progressive scan/interlaced question

stephen_beast

stephen_beast

Active member
hey, i was wondering how bad you could notice the interlacing on video if i had the shutter speed up around 1/250 or so? if you can, would a higher shutter speed help? what type of ccd (progressive or interlaced) would be better for shooting skiing (seems sort of stupid, but i am just trying to understand the differences between these)? also how would either of these affect slow motion? thanks

THE OFFICIAL FIRST EVER LISTENER TO NS RADIO
 
you probably dont want to do interlaced on slow mo

'Reality is a crutch for people who can't cope with drugs.'

-Lily Tomlin

Camp of Champions, Session B
 
I don't know a whole lot about this topic. But with interlaced, which I have, when you put into slow mo when you are panning it gets really choppy, and even if you are having the camera not move, the skier will get choppy pretty much if you go below 70%.

|D|U|N|C|A|N|

Junction 133 Productions
 
yea, that is where my question lies, right now you are shooting with a trv 11 right? i am not sure but i think it has a non adjustable shutter speed of 1/60. with progressive scan would there be any need for adjustable shutter speed, because there is no interlacing in the images? on interlaced video with a higher shutter speed would you be able to compensate for the interlacing? also are there any effective deinterlacing video filters? in normal speed would the interlacing be obvious for shooting skiing, and with a hihger shutter speed would you be able to see interlacing in slow motion?

THE OFFICIAL FIRST EVER LISTENER TO NS RADIO
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top