Should you buy ON3Ps?

skierman_jack

Active member
My philosophy with skis has always been find a cheap deal on 180+ skis that I can bolt my pivot 18s to and get me through a season. Because of that I’ve been on all sorts of skis. For the longest time I refused to get on the ON3P wave but I found a good deal in October and I’m here to share my season review.

so I’m 5’ 10” 165lbs and I ski park in NY and CO, as well as a lot of street skiing this year. I ended up with 181 Kartel (Jeffrey) 96s mounted 1 back with pivots. I hit big jumps a lot; corks and such. I also spend a lot of time smashing rails both in the park and in the street.

let me start by saying I love these skis. Best skis I’ve owned. But they are NOT for everyone and they are NOT the end all be all. Here’s my honest opinion. ON3Ps are not soft. They are not flexy. They are not light. They are not snappy. They reward confident skiing. Going fast, slamming features, throwing down, and being rough. They like to be abused and the faster and more aggressive you get the better they are. My first few days on these were pretty uncomfortable especially coming off of soft and snappy icelantics. I was nervous to go fast and ski confidently because they felt so iffy at low speed and making low speed butters. They are also very stiff and so it felt just really hard to get them to behave or do what you wanted. But as the season went on and I got my feet back under me they really came alive. ON3Ps will not bail you out. They will wash out and hang up on you if you don’t stomp. But when you stomp on these skis it will feel unlike any other. So if you like going fast and skiing with your balls out all the time you’ll probably like these. Another point to make is the amount of energy these skis have. The first time you hit a side hit or jump on these skis you will be shocked. They P-O-P. It’s borderline ridiculous. If you power them up good they will put you 3-4 feet up before you can blink. That can make them a little unwieldy and unpredictable but that is a compromise I am okay with. A smaller person or a more delicate skier will definitely feel overwhelmed with them though. Because they’re stiff, stable, and energetic they really power through slop and slush and are passable groomer rippers. Small point about that tho the squared tips ARE noticeable. It’s super subtle but I have felt them hang up a TINY bit when I’m really leaning them over. These skis obviously have a ton of rocker but most of that rocker is seen in the tip splay. They actually have less measured rocker then my icelantics did. For the most part they’re pretty flat underfoot with maybe a couple mm of camber. The dramatic tip splay does make them iconically fun for butters when you put enough force into them. I skied 181s and would probably be fine on 186s. 181s were nice on rails and east coast but 186s woulda been nice for out in CO and on jumps but it really isn’t that big a deal. Now for the magic word: durability. They’re fine. They’re about on par with most if not a tiny bit better. I bought mine used but without any edge damage. After about 20 days of park this season they have 6-7 edge cracks and some edge/sidewall separation. Normal stuff to see with how aggressively I ski. Park skis break. It is what it is

so to conclude: they’re great skis in the right hands. They do not make you a better skier. The guys that tear on ON3Ps are good because they’re talented skiers. But for the right person who skies aggressively and likes to go huge all the time these will compliment and supplement that style so well. And that’s what it comes down to. If they’re for you then they’re really for you and if they’re not then they’re really not. Get out and try a pair if you can because they’re really unique and might be a great fit for you.
 
14414012:CatdickBojangles said:
Pretty spot on. The Jeffrey 96 is probably my favorite ski of all time. Loved it so much I had to get the 108.

102 191 is my fav ski ever hands down.

perfect daily in MT
 
Nice honest review. People just need to know what they like and what they're getting going into it. No single brand or model will be good for everyone. Also depends on the day, conditions and whether you take a shit before going out.

I find No poop = no pop
 
10/10 review. Have you had any issues with binding holes rotting/stripping out? Happens on half-ish of the on3ps I’ve seen / known kids who’ve had em.
 
