HiHowAreYou
Member
that house is shit is kinda shit tho ngl
Rhonda DeathSantis
- Thread starter Pachankz
- Start date
Monsieur_Patate
Active member
14463732:Lafam said:
My post was in reply to your point about how one should not 'trust the science', the 'crazies are proven right' throughout history, and how borty should educate himself and pick up some of your 'books', etc. I was not talking about your LGBTQ take in particular, but about your behavior in general when it comes to conspiracy theories.
On this particular topic though, if you really need me to point out what I consider to be a 'conspiracy theory', you're basically saying there is a widespread leftist government agenda to indoctrinate children from a young age to make them gay, gender-fluid or whatever. And you're saying parents opposing this agenda are seeing their children taken away by CPS and are being put on FBI lists. Sure buddy.
Granby_killdozer
Active member
14463838:Monsieur_Patate said:
Indoctrination is not the same thing as turning children gay. Although I will say if a child does come out as gay or non-binary, the parents of that child have a right to know, safe spaces be damned. Progressives absolutely are trying to dismantle heteronormativity in our society and there are countless examples of it. If you have a problem with heteronormativity then you are a delusional mentally ill individual OR you have been indoctrinated to believe something is normal when it isnt, Heterosexual relationships are what is natural for humans and all you have to do to prove that is look at every single other mammalian species (or hell even most sexually dimorphic species except for some frogs).
Hate to burst your bubble buddy, but its literally happening right in front of you there is no hidden "conspiracy. They are promoting the stuff to kindergartners and throwing up hissy fits when told they cant teach that content anymore. Making you believe Ron De Santis is a homophobic devil for saying its time to stop allowing teachers to preach their sexual orientations onto young kids. Have you seen some of the books in the libraries in schools? Parents have gone to school board meetings, reading the books their kids can obtain in school and its vile and disgusting.. Believe it or not. Parents have faced legal repercussions for not allowing their child to transition. also yes the FBI is monitoring some of these events under the label of domestic terrorism. We are living in a clown world.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/may/12/whistleblowers-fbi-probed-parents-under-counterter/
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/may/12/whistleblowers-fbi-probed-parents-under-counterter/
14463838:Monsieur_Patate said:
ASSholebomber22
Active member
14463800:SavageBiff said:
I grew up pretty broke. I always looked up to these suburban monstrosities as the 'rich' kids. My point is the people who bitch the most usually have no idea how good they have it. I'm doing ok now, did the whole 'bootstrap' thing y'all like to meme about.
VTshredder69
Active member
14463838:Monsieur_Patate said:
The problem with trusting in science is that now a days science trusts in the money this is mainly true in the big pharma industry. We witnessed it first hand with COVID.
I'm sorry if you can't agree with that.
Monsieur_Patate
Active member
14463849:Lafam said:
This is exactly what I'm talking about, you find an article from some obscure site and take it as 'truth' because it fits your narrative without making the effort to fact check it. The FBI is only tracking violent threats made against school boards (as they should btw!):https://www.politifact.com/factchec..._JW8Z6gL7Yeu6fKACCtGpJ-XXkRGdH94hfaYIk14vdDmg
"The FBI has never been in the business of investigating parents who speak out or policing speech at school board meetings, and we are not going to start now," the FBI said in a statement. "The FBI’s focus is on violence and threats of violence that potentially violate federal law."
That's why it's tough to take anything you say seriously, you seem to lack the ability to question information and do even the most basic fact checking. You just pick and chose what 'source' to believe solely based on whether or not it fits your narrative.
SavageBiff
Active member
14463851:Biffbarf said:
I grew up broke too , parents did well enough to provide roof, food, school, I went from there to marines to welfare to working 120hr weeks, but never in my life did I look at the wealthy, rich, or doing well people like they were not deserving, I looked at it like , how do I get there, how do I share it with those whom I can, only w/o being a scumbag. When a dad has the pleasure of giving his kid a trust fund and a Benz I’m stoked for the dad, and just hope the kid earned, deserves, or will in the future deserve and appreciate these things.
ASSholebomber22
Active member
14463860:SavageBiff said:
I think we're uh kinda agreeing here but idk
Monsieur_Patate
Active member
14463848:Craw_Daddy said:
Same-sex behavior (comprising courtship, sexual, pair-bonding, and parental activities) has been documented in over 450 species of animals worldwide. Here's a list of mammals doing gay stuff for you:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_animals_displaying_homosexual_behavior
So yeah, while heterosexual is the norm, homosexual behavior is still perfectly "natural", humans are certainly not unique in that regard.
