Rudy guiliani- whats not to love?

anti_bunk

anti_bunk

Active member


flash_video_placeholder.png


seriously guys, check out his new ad. its awesome! how can anybody see this ad and vote for somebody else?

 
Guess what, good luck with voting. I made a long reply to this on here, and it apparently got deleted within a couple minutes. If your thoughts on the presidency get censored by mods on Newschoolers, your chance of being heard in the real world are dick. For the record, my sensored post had no curse words or extremely offensive ideas in it.
 
What's not to love?

Guiliani's entire campaign feeds off fear and capitalizes on 9/11 to imply foreign policy strength. Plus, Guiliani tends to surround himself with incompetent cronies even more than Bush (the Kerik scandal anyone?) and his business activities in recent years have been quite shady.

Luckily, Guiliani's personal life and social policy are so detested by the evangelical republican base that he will never get nominated.
 
I think I like him. I think he would make a good president, but I don't agree with his abortion policy. The government shouldn't have to pay for stupid mistakes like that. Strap up people!
 
Sept 11, TERRORISM, Terrorist, Sepember 11, SEPTemBer 11!! terrorists, TERROR,

.. etc.

Fear mongering Plain and simple

FUCK YOU RUDY YOU CORPERATION PUPPET< SUCK A HOG COCK SHITBREATH

 
Guiliani has no real qualifications. The only thing he has to recommend him is his handling of 9/11. Granted he did a good job, but seriously other than that he's got nothing.

His campaign likes to mention how he cleaned up NYC. I was a small child living in the city before it was cleaned up and yes, it was fucking horrible. He can't take full credit for that though. He appointed a really competent police chief who did an amazing job applying the "No Broken Windows" theory. Unfortunately, the second that police chief started getting national acclaim instead of Guiliani, Guiliani's people harassed him until he resigned.
 
the reason he handled 9/11 "well" is because he knew about it before it happened. he shipped off the rubble before it could be examined for evidence of explosives.
 
um corruption? his scandal with using the nypd to protect a girl he had an affair with? his cabinet would be his neighborhood block
 
Except that he lowered taxes something like 20 times in NYC and helped create more jobs, decreasing the unemployment rate
 
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA.

Okay, listen, let me tell you a secret about Rudy. New Yorkers fucking hate Rudy. I've lived in NYC most of my life, and if you took a poll on September 10th 2001, everyone would say Rudy was a fuckhead. He was HEAVILY disliked throughout the entire city. Why? Cause he was a fuckhead. Sure, he cleaned up the town, he dropped crime, but you know what else he did? He imposed his own morals on the city. He attempted to get rid of porn and anything else he deemed dirty. He didn't like the homeless so he issued an order to evict shelters for the homeless and others including for the mentally ill and orphanages. This is AFTER the fucker swept through the town and ordered to arrest all homeless and put them in shelters. Mind you, this didn't fix the problem, just kept it out of sight. Do you fucking realize that he lost a good 90% or so of the civil liberty cases brought up against him? He decided that one of the most artistic neighborhoods in the city, Brooklyn, didn't deserve funding for their art museum. He cut off all funding from the Brooklyn Art Museum for putting up works he found "indecent."

Lastly, the motherfucker banned ferrets. Fuck Rudy.
 
haha ya i heard about that wasn't it on jay leno or something? where he dressed up as his grand mother? so what the guy has a sense of humor
 
I am personally offended that Rudy Guiliani takes credit for being the "hero" of 9/11. I was 2 miles away when it happened and knew a lot of people who died. The heros are the fire fighters and police who ran into the buildings when Rudy was hiding huddled wherever he was.
 
What's not to love is the idea of a MAYOR running on foreign policy, since, you know, mayors deal with foreign countries all the time and are undoubtedly well-versed in that area.
 
Burden of proof is on you, and this government would not have been able to pull off a con this big without screwing up, given their track record.

I've seen Loose Change, all those things. It's crap. We might have had it coming, but the government didn't orchestrate it.
 
I like guliani, except his abortion policy. He sees 9 11 as a way to market himself since so many people are gay democratic liberal bitches.

Haha, it amazes me that people believe that 9 11 was done by the government. Thats the most ridiculous theory ever, the government has no reason to do this. This is pretty much like saying the holocaust isn't real. honestl, grow up, 911 is not a fucking conspiracy theory, yes I watched the video, and its ridiculous because its so easy to edit a video and its no possible and just stop saying it, cuz its disrespectful to the peoopel that died. and don't argue with me cuz i won't respnd. (fuck spelling)

 
That article is proof of nothing at all except that Giuliani, which I do not like, decided to get rid of the rubble quickly.

I state that pigs can fly. Until you can show me that no pig has ever flown, I maintain my position that pigs fly and you are wrong to say they do not.

 
It makes me sad that you are such an idiot.

If you thought for 2 seconds you would know that there are many many many reasons to take down the twin towers. Don't be so blind.

Gah, some peoples kids..

 
disrespectful to the people who died? i would say that the real disrespect comes from people like you who blatantly ignore the facts about that tragic day and continue to propagate the lies and cover up what really happened.
 
You know, if the government really HAD orchestrated all of this, there'd be a bit more than some youtube video to sway people, or there wouldn't even be any dissent for that matter.
 
How to convince a smart man: Show a logical conclusion while including proof and unbiased explanations with facts demonstrating research and comprehension of the subject. Following this process, a set of arguments are posed by external parties questioning the validity of claim. All unsound arguments are refined to be as close to the truth as possible. Then, it is up to the individual to weigh the conclusion and evidence.

How to convince a dumb man: TERRORISM!!!!!

 
I'm not much of a Guiliani fan, but I haven't really heard him mention 9/1l. The thing he talks about most is how he reduced crime in NYC, which he did do a good job of.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top