ON3P’s will make you a better skier if you are strong enough to handle them. And they absolutely last longer then any armada or rossignol or faction I have ever had. Your edges wouldn’t have cracked if you woulda got their factory park detune and didn’t slam into rails. Smooth it out…. Fu*k it. On3p>everything else
 
the one thing that I would add to this is the base durability. I ski a lot of fucked up tree runs that are full of rocks. I'm not a huge park skier but I love ripping the trees so I don't destroy skis through edge damage, I destroy them with core shots. This season I literally skied down hiking trails where the tips of my skis were bouncing off of rocks constantly. My on3ps still have 0 core shots. after doing this type of shit for 2 seasons. Idk what makes the bases different but it works
 
14414027:weastcoat said:
10/10 review. Have you had any issues with binding holes rotting/stripping out? Happens on half-ish of the on3ps I’ve seen / known kids who’ve had em.

Weird how I have been riding them for a decade, know tons of people that ski them, and I have never seen this. Maybe your local shop doesn't use wood glue when they do a mount.
 
14414047:Session said:
Weird how I have been riding them for a decade, know tons of people that ski them, and I have never seen this. Maybe your local shop doesn't use wood glue when they do a mount.

I've never seen this or heard of it happening either.
 
14414047:Session said:
Weird how I have been riding them for a decade, know tons of people that ski them, and I have never seen this. Maybe your local shop doesn't use wood glue when they do a mount.

Honestly probably it. I’ve been doing quite a lot of ski servicing/mounting on my own In the past year… I always load the holes with epoxy and haven’t had anyone come back to me with their on3ps stripped, I’ve probably done 8 pairs.
 
14414075:weastcoat said:
Honestly probably it. I’ve been doing quite a lot of ski servicing/mounting on my own In the past year… I always load the holes with epoxy and haven’t had anyone come back to me with their on3ps stripped, I’ve probably done 8 pairs.

I’m sure you’re asking customers before you make it so they can’t remount their skis, right?
 
Not yet but I’m bracing for impact

14414027:weastcoat said:
10/10 review. Have you had any issues with binding holes rotting/stripping out? Happens on half-ish of the on3ps I’ve seen / known kids who’ve had em.
 
14414047:Session said:
Weird how I have been riding them for a decade, know tons of people that ski them, and I have never seen this. Maybe your local shop doesn't use wood glue when they do a mount.

When I unmounted my mags that were mounted by the same local shop, I could loosely take the screws out with my nondominant hand. Only skied them for about a season too.
 
14414103:JacksonA125 said:
I’m sure you’re asking customers before you make it so they can’t remount their skis, right?

The screws can still come out. Some kind of glue is always a good idea. Even then, one needs to check the screws frequently by hand. Once a screw gets a tiny bit loose, then it gets wet in there, and all bets may be off.
 
14414154:MaimHelp said:
When I unmounted my mags that were mounted by the same local shop, I could loosely take the screws out with my nondominant hand. Only skied them for about a season too.

Every one I have unmounted has required a soldering iron and Popeye forearms.
 
can you expand on the square tip part? I'm thinking about getting square tip skis next season? what exactly did you notice about them?

topic:skierman_jack said:
My philosophy with skis has always been find a cheap deal on 180+ skis that I can bolt my pivot 18s to and get me through a season. Because of that I’ve been on all sorts of skis. For the longest time I refused to get on the ON3P wave but I found a good deal in October and I’m here to share my season review.

so I’m 5’ 10” 165lbs and I ski park in NY and CO, as well as a lot of street skiing this year. I ended up with 181 Kartel (Jeffrey) 96s mounted 1 back with pivots. I hit big jumps a lot; corks and such. I also spend a lot of time smashing rails both in the park and in the street.