I'd say the progressive 'agenda' is simply for people to stop judging and discriminating on the basis of people's sexual orientation. The point is that while heterosexuality is the 'norm', it doesn't mean it's socially 'superior' to homosexuality or bisexuality. Consenting adults should be able to love each other freely, regardless of their sex, and enjoy the same rights and social privileges, that's all.
By saying homosexual relationships are 'unnatural', you're implying homosexuals are 'inferior' to heterosexuals. If you don't see how that's homophobic then not sure what to tell you.
Funny when people were saying "drain the swamp". Some of y'all are the swamp. Damn. There's some pretty fucked stuff in this thread.
Big yikes...
Big yikes...
VTshredder69
Active member
14463871:theabortionator said:
Just as funny reading the press secretaries tweets about the 2016 election "Being stolen" but when asked about the 2020 election "there is no way it was stolen"
Both sides are fucking morons.
VTshredder69
Active member
14463876:skierman said:
Lol 50 basement dwellers being let into the capitol isn't an attempt to "overthrow the election" You sound so fucking stupid constantly repeating that.
But yea, the press secretary calling the election stolen in 2016 is pretty fucking hilarious. Because it's ok when democrats do it but not when repubs do it.
Only what fits your agenda.
skierman
Active member
14463881:VTshredder69 said:
You know you've lost when you're trying to equate posts on social media to a riot of the president's supporters attacking police, invading the Capitol with the intention of holding elected officials hostage, hanging the VP and stopping the certification of the presidential election.
But please, do go on explaining away the illegal electors scam coordinated by Trump's team and Trump's multiple phone calls threatening elected officials. I'll wait.
14463859:Monsieur_Patate said:
It's usually just based on titles. As we went over in previous threads it's not uncommon when you go into read the linked articles showing the "truth" they actually disagree with the claim being made. Most aren't reading past the title.
Good example seemed to be the Switzerland heating prison. Article title was something along the lines of "Swiss government says prison time for people who heat their homes!"
When you actually read the article it's a small proposal for a worst case scenario that is 20 steps removed from ever becoming reality. That doesn't stop all "the world is ending" posts though.
My other favorite is the flip flopping on what is a reputable source.
CDC says something that disagrees with me? Deep state cabal.
CDC says something that agrees with me? See I told you so!!!
VTshredder69
Active member
14463887:skierman said:
This coming from the dude that's never cited a single source. LOL.
Your party is in office and yet he's all you can talk about. It's fucking hilarious.
You're secretly in love with trump you psycho.
I guess whatever you can do to try and hide from the trainwreck that is your party in the whitehouse LMFAO.
Lets not look at record high inflation, a president who can't speak or negative GDP for multiple quarters in a row.
Lets focus on the big bad man that lost the election 2 fucking years ago
BAHAHAHA
Keep working in that bike shop you pathetic selfhating white kid.
**This post was edited on Sep 22nd 2022 at 1:10:31pm
ASSholebomber22
Active member
14463891:Jems said:
If you're cool with pedos grooming children just say that
VTshredder69
Active member
14463892:Lonely said:
No one believes in the CDC after the SCAMdemic.
VTshredder69
Active member
14463904:skierman said:
Sorry, eyes got caught in that 12 head
8% IS JUST AN INCH. AND ITS STILL TRUE bahaha
THE INFLATION REDUCTION ACT IS WORKING WONDERFULLY
**This post was edited on Sep 22nd 2022 at 1:55:21pm
TOAST.
Active member
14463848:Craw_Daddy said:
What is so bad about homosexuals being treated as normal people?
If homosexuals weren't treated so shitty by our society it probably wouldn't even be brought up at all in our schools. If a kid is being made fun of because he has two dads or two moms the topic is going to come up and who cares if Paul loves Pete and they provide a caring home for their child.
14463859:Monsieur_Patate said:
Yeah, and homeland security i just tracking down the terrorists.. FBI can equate threats of violence to parents in a hell of a lot of different ways. Dont forget what the FBI has been implicated in in just the past couple of years. Using politifact to prove a point doesnt show me anything. Look who pays for these fact checking websites then you want to act like theres no biases there.
Noone is saying they hate gay people or trans people, just simply that young kids shouldnt be subjected to this stuff in school as young as 5 years fucking old. Are you guys crazy? When I grew up the teacher talked nothing of their private life and when you asked most the time they would tell you that thats their own business. They were there to teach academics, thats why their hired and thats what parents want. Not to have someone deck out their classroom in their political ideology and sexual orientation, and capture the minds of the children. They are not THEIR CHILDREN.
