SENATE REPORT ON IRAQ WAR JUSTIFICATION

Jibtech

Jibtech

Active member
PRE WAR INTELLIGENCE ASSESMENTS ON IRAQ

This is sure gonna be fun to watch... everyone is gonna point fingers at everyone else now... Its finaly out there, what the rest of the world has been saying for the last two years, we had absolutly no buisness invading Iraq.

Meanwhile more people get blown up in Iraq every day for no reason.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Lets say you have 10 000 people, about the number of drunken rowdy males at a Flames playoff game. Armed with nothing more than semi-auto 22\'s and flaming Alberta whiskey, this rag-tag group could fight a successful guerilla campaign against 150 000 US troops plus tens of thousands of coalition troops, costing $5 bil a MONTH and lasting at least 2 years. Pretty pathetic considering the US spends more on its military per year than every other country COMBINED.

-221
 
yeah, we go in to free them from martial law, and once we hand them back power, they say they can enact martial law again. what good we've done for the people of Iraq!

 
we got saddam out of power. beyond that, the nation is ruined. Don't pull this bullshit about us freeing them.

-Pat Melvin

WBP|films

'Who's not 18 yet? What? LA LA LA LA LA LA! I can't hear you.' - Jay
 
im not about to read that whole report but i watched the news just a couple minutes ago on the subject and they said it was all the cia. was it bush at all or was it the cia that told bush all the shit we went to war for

 
I think the administration might have had some idea, when while preparing to give a press conference concerning Iraq before the fighting there had begun, Colin Powell threw his papers up in the air and said 'I'm not reading this. This is bullshit!' Read the thread entitled Mad at Bush. They knew.

------------

In a haze

A stormy haze

I’ll be around

I’ll be loving you

Always

Always

Here I am

And I’ll take my time

Here I am

And I’ll wait in line

Always

Always...
 
They'd have to be complete mornons to make the statments they did pre-war... (and infact, they are complete morons, fancy that, it all makes sence) They knew they didn't have a single CIA agent on the ground, and they were relying on disenters of the saddam regime for information regarding wepons programs... seriously, think about it... some guy whos entire family was probably killed by saddam is probably interested in unseating the fucker at all costs... what a good way to do it, exagerate claims to the US, the most powerful military in the world, in hopes that they swoop in and fuck shit up.

I'd like to think the government would take information from a person like that with a grain of salt. There had to be pressure from the Bush admin to find dirt on Iraq, some kind, anykind. I don't buy it when they say there wasn't.

I'm mean.. if all this is so apparent now, why the fuck wasn't it apparent then? Nothing has changed.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Lets say you have 10 000 people, about the number of drunken rowdy males at a Flames playoff game. Armed with nothing more than semi-auto 22\'s and flaming Alberta whiskey, this rag-tag group could fight a successful guerilla campaign against 150 000 US troops plus tens of thousands of coalition troops, costing $5 bil a MONTH and lasting at least 2 years. Pretty pathetic considering the US spends more on its military per year than every other country COMBINED.

-221
 
^ in answer to your signature

they dont have semi-22s and whiskey

they're armed with fully automatic ak47s, rocket proppelled grenades, mortars, browning . tuck mounted .50 cals, and antiaircraft missles. now you dont want us using a tomahawk missle to hit a couple of men firing at our troops from a basement (understandable, and tactically wise) but at the same time, its very difficult to fight back when these other guys cut through houses, and know the terrain and architecture so well we cant find them,

you wanna talk shit about our soilders, get out there and train, and fight and tell us where we're doing wrong, cause it'll be a cold day in hell when youre a forefront military expert,

as the soilders say 'Vietnam, if you werent there, shut your mouth', same goes for Iraq. bitch, your dogmatic attitude makes me sick

'Really, I gotta say that I'm glad you exist, 'cause if there wasn't there'd be noone to make fun of and diss.'
 
aggro-skate youre rediculous honeslty, I suppourt the soilders alot and cant believe what they are doing and the sacrafices they have made. But that doesnt mean that they are over their fighting and dieing for any less of a stupid reason. Its fucking rediculous and idiotic that we are in Iraq right now.

'Don't fuck with me 'cause I'm going to delete everything you ever post and have ever posted - Flanker, A moderator
 
There is only one thing I hate more then the Busd administration, and that is people who bash our troops. I despise and hate what we've done in Iraq...but will forever support our troops. YOU CAN SUPPORT OUR TROOPS AND NOT SUPPORT THE WAR.

better to burn out...

...then fade away
 
you know why we didnt have any cia agents on the ground right? you know where the intel failiures stem from dont you? yes, im sure you do...

Mercy's eyes are blue

When she places them in front of you

Nothing holds a roman candle to

The solemn warmth you feel inside

 
...And meanwhile, while we argue and point fingers, the number of American casualties in Iraq just passed the 1,000 mark yesterday.

And independent counts (there is no official count) put the number of civilian casualties at over 10,000.

I don't know the solution, but I do know that we're not on the right track.

What I do know is that I can never trust Bush's judgement again (after all, HE was the one who weighed all the evidence and finally declared war, or so we're told) and I doubt whether I will ever be able to trust him again.

-----------------

I'm an atheist/moralist.

