Reckoner KF or 110

L

LouiseLover

New member
Trying to pick between these 2 for a new soft snow ski out west. Home mountain Lake Louise, but ski all over BC, Wyoming and Utah. Narrowed it down to these 2 as I feel K2 is all around killing it as far as making skis that combine surfy symmetrical shapes, soft forgiving flex that can still go fast, and a weight that's heavy enough to still be damp enough, but not heavy.

Current pow ski is an old Rossi Super 7 that I got for like $100. Has worked fine for the 5ish days a year it actually gets pulled out. Daily drive QST 98's +2.5 from rec. 110 seems like the more practical choice for me and will probably be more conducive to the wide open skiing we have up here, and be better for drops etc.

Worried I'll be wishing for the extra width and looser feel of the KF any time there's over 6 inches of fresh. Anyone been on it much? Can it still be pushed as much as the 110?
 
no experience with the ski personally but from seeing reviews and talking with some boys at evo who dailyed it last season, the KF is the way to go
 
during testing last season the KF is a much stiffer ski then the 110, if your looking for more playful and jibby then I'd pick the 110 but for a charger in pow and something to still pull out on those sleeper 10cm lake days where the fence lines are holding 20-30cm on the back side I'd pick the KF.
 
If you already have a mid width daily, don't be afraid to go wider on your pow skis. 110 is still considered daily range and honestly 114 is too, just get the KF's.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top