14547176:combatgoon17 said:i challenge you to not go on reddit the next 90 days
14547176:combatgoon17 said:i challenge you to not go on reddit the next 90 days
14547154:K-Dot. said:Redditors aren’t soyboys, they’re bacon boys. Calling someone a soyboy while being in unhealthy shape from consuming excessive amounts of carcinogenic animal products and sugar is incredibly reddit behavior though.
One of the most striking things about r/skiing is how ahistorical it is. Other subreddits have some notion of lore and legend while that sub often treats freeskiing like it was invented in 2017 by andri ragetli. It’s honestly puzzling how incurious the sub seems about the vast history of skiing. Is there an actual good skiing sub somewhere on Reddit? And while on the topic, are there any good skiing tiktok pages? Not looking to watch Hackel repost realski clips set to viral tiktok dance songs
14547194:BradFiAusNzCoCa said:I once got into an argument on r/skiing about Attack toe height and monitoring it for movement. They told me I was wrong and said they were ski patrol at Loveland. I then explained in detail why they were wrong and that I, also, ski Loveland and that I can remember no patrollers with 1st gen attacks.
They admitted they were weekend volunteer patrol and didn’t know that much about ski gear. That, to me, is r/skiing in a nutshell.
14547208:TOAST. said:you know every patrollers bindings? That's weird man.
14547209:BradFiAusNzCoCa said:I didn’t say I know every patrollers bindings but I do check out a lot of setups just out of interest. I pretty much look at every pair of skis around me. I don’t think I’m unusual for that on this website.
14547255:b0ss said:Yall are hilarious, im watching the toxicity levels raising by the hour. Everyone is calling each other fat pieces of shit and recommending on3ps.
14547261:Jems said:where is this happening i am not seeing this
14547265:b0ss said:/r/skiing
14547311:Jems said:went to r/skiing to talk some shit and ended up getting in an argument with a TGR forum elitist about how jeffrey 102s aren’t a floppy noodle that can’t handle any advanced skiing
14547318:b0ss said:You got in an argument with me you idiot!
14547324:Jems said:no way that’s you considering that person is on r/skiing literally all day everyday
14547154:K-Dot. said:carcinogenic animal products
14547510:SendyMcSendyface said:I'm too old to argue with people on reddit anymore, tryna make my life more peaceful, not less
14547534:K-Dot. said:https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/cancer-carcinogenicity-of-the-consumption-of-red-meat-and-processed-meat
https://www.fredhutch.org/en/news/spotlight/2022/08/ccg-zheng-jnutr.html
14547534:K-Dot. said:https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/cancer-carcinogenicity-of-the-consumption-of-red-meat-and-processed-meat
https://www.fredhutch.org/en/news/spotlight/2022/08/ccg-zheng-jnutr.html
14547579:SteezyYeeter said:would the trolling be more chaotic if we knew who eachother was or not? ?
also please give good examples of trolling i feel like you have to be much more careful there than here please and thank you
**This post was edited on Aug 17th 2023 at 7:50:05pm
14547594:MichiganCatFart said:Your Reddit name is literally the same as your Newschoolers one
14547644:SteezyYeeter said:let's go ?![]()
14547534:K-Dot. said:https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/cancer-carcinogenicity-of-the-consumption-of-red-meat-and-processed-meat
https://www.fredhutch.org/en/news/spotlight/2022/08/ccg-zheng-jnutr.html
14547701:TWoods said:“
In the case of red meat, the classification is based on limited evidence from epidemiological studies showing positive associations between eating red meat and developing colorectal cancer as well as strong mechanistic evidence.
Limited evidence means that a positive association has been observed between exposure to the agent and cancer but that other explanations for the observations (technically termed chance, bias, or confounding) could not be ruled out.”
lolllllll
“WHO”
LOLLLLLLLL
14547701:TWoods said:“
In the case of red meat, the classification is based on limited evidence from epidemiological studies showing positive associations between eating red meat and developing colorectal cancer as well as strong mechanistic evidence.
Limited evidence means that a positive association has been observed between exposure to the agent and cancer but that other explanations for the observations (technically termed chance, bias, or confounding) could not be ruled out.”
lolllllll
“WHO”
LOLLLLLLLL
14547725:BIIIGZ said:homie really just googled “red meat causes cancer” and copy pasted the first two links that came up
14547738:TWoods said:The WHO “study” (results of a focus group looking at a bunch of papers together) is the scientific equivalent of “source: trust me bro”


14547730:b0ss said:The same people who think we need to eat insects!?
14547753:Pablo_Sanchez said:I’m more scared of getting a prion disease from venison than cancer from red meats
**This post was edited on Aug 19th 2023 at 1:52:10am
14547534:K-Dot. said:https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/cancer-carcinogenicity-of-the-consumption-of-red-meat-and-processed-meat
https://www.fredhutch.org/en/news/spotlight/2022/08/ccg-zheng-jnutr.html
14547760:hi_vis360 said:You already have one it just won’t kick in for 20 years