Recommend me a Telephoto lens

[J_Gasper]

[J_Gasper]

Active member
Hey guys,

Lately, I have found the need for a telephoto. I have a few I need to decide from. First, the canon 70-200 f4 L. Next, the sigma 70-200 f/2.8 II. Also, the Nikon Nikkor Vintage 80-200 f4 push pull. I wouldn't be using this TO much, but defiantly dont want to cheap out. The reason for wanting the canon is because I have heard great things about it, durable, weather proof, and decent AF. For the sigma, I like how I get an extra few stops of aperture for around the same price, but have heard about some durability/quality control issues. Lastly, really the main reason I am looking into the Nikkor is because it is a cheap alternative. I have not seen much test footy of it, just hear some good things off of NS bout it. Will I have quality issues with shooting through so much glass?

I wouldn't be using these as an every day lens, but need something for shooting landscape, nature, and skiing.

Lastly, does everyone just use generic tripod collars? Or is that something I shouldn't cheap out on?

+K for help!
 
If you get the older nikon push pull, get the 2.8. its a very nice lens, same glass as the modern version, just different build.
 
I can't comment specifically on the Nikkor, but push/pull zooms in general are notorious for being dust pumps and loosing up as they get older.

I've got the canon 70-200 f4L, and it has never failed to perform. Simply an amazing lens for the price. Great contrast, good sharpness at f/4 and good IQ, the epitome of an L series lens. The only way I'd even consider getting rid of mine is to replace is with a f/2.8 IS II. You won't be disappointed with it.

And as for the tripod ring, I've got a cheapo ebay ring, and it caused some rubbing where it mounts, taking off some of the paint. Not a huge deal, because my lens already has a good amount of wear and tear, but it's something to consider if you want to resell eventually. Is the ring a necessity? No. Is it nice to have? Yes. Is it worth spending the 140ish dollars for the Canon ring? Not really.

 
70-200 f/4 IS or f/2.8. From what I know they are much sharper than the f/4. Someone should verify this for me.

I also like my 85mm f/1.8 if thats a good enough focal length for you
 
I was considering the 85mm. The only reason I am drawn away from it is that I think a telephoto prime would kinda be pointless in my situation. When Im shooting a jump from a distance, I want the lens to work more around me, not having to move if I like the spot. The situations I would be using a telephoto would require variable focal lengths, so thats my problem.

Also, can someone verify that the f4 IS and/or 2.8 are sharper then the f4?
 
sharper yes, but not by a huge amount. if you are shooting pictures, you can deff just sharpen in post
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top