Ski idea what do you think about

[sander_h]

what do u think about this ski. 186 145/130/145 and super rockered and super soft

 

[sander_h]

just wonderin

 

[bigwhite.steeze]

sounds expensive.sounds overkill.

 

[brenker]

on a scale of 1 to 10 i dont think thats a great design for a ski.

 

[funk.]

well i'm 100% in love with it...

and whats the context?

 

[anxju]

sounds like 2 snowbards strapped to your feet. ^you spelled waist wrong

 

[californiagrown]

130 is too wide if your looking for a pollard like ski, go 110-120 in the waist, it's plenty wide

 

[garrett.]

make it a 183

149

119

149

 

[CHARLES.BRONSON]

keep em symmetrical like that, but go narrower, 105-110 ish if you wanna jump em, 110-115ish for pollard stuff. i got bacons and i would hate em if they were any wider (115)

 

[titsLOL]

sounds fun for riding park in 10 feet of snow.

 

[ski-Froggy]

umm... sounds pretty much just like moment melee's, minus 10mm

 

[nkmo.]

That would be an EP Pro with less sidecut and rocker throughout instead of early-rise.

 

[Fish_Sandwich.]

How about a suuuper stiff (like you can't even butter at all) rockered ski

with dimensions 103/150/103, and it's not a twin tip.

 

[brenker]

stop bein a bitch and mount up some waterskis

 

[Matty_C]

way too much reverse sidecut. that wouldn't work at all.

 

[hollygrove]

I don't think he was serious. Or I hope to god he wasn't.