cj, to me that attitude is, well, fucked up. elite pros in the
snowboard world get plenty of handrail shots on a consistent year in,
year out basis and generally push the handrail scene as opposed to ams,
regardless of whether it's a mack dawg or technine film.
it's sadly true though, what you say about skiing. pro
skiers today seem to use jibbing as a means to ultimately shred powder
with 16mm cameras focused in on their 180's and 360s into tit deep pow, assuming they had
the ability to hit handrails at all in the first place. to be blunt,
the ultimate for the pro skier in today's shredscape is to end up
skiing powder and hitting jumps for msp; that means you're having fun
while truly getting paid.
yet, all i know is that setting up a
handrail downtown and making a session happen is a very fun thing to
do. moving to whistler and skiing powder for a year is also loads and
loads of fun. both involve learning important skills, almost necessary
prerequisites if you will, to becoming an all around shredder in this
day and age. don't get me wrong, i'm down for specialization, so if a
certain skier, or even a certain brand chooses to focus on powder
moreso than handrails it is well within their rights to do so and i
will not be one to judge in the slightest. but overall there has to be
at least some crossover, and i feel like skiing as a whole is slowly
forgetting about its urban roots that have been established over the
past half decade. it is very much a powder and aerials spectacle now at
the highest levels.
what about skiing in the city? it's fun! it's
edgy! there is still aaample room for progression! kids eat it up when
its popular! and tanner, pep et al, back when they used to hit handrails, really were onto something! so where have all the pros gone, and who is responsible
for the de-urbanization of skiing? i blame matchstick.
ps, corey vanular and frank raymond give urban skiing hope at the top end pro side of things.