let me start by saying I love these skis. Best skis I’ve owned. But they are NOT for everyone and they are NOT the end all be all. Here’s my honest opinion. ON3Ps are not soft. They are not flexy. They are not light. They are not snappy. They reward confident skiing. Going fast, slamming features, throwing down, and being rough. They like to be abused and the faster and more aggressive you get the better they are. My first few days on these were pretty uncomfortable especially coming off of soft and snappy icelantics. I was nervous to go fast and ski confidently because they felt so iffy at low speed and making low speed butters. They are also very stiff and so it felt just really hard to get them to behave or do what you wanted. But as the season went on and I got my feet back under me they really came alive. ON3Ps will not bail you out. They will wash out and hang up on you if you don’t stomp. But when you stomp on these skis it will feel unlike any other. So if you like going fast and skiing with your balls out all the time you’ll probably like these. Another point to make is the amount of energy these skis have. The first time you hit a side hit or jump on these skis you will be shocked. They P-O-P. It’s borderline ridiculous. If you power them up good they will put you 3-4 feet up before you can blink. That can make them a little unwieldy and unpredictable but that is a compromise I am okay with. A smaller person or a more delicate skier will definitely feel overwhelmed with them though. Because they’re stiff, stable, and energetic they really power through slop and slush and are passable groomer rippers. Small point about that tho the squared tips ARE noticeable. It’s super subtle but I have felt them hang up a TINY bit when I’m really leaning them over. These skis obviously have a ton of rocker but most of that rocker is seen in the tip splay. They actually have less measured rocker then my icelantics did. For the most part they’re pretty flat underfoot with maybe a couple mm of camber. The dramatic tip splay does make them iconically fun for butters when you put enough force into them. I skied 181s and would probably be fine on 186s. 181s were nice on rails and east coast but 186s woulda been nice for out in CO and on jumps but it really isn’t that big a deal. Now for the magic word: durability. They’re fine. They’re about on par with most if not a tiny bit better. I bought mine used but without any edge damage. After about 20 days of park this season they have 6-7 edge cracks and some edge/sidewall separation. Normal stuff to see with how aggressively I ski. Park skis break. It is what it is

so to conclude: they’re great skis in the right hands. They do not make you a better skier. The guys that tear on ON3Ps are good because they’re talented skiers. But for the right person who skies aggressively and likes to go huge all the time these will compliment and supplement that style so well. And that’s what it comes down to. If they’re for you then they’re really for you and if they’re not then they’re really not. Get out and try a pair if you can because they’re really unique and might be a great fit for you.
 
14414045:hi_vis360 said:
the one thing that I would add to this is the base durability. I ski a lot of fucked up tree runs that are full of rocks. I'm not a huge park skier but I love ripping the trees so I don't destroy skis through edge damage, I destroy them with core shots. This season I literally skied down hiking trails where the tips of my skis were bouncing off of rocks constantly. My on3ps still have 0 core shots. after doing this type of shit for 2 seasons. Idk what makes the bases different but it works

Fr, I’ve skied this early season and had nothing but tiny scratches. The bases are crazy compared to anything else I’ve had
 
14414175:JacksonA125 said:
When you use epoxy versus wood glue, usually the screws are pretty toast and you can’t remount with the same ones

False. Screws come out unscathed, no glue attached to them. The holes are fine too.
 
crazy to see a quality post from this guy. I'd disagree on the wash out though. Jeffrey's have gotten me out of sticky situations by just letting them do what they want.

100% agree, though this is definitely only specific to the Jeffrey/kartel.

Magnuses ski completely different. They seem almost completely opposed.

Try and ski with a Jeffery mindset on the kartels and you'll have a bad, bad time. Vice versa as well. You dance on the magnus. You obliterate on the Jeffrey.
 
“Going fast, slamming features, throwing down, and being rough. They like to be abused and the faster and more aggressive you get the better they are”

1036594.jpeg
 
14414181:CantThinkOfaName said:
can you expand on the square tip part? I'm thinking about getting square tip skis next season? what exactly did you notice about them?

Make's almost no difference. I think it looks cooler, but other than that it doesn't affect anything.
 
Let me also add that the Kartel (Jeffery) is a particularly stiff ski. The Crushin Cans (Previously Magnus) is softer by a decent margin and also a bit more symmetrical. I prefer the sidecut on it to the Jeffery. That being said, I'm currently on the mango 100 which has a different sidecut profile and is also stiffer like the jeffery and I have loved it this season vs previous seasons on the Magnus and Karel/Jeffery. They just don't do anything poorly. I've been ripping cliffs, pow, rails, jumps, tranny, going fast as hell, etc. I'm a bigger boii at 6ft 230lbs and I don't feel the same about any of my ON3P's I've ridden with what you said about them being catchy on landing. Every time I loop out of a butter, I end up doing like a 270 on the ground and riding away fine. Haven't had edge catches in years.

