Puffy pants or links

rrjames

rrjames

Member
im looking to buy a new pair of ski pants and i cant decide on the puffys or links from oakley which would be warmer

High North Session 1&2

Gropen Frau Lmao!

I ate a lava lamp it wasn't lava
 
puffys=warmer but probably not as waterproof/unwet

"He can pull mistys, switch backs, various 360's, 540's and 720's and is currently working on Lincoln Loops."

-Bthere TV on Tanner Hall
 
warmer? puffys I suppose. But you get what you pay for. and if they are some of the cheapest pants in Oakley's line, they are made cheaply. Check out Burton pants, for the same price you can get 20,000 mm sick pants

I dream of winter.
 
The puffy pants have 4,000 waterproofing, that's not terrible. Siver had that last year, and I've never heard anyone talk bad about them.
 
i got the black link pant in xl and it seems to be pretty warm. its not as thin as you would expect it to be.
 
my oakley lab2.0 pants are 4000 or 5000 i think and they are both warm as hell and waterproof...i never got wet in them.
 
Freezed and AnotherPE are right. If it is a sunny, dry day, 4 or 5K won't be that bad. But, if you ski a longer day where snow is constantly touching your pants (powder much?) you need 10K or better
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top