How pissed would you people be if there was a conservative teacher pushing his anti abortion beliefs on your kids. Instead of teaching the subjects he's supposed to, he decked out his classroom in gory pictures of abortions and statistics of babies killed every year, and from 5 years old was teaching these kids that its wrong. There is no room for political ideology in the classroom otherwise it crosses the line into indoctrination and thats what I'm arguing against.
14464003:Lafam said:
Why does it matter what get's taught in the classroom though? It's all just the lies that the global elite want us to believe. I learned way more smoking weed and reading about the truth on info wars in high school.
14464018:Casey said:
Moral panics use "but the children" all the time because it's compelling and drives people to action. The satanic panic, all the things. Even the way abortion was made an issue in the late 70s to go along with the "war on religious freedom" because people eat that shit up. Verse some of the shadier things they were actually worried about like losing their tax exempt status for running racially segregated schools. "Hey we want to be ravist" didn't ring as well even then as " but the children" and "They're coming after my religious freedomsss!!!!!!!
A lot of the narrative is driven the same way. Even the non religious conservatives.
Granby_killdozer
Active member
14464048:theabortionator said:
This is such a dumb comparison. Ron Desantis is not trying to make homosexuality a crime or outlaw gay marriage or take away your rights. All he did was make it illegal to teach five year olds sex ed.
like I said earlier, people who want to get rid of heteronormativity are delusional and if you honestly believe he hates gay people then you are a perfect example of that delusion.
14464055:Craw_Daddy said:
I was going to get into it at the beginning but didn't expect this thread to be a thing. His issues with gay people are more than just this, and being tight with trump.
Hell after the pulse shooting he had had a speech that failed to mention the lgbt community at all. Said something about "people from Orlando and Florida" kind of shitty regarding the anniversary of 50 people getting shot and killed at a gay club. Kind of tone deaf.
As far as this thread it's been more interesting to see how shitty some people honestly are. Wouldn't have thought weird homophobic views would be getting posted these days. At least not here.
Granby_killdozer
Active member
14464062:theabortionator said:
So your reasoning for why he hates gay people is that he didn’t mention them in a recent speech on the anniversary of something that happened years ago. Yeah you’re definitely delusional man…
14464078:Craw_Daddy said:
This was a speech 1 or 2 years after, about the shooting. If 50 people get killed at a gay club not sure why you wouldn't mention anything about gay people. That's kind of weird. Not sure how that's delusional but okay....
Granby_killdozer
Active member
14464081:theabortionator said:
I looked it up. It was 3 years after and he issued a corrected speech and apologized for not mentioning lgbt people. Yeah… your delusional lol. He doesn’t hate gay people. Do you know what the word hate means?
and just to add even more in previous years he did mention lgbt people in his pulse remembrance day speeches. There’s a whole fuckin day dedicated to it there and you’re mad about a speech from one person… delusional
**This post was edited on Sep 23rd 2022 at 7:47:18am
VTshredder69
Active member
Guys, the government has our best intentions in mind. Just listen to them!
- Libs, Dems and morons
- Libs, Dems and morons
Monsieur_Patate
Active member
14464003:Lafam said:
And do you know who's funding the 'newspaper' you posted? I doubt it, or even you would see the irony in calling Politifact biased in comparison to the 'Washington Times'... But you don't care anyway, because their 'articles' fit your narrative, so you don't stop to question them. You're holding sources to different standards depending on whether or not you like what they say, that's not thinking critically, that's irrational faith.
Politifact is very transparent about their funding and donors, your site is not, by the way. But frankly it doesn't matter, because Politifact links their sources at the bottom of each of their article (unlike your source), so if you don't trust their analysis, you're free to skip the article altogether and go straight to their sources to get the actual facts. That's the beauty of proper journalism, it can be easily verified because it's properly sourced.
But it doesn't matter to you what sources they have, you'll take a non-sourced article from a religious cult (in this case the Unification Church) over official statements and documents from the office in question. (again, not talking about Politifact here but the actual sources they linked)
You 'thinking critically' boils down to one simple question: "Do I like what they say?", if yes, then you believe it, if not: "oh they're just corrupt liars, no matter how well sourced and backed up their take is, I'll completely disregard it". You lack intellectual honestly, we could go in circles all day with that 'logic' (or lack thereof).
But please, let's move on to your next claim, please show me your source that CPS is taking children away from families that disagreed with their school board, I'm sure it's from a very reliable, unbiased, and properly sourced publication.
skierman
Active member
14464109:VTshredder69 said:
Guys, the career politicians who pretend to not be politicians who use fear and fake patriotism to increase fundraising while doing nothing to fix the issues affecting the public because they're too busy running podcasts have our best intentions in mind. Just listen to them!
