Rossignol sender 110 or On3p Mango 110?

stonedbrian

stonedbrian

Member
first off I know these skis are meant for different things, however, I believe that they could share a sweet spot between them as an all-mountain freestyle ski.

My main thoughts:

senders are stiffer, metal in the core, less tapered tips for floatation?

mangos are softer (not by much), have bamboo cores, and tapered tips for fast rotations.

I think that both are similar in weight and dimensions, and I think that the main differences are related to the construction of the skis.

Other than that, having the sender have a 191 model is a plus, mangos go to 186 but on3p typically skis a few cm longer in my experience
 
Rossignol all the way. I am in-between sizes on the sender free. 184 - 191 and sized down to the 184. BIG FUCKING MISTAKE. With how fast I end up going on that ski I almost always wish I had the 191. Don't get me wrong. It's an insanely fun ski. The very definition of playful and powerful. PURE BLISS.
 
I've seen so many blown sidewalls on the Sender Free 110 I can't recommend the ski. Sure, it's great to ride and chargy as, but all my homies who ride for Rossi are on their 3rd or 4th pair this season.
 
14601559:tdollo said:
I've seen so many blown sidewalls on the Sender Free 110 I can't recommend the ski. Sure, it's great to ride and chargy as, but all my homies who ride for Rossi are on their 3rd or 4th pair this season.
Click to expand...

Ouch that’s not good
 
14601559:tdollo said:
I've seen so many blown sidewalls on the Sender Free 110 I can't recommend the ski. Sure, it's great to ride and chargy as, but all my homies who ride for Rossi are on their 3rd or 4th pair this season.
Click to expand...

Hmm that sucks. I've been hearing a lot of positives surrounding the Sender Free 110.
 
Durability with skis is tricky because everyone rides differently, but I sold 5 pairs of Sender Free 110s last season and every single pair had to be warrantied due to the same delamination of core and edge right under boot center. I don't know if there's something special about the 191cm ones but i swear those come delamed from the factory lmao.

I've never skied the Mango but ON3P is proven to deliver a top quality product so I'd go with those.
 
14601668:tdollo said:
Durability with skis is tricky because everyone rides differently, but I sold 5 pairs of Sender Free 110s last season and every single pair had to be warrantied due to the same delamination of core and edge right under boot center. I don't know if there's something special about the 191cm ones but i swear those come delamed from the factory lmao.

I've never skied the Mango but ON3P is proven to deliver a top quality product so I'd go with those.
Click to expand...

Yeah I parted ways with some Jeff 100s I had, but they looked brand new after riding on them for a bit. Like not a single top sheet ding or base knick. I have started to gravitate towards Moment, but do want to try another ON3P ski.

Not sure why OP is considering Mango vs Sender Free 110 instead of the Jeff 108. That'd be a better comp.
 
14601668:tdollo said:
Durability with skis is tricky because everyone rides differently, but I sold 5 pairs of Sender Free 110s last season and every single pair had to be warrantied due to the same delamination of core and edge right under boot center. I don't know if there's something special about the 191cm ones but i swear those come delamed from the factory lmao.

I've never skied the Mango but ON3P is proven to deliver a top quality product so I'd go with those.
Click to expand...

too bad about the senders, blackops 118s have been tanks for me except top sheet chips. must be karma for going full dad ski on what we all thought was a blackops 110
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top