I'll also add that everytime I look at my skis, it makes me want to go rip. They really do just beg you to abuse them and charge, which I love about them. You don't have to be careful or mind the ski you are on. You can just go fuck shit up.

topic:skierman_jack said:
My philos ophy with skis has always been find a cheap deal on 180+ skis that I can bolt my pivot 18s to and get me through a season. Because of that I’ve been on all sorts of skis. For the longest time I refused to get on the ON3P wave but I found a good deal in October and I’m here to share my season review.

so I’m 5’ 10” 165lbs and I ski park in NY and CO, as well as a lot of street skiing this year. I ended up with 181 Kartel (Jeffrey) 96s mounted 1 back with pivots. I hit big jumps a lot; corks and such. I also spend a lot of time smashing rails both in the park and in the street.

let me start by saying I love these skis. Best skis I’ve owned. But they are NOT for everyone and they are NOT the end all be all. Here’s my honest opinion. ON3Ps are not soft. They are not flexy. They are not light. They are not snappy. They reward confident skiing. Going fast, slamming features, throwing down, and being rough. They like to be abused and the faster and more aggressive you get the better they are. My first few days on these were pretty uncomfortable especially coming off of soft and snappy icelantics. I was nervous to go fast and ski confidently because they felt so iffy at low speed and making low speed butters. They are also very stiff and so it felt just really hard to get them to behave or do what you wanted. But as the season went on and I got my feet back under me they really came alive. ON3Ps will not bail you out. They will wash out and hang up on you if you don’t stomp. But when you stomp on these skis it will feel unlike any other. So if you like going fast and skiing with your balls out all the time you’ll probably like these. Another point to make is the amount of energy these skis have. The first time you hit a side hit or jump on these skis you will be shocked. They P-O-P. It’s borderline ridiculous. If you power them up good they will put you 3-4 feet up before you can blink. That can make them a little unwieldy and unpredictable but that is a compromise I am okay with. A smaller person or a more delicate skier will definitely feel overwhelmed with them though. Because they’re stiff, stable, and energetic they really power through slop and slush and are passable groomer rippers. Small point about that tho the squared tips ARE noticeable. It’s super subtle but I have felt them hang up a TINY bit when I’m really leaning them over. These skis obviously have a ton of rocker but most of that rocker is seen in the tip splay. They actually have less measured rocker then my icelantics did. For the most part they’re pretty flat underfoot with maybe a couple mm of camber. The dramatic tip splay does make them iconically fun for butters when you put enough force into them. I skied 181s and would probably be fine on 186s. 181s were nice on rails and east coast but 186s woulda been nice for out in CO and on jumps but it really isn’t that big a deal. Now for the magic word: durability. They’re fine. They’re about on par with most if not a tiny bit better. I bought mine used but without any edge damage. After about 20 days of park this season they have 6-7 edge cracks and some edge/sidewall separation. Normal stuff to see with how aggressively I ski. Park skis break. It is what it is

so to conclude: they’re great skis in the right hands. They do not make you a better skier. The guys that tear on ON3Ps are good because they’re talented skiers. But for the right person who skies aggressively and likes to go huge all the time these will compliment and supplement that style so well. And that’s what it comes down to. If they’re for you then they’re really for you and if they’re not then they’re really not. Get out and try a pair if you can because they’re really unique and might be a great fit for you.
 
14414297:Schoess said:
Make's almost no difference. I think it looks cooler, but other than that it doesn't affect anything.

It makes a big difference in how the J118 skis compared to older Jeffrey/Kartel's/Caylors in that width.
 
14414316:Session said:
It makes a big difference in how the J118 skis compared to older Jeffrey/Kartel's/Caylors in that width.

Can you explain? I’ve always wondered. I thought it was a weight or swing weight thing.
 
14414393:CatdickBojangles said:
Can you explain? I’ve always wondered. I thought it was a weight or swing weight thing.

Twofold.

In the tip the taper does a better job of slicing through crud and variable snow. I don't see it as much of a problem on the skinnier ski's but on a 118 the less tapered blunt tip does more pushing than slicing.

At the back of the ski without taper there was a lot more float in the ass end than say a Billygoat. The float coupled with the more progressive mount led to a felling of going over the bars at times.

