Scratch BC or Pocker Rocket to park?

M

MarT01

Member
I can buy, a one season old, these skis. Which skis will be better on park, or does not matter because it has a same proportions?

thanks

 
Scratch

_________________________

'wow, Ive never been called a tool before. I just love the internet.' -JibGuy

'i think you put the B in buttfuck and i put it in you' -lateralis

'Screw porn, get a girlfriend' -PhattTim

'I just want to be popular on the internet.' -ShitSlam4

'ohhhhh so thats what mutes look like... there gay' -Champion_of_the_wild
 
The pockets are so good for everything out there. i ski them for everything on the mountain.

Huck it and Giver, Don't turn unless stuff gets in your way.
 
both are ill got the same dimmensions. pr is lighter but scratch has a thc core...id say there comparable. i got the scratch and love them and my buddy swears by the pr

 
scratch bc!

centre mounting is the most useless shit out there! sure it may make skiing in the park a little better but all mountain it's shit!

SKIER'S IRRESPONSIBILITY CODE

1.ski FAST at ALL TIMES

2.take MAX air at EVERY opportunity

3.POACH everyone's favourite lines

4.IGNORE all posted signs

5.EVADE patrol at all costs

6.SMOKE big fat stinky ones

7.DRINK to excess

'Stupid fucking Americans!' - Jon Olsson

Truer words never spoken!
 
dude...the foam core will break down in less than a season if you hit park hardcore. go with the scratches because the unreliable foam core in the PRs

 
scratch's bend the PR over and make them take it...hard

_____________________________________

Armada is for TOOLS
 
I really don't see why you would mount a PR or Scratch BC at center. That's such a terrible idea for when you get out of the park. It ends up defeating the purpose of getting a BC-specific ski.

~~~~~~~~~~~~

if i had no hands, id have a tee shirt that said, 'ever been stump fucked?' - cj
 
had pr's then demoed bc's. the bc's are way better all around. stiffer, butter better, more pop and look better. pr's chatter a lot and the core breaks down real quick, so they have no pop. bc's, no contest.

thumbs up
 
I ski park alot and all so ski big muntain and drop cliffs all the time and mine pockets have not lost there stiffness and I'm 172 lbs and ski super hard on them. I ski the 185cm

Huck it and Giver, Don't turn unless stuff gets in your way.
 
^ i used to be a PR advocate but that was until i bent the tails on them, and yes they become noodles after a while just wait ....

___________________________

''Shake it like a polaroid picture''

 
^Can we please just ban these people? If you say something like that in your first 50 posts, it's fair to assume you're not wanted here...

182 BCs = Most versatile major-company twin in production in my opinion. Demoed them once, loved them. Demoed them again in a 188, loved them in a few feet of Baker pow. Do not center mount them, that's idiotic... I'd go mounting line or maybe a few cm forward. No more. Maintain their versatility.

------------

In a haze

A stormy haze

I’ll be around

I’ll be loving you

Always

Always

Here I am

And I’ll take my time

Here I am

And I’ll wait in line

Always

Always...
 
Pocket Rocket over the scratch bc anyday.

better in and out of stuff for bc.

by far the best big m ride ever... that's why they haven't had to change it.

don't listen to the foam thing. it's totally not true.

if anything all rossi skis fall apart after a season.

 
if anything all rossis fall apart after a season? ha!

moving on...my opinion wont be objective seeing as the scratch bc's are my favourite ski ever, but don't go with salomon.

-Joel

~Phunkin Phatt Phreerider~

Capital City Rider

Dragons Lair

lanky steeze
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top