My parents were hippies. Both my grandfathers were Mennonite conscientious objectors in WWII. It's complicated.
 
you know why we didnt have any cia agents on the ground right? you know where the intel failiures stem from dont you? yes, im sure you do

Actualy no I don't, and thats why I find it so hard to belive Bush took us to war on the words of disgrunlted exiled Iraqis, highly questionable sorces of information. (they were even questioned, or disproved at the time he made the case for war)

Doesn't it make sence to you? You can't tell me Bush DIDN'T know there weren't CIA agents on the ground in Iraq. He gets a CIA breifing every day, and you mean to tell me he never knew there wern't any opratives on the ground?

I'm going to shit my pants if you try and tell me bill clinton was the reason we didn't have any CIA agent in Iraq.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Lets say you have 10 000 people, about the number of drunken rowdy males at a Flames playoff game. Armed with nothing more than semi-auto 22\'s and flaming Alberta whiskey, this rag-tag group could fight a successful guerilla campaign against 150 000 US troops plus tens of thousands of coalition troops, costing $5 bil a MONTH and lasting at least 2 years. Pretty pathetic considering the US spends more on its military per year than every other country COMBINED.

-221
 
Bill clinton is the reason there was no CIA in Iraq, enjoy the poop dave.

-Pat Melvin

WBP|films

'Who's not 18 yet? What? LA LA LA LA LA LA! I can't hear you.' - Jay
 
Melvs you don't count.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Lets say you have 10 000 people, about the number of drunken rowdy males at a Flames playoff game. Armed with nothing more than semi-auto 22\'s and flaming Alberta whiskey, this rag-tag group could fight a successful guerilla campaign against 150 000 US troops plus tens of thousands of coalition troops, costing $5 bil a MONTH and lasting at least 2 years. Pretty pathetic considering the US spends more on its military per year than every other country COMBINED.

-221
 
you see, when saddam was in power, the country wanst as divided, because there were generally saddam haters (inactive, just minded their own business) and the saddam loyalists ('aristocrats'). Most of the Saddam haters were also AMERICAN haters, because of what they have done to the reigion. NOW that saddam is gone, the country i divided HUGELY, because now the Sunis and shias are agianst eachother (wasnt a big problam before), there are the Saddam loyalists, the american haters, the bystandards, the kurds and other al-quida people all in a mix fucking everything up, before, it was just 2 groups trying to stay out of eachothers way, NOW is everyone hates everyone. How is that free? how is it free for me to get a call every week hearing that my neighbors cousin got shot trying to get a job, or how my buddies uncle got killed in an ambulance, or how my great uncle got shot when he heard something on his roof? Thats free? fuck freedom, lock me in a fucking cell.



Moe

-

Fuck the police.

-

613
 
wow, they probably spent more on printing costs for that fucking report than the war has cost so far

-------------------

First one on the lift, last one off.

Bush-Cheney '04

Member of the Cult for Proud Americans

 
omg, omg, that article is fake, it's all bullshit, THAT'S A LIE!!!!!

(just a little sarcasim on that one)

the war has done many great things. It has taken a ruthless, evil, and just plain horrible man out of Iraq. Saddam killed people by putting them in plastic shedders. People were raped or killed regularly.

whether the country is divided or not, we took saddam our of power. you might not have heard, but a lot of people were really happy when Bush handed over control to the Iraqis. People were throwing candy in the streets and had all sorts of celebration. Nations take time to build, and I'm sure that the people of Iraq will resolve their differences and help each other to build a great nation.

Earlier, someone said that it is easy to blame Clinton, but it's also easy to blame Bush. I think everyone should just stop blaming each other and fix the problems facing our country.

 
^Ok, I usually try to stay out of this shit, but

Ok, yes, it took Saddam out, that’s 1 Pro. I hate the dude, that is true, he had to go.

'You might not have heard, but a lot of people were really happy when Bush handed over control to the Iraqis.'

You might not have heard, but that was 3 out of every 100000 people. I don’t blame you though, if I watched CNN and FOX all day, I too would be ignorant, it’s not your fault : (

'I'm sure that the people of Iraq will resolve their differences and help each other to build a great nation.'

Yes, because we all know that in September, they will al go 'Hey! What are we doing, lets hold hands and sing kum-by-yah, the Americans are here, NOW we are a country that isn’t being controlled by a high force -like before-' (note sarcasm)

'I think everyone should just stop blaming each other and fix the problems facing our country.'

Yes, the problems facing YOUR country, not OTHER countries, stop supporting your leaders who stick their noses in external affairs that get yourselves fucked over. There is something called, voting, go try it, it ‘should’ prevent your incorrect governing, unless it gets rigged like last time.



Moe

-

Fuck the police.

-

613
 
^^Was anyone else waiting for that?

No one has said that taking Saddam out of power was bad. What WAS bad was invading a country on false pretenses and being lied to be our leader. Do you like being lied to?

 
alright, I don't watch CNN because it's just all crap, and I didn't even hear that info from Fox. so you can shut the hell up. point is a lot of people were happy that day. I forgot to add in that the people of Iraq getting along and building a nation would happen eventally. It's going to take a lot of time, but I still think that they can resolve the problems.

I still support the war. And I still support Bush.

 
quantify 'a lot'

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Lets say you have 10 000 people, about the number of drunken rowdy males at a Flames playoff game. Armed with nothing more than semi-auto 22\'s and flaming Alberta whiskey, this rag-tag group could fight a successful guerilla campaign against 150 000 US troops plus tens of thousands of coalition troops, costing $5 bil a MONTH and lasting at least 2 years. Pretty pathetic considering the US spends more on its military per year than every other country COMBINED.

-221
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top