These may not be HUGE issues in a continental snowpack, but in a consistent maritime snowpack they are more noticeable.
 
Anyone have experience with the soft flex option im getting some customs next year and I wanna know how soft they are
 
14414425:BLandz said:
Anyone have experience with the soft flex option im getting some customs next year and I wanna know how soft they are

There great, takes a day or two to get used to but then it’s awesome. I’m riding a custom mango 100 with the soft core, and it powers through decently deep snow too. Also just rides over corn and small moguls.
 
They’re the best. I will never be able to go back to another ski. I have developed a crippling On3p addiction

1036666.jpeg
 
I'm wondering how the mango 90 compares to the magnus, because someday my 5 pairs of mags will all finally be broken and I will need new on3ps. And I don't want to go wider than 90
 
14414509:Rparr said:
I'm wondering how the mango 90 compares to the magnus, because someday my 5 pairs of mags will all finally be broken and I will need new on3ps. And I don't want to go wider than 90

Convince Scott to bring back the Prester
 
14414047:Session said:
Weird how I have been riding them for a decade, know tons of people that ski them, and I have never seen this. Maybe your local shop doesn't use wood glue when they do a mount.

Had it happen on my FRs after 2.5 years. After sidewall started going I'm assuming the core rotted, then snapped behind the binding but was still somewhat rideable. Then eventually the heal piece ripped out of the core and brought the topsheet along for the ride.

Got a pair of kartels that I use as an all mountain ski because they are fun to ski fast, but I'm not strong enough to have fun on them in the park or low speeds.
 
i’m pretty sure the mango is just the evolution of the magnus so they should be pretty similar

14414509:Rparr said:
I'm wondering how the mango 90 compares to the magnus, because someday my 5 pairs of mags will all finally be broken and I will need new on3ps. And I don't want to go wider than 90
 
14414728:will.irwin said:
i’m pretty sure the mango is just the evolution of the magnus so they should be pretty similar

This right here. If an athlete leaves, and the name of the ski changes. The ski doesn't really change. The athlete didn't design the ski with their name on it. Athletes have a lot less input on a ski design than you may think.
 
just throwing my two cents in; the kartels (mine are 108s) are the single most well constructed skis i've ever ridden in 17 years of freeskiing.

the flex profile is unique from any other ski i've used - yes, it is stiff, but it is also responsive and wickedly poppy. they still butter quite well if you are capable of throwing butters at speed, or learn the flex pattern and can break it at will. i bought the skis used before this season, have put at least 30 or 40 days on them, and havent noticed any degradation of flex.

due to the stiff flex and possibly the shape, they ride incredibly well in almost any terrain. they especially shine in chop, and honestly they trick very well. i've been skiing them as my park ski, and trick them outside of the park quite often. as far as crossover park/all-mountain freestyle skis go, these are the best, imo. i definitely agree with whoever said they can give the feeling of going over the handlebars when mounted close to center, though.

i like the look of the blunt nose, but have caught my tips directly on the front of the blunted area while nollieing at least twice this season. i wouldn't change the design for that reason, and haven't really noticed any particular difference in skiing that i can attribute to the blunted tip otherwise. my other skis are whitewalkers, and feel noticeably slashier and cuttier, so i think the blunted tip *maybe* just inclines you to charge rather than slash and turn. idk.
 
14414536:apc.fr said:
Convince Scott to bring back the Prester

I always wanted those. Though I feel like they only came in super long lengths and I'm short? I don't remember. And at the time I was like a broke teenager so I wasn't getting new skis anyway.
 
I have a pair of Billy goats. And I absolutely fucking love them. Granted they are a very specific kind of ski but I definitely get them on edge and carve up the cord for fun. But in the soft stuff is where they shine. I am currently saving up for a custom pair of 102 Jeffreys right now
 
14414821:DrZoidberg said:
I always wanted those. Though I feel like they only came in super long lengths and I'm short? I don't remember. And at the time I was like a broke teenager so I wasn't getting new skis anyway.

Yea 171 to 181.

Until some showed up as a factory find a few years ago I'd given up.

Thankfully I'm tall enough for the 181s they found. I bought so many skis that day...

Love them all.
 
Back
Top