And do you know who's funding the 'newspaper' you posted? I doubt it, or even you would see the irony in calling Politifact biased in comparison to the 'Washington Times'... But you don't care anyway, because their 'articles' fit your narrative, so you don't stop to question them. You're holding sources to different standards depending on whether or not you like what they say, that's not thinking critically, that's irrational faith.
Politifact is
very transparent about their funding and donors, your site is not, by the way. But frankly it doesn't matter, because Politifact links their sources at the bottom of each of their article (unlike your source), so if you don't trust their analysis, you're free to skip the article altogether and go straight to their sources to get the actual facts. That's the beauty of proper journalism, it can be easily verified because it's properly sourced.
But it doesn't matter to you what sources they have, you'll take a non-sourced article from a religious cult (in this case the Unification Church) over official statements and documents from the office in question. (again, not talking about Politifact here but the actual sources they linked)
You 'thinking critically' boils down to one simple question: "Do I like what they say?", if yes, then you believe it, if not: "oh they're just corrupt liars, no matter how well sourced and backed up their take is, I'll completely disregard it". You lack intellectual honestly, we could go in circles all day with that 'logic' (or lack thereof).
But please, let's move on to your next claim, please show me your source that CPS is taking children away from families that disagreed with their school board, I'm sure it's from a very reliable, unbiased, and properly sourced publication.
