would pay money for it.
As for Hunt's comments, new magazines that are "trying" aren't the problem. But you actually consider ski time a little fledgling, growth mag? Bullshit. It is, as someone said, bad freeskier leftovers. You don't support a magazine just because it's "new" and it "might get better" if they have little to no creative direction. The problem with ski time is, it's trite, it's uninspired, it's mass-produced garbage intent on capturing the short attention spans of kids who see an oakley one-piece on the cover and an urban down rail, and think "I IDENTIFY WITH THIS IMAGE". That's not the skiing I want to support... there's nothing there but flashy colours, lackluster no-effort editing (which manifests itself in the terrible product you're defending with the "give it time to develop" argument), and bandwagon mentality.
Bottom line, I'd rather read Powder, and that's saying something. Something really disappointing, because the resources were there.
Right, that's my piece, last post in this thread or any related.