S sktrkdo7 Active member May 6, 2006 #1 im like 5'5" think i could get away with ridin the mik d pros or would they be to big
eheath Active member Staff member May 6, 2006 #10 You obviously have a small penis then. Ratio of height to ski size represents size of penis. This shows it in action: you: 160.02 to 169 - 8.98 difference him: 160.02 to 175 - 13.98 differce hence your penis is small, his is big.
You obviously have a small penis then. Ratio of height to ski size represents size of penis. This shows it in action: you: 160.02 to 169 - 8.98 difference him: 160.02 to 175 - 13.98 differce hence your penis is small, his is big.
G gaperslayer Member Jun 21, 2006 #21 a ratio is not a difference.... and also if the ratio of height to ski size represents penis size, that would mean a taller person with a smaller ski would have a larger penis. you are clearly an idiot.
a ratio is not a difference.... and also if the ratio of height to ski size represents penis size, that would mean a taller person with a smaller ski would have a larger penis. you are clearly an idiot.
my_ar5_steeze Active member Jun 21, 2006 #24 man , short skis suck, long skis truck, thats wat i go by
MrPantyDropper Active member Jun 21, 2006 #26 Yeah you do you fucking pussy. Your as tall as me now, and I'm riding 31cm longer than you. What the hell ashley? Man up and get some 190s.
Yeah you do you fucking pussy. Your as tall as me now, and I'm riding 31cm longer than you. What the hell ashley? Man up and get some 190s.
poofartpee Active member Jun 21, 2006 #27 around 175 would be tops ud want to go unless u like ur skis super long