- Dumb fucks like VTshredder
VTshredder69
Active member
14464141:skierman said:
struck a nerve there eh?
XD
Your president is in office and nothing is better in your life. Politics really doing you well.
14464109:VTshredder69 said:
Imo always d level trolling. Always surprised anyone responds to you. I guess you're getting some people to argue. Good luck with that.
VTshredder69
Active member
14464145:theabortionator said:
telling it as it is brother. Sorry you don't get it.
ASSholebomber22
Active member
Lol. Lmao, even.
Ask yourself not why children need exposure to trans people, ask why trans people feel the need to expose themselves to children.
ASSholebomber22
Active member
14464168:skierman said:
((((
GrandThings
Active member
14464161:Biffbarf said:
OF COURSE its not ok for ANY adult to expose themselves to children like this.
I know you hate me, think I'm a kook, libtard, fa&got, etc. but please believe me when I say the VAST VAST majority of trans people are not like this and are just as appalled at this type of behavior as you are. Same with shit like Caitlin Jenner - trans people (at least the ones I know) HATE her because she is a terrible representative of the trans community, yet because of her fame, people assume every trans person loves and agrees with her which is absolutely not the case.
I have two trans friends. One male, one female. The male is the most down to earth bro I've ever met. He skates, smokes weed plays video games, and literally just doesn't want to be bothered in life. My female friend is admittedly more quirky but she's extremely conscious of not "stepping out" in any in-polite or excessive manner because she knows how legitimately dangerous that can be for her physical safety and that people like you are always looking to nitpick anything wrong with the way they present themselves to society.
Being open minded does not mean you have to be ok with the type of stuff you posted. Trans people are not monsters and painting these broad strokes equating all of their actions together is super dangerous.
ASSholebomber22
Active member
14464178:GrandThings said:
I don't hate you. I also don't hate people who want to be left alone and be themselves. I do have a problem with people expecting society to cater to their every whim. People who expect to be addressed as something they clearly aren't, XY's competing in XX sports like there's no difference in anatomy because they feel some sort of way, and adults putting pressure on children to affirm a gender identity one way or the other which could involve irreversible life changing surgery or hormone therapy.
If there are people in the trans community advocating against the things I listed above, I commend them. I'm sure many are fine people.
VTshredder69
Active member
HELP ME RHONDA HELP HELP ME RHONDA
Filthylucre
Member
U ppl r sick in the fucking head. THESE PPL R HUMAN BEING FOR CHRIST SAKE!!!!! YALLL PPL INVOLVED IN THIS SHOULD BE KILLED FOr TREATING OTHER LIKE THIS!!! Go volunteer for a year and live in a mud hit then come talk to me. Y’all so out of touch. The usa is big enough to welcome millions of immigrants whether they arrive legally or not. Y’all a bunch of racist motherfuckers that don’t know a thing out history. Go read a book or get pegged by MTG
**This post was edited on Sep 23rd 2022 at 1:44:17pm
**This post was edited on Sep 23rd 2022 at 1:45:19pm
**This post was edited on Sep 23rd 2022 at 1:44:17pm
**This post was edited on Sep 23rd 2022 at 1:45:19pm
HiHowAreYou
Member
GrandThings
Active member
14464185:Biffbarf said:
I think we've talked about this in a different thread, but when you say "People who expect to be address as something they aren't" you're still using your own personal definitions of what they are or aren't. I don't consider myself to be male because I have a penis, I consider myself to be a male because thats just how I genuinely feel. My friend has a vagina but has thought of himself as a male with every fiber of his being since being born. I'm pretty damn sure we're never going to agree on this, but I don't consider this "catering to society's every whim" but rather just trying to be respectful of others. (I have also misgendered people before. It happens, I've said sorry and they typically respond with "no big deal, I appreciate you trying to use my correct gender/pronoun/name/etc".)
In regards to children and hormones - its not like these are casual conversations or decisions that are made lightly. You seem to be under the impression that as soon as a boy starts playing with barbies they're put on T blockers or given binders in school if they're a girl playing football. Doctors aren't pushing for more trans people, they're simply trying to help people live their own lives in the way they want and yes - kids can know at that young of an age how they identify. (Additionally I think many folks in the trans community are more gender fluid and will spend time on-and-off hormones for their entire life.)
It just sucks how you play this fake open-mindedness once you get called out. If you're "sure many are fine people" then why do you use such large-scale, harmful generalizations? I don't understand people who are into guns, but I don't think you